{"title":"两种风险模型在预测冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后造影剂诱发肾病方面的比较","authors":"Valentin Trevizani Neto, Layla Lott, Davi Rios, Priscila Lima, Mário Bazzarella, Izabela Muniz, Sabrina Pereira, Vitor Rolim, Renato Serpa, O. Calil, Luiz Barbosa, Roberto Babosa","doi":"10.31160/jotci202331a20230011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the main causes of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. The Mehran risk score and the contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio could help identifying patients at higher risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy. This study aimed to compare these two scores. Methods A retrospective, single-center observational study including hospitalized patients with baseline creatinine >1.3mg/dL, under observation for at least 48 hours after coronary computed tomography angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Mehran risk score and contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio were calculated for all patients, and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was analyzed according to different cutoff points of both scores. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were plotted to determine the accuracy of the methods in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy. The effectiveness of both methods was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test. Results We included 102 patients and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was 27.4%. The outcome occurred in 24.7% of patients when Mehran risk score ≥6, in 32.7% when Mehran risk score ≥10, and in 57.8% when Mehran risk score ≥15, in 28.7% of patients with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥2, 29.8% with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥3, and 34.3% with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥5. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves demonstrated area under the curve with moderate predictive capacity for Mehran risk score (0.7), and reduced/borderline for contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio (0.6). The correlation between the two scores was moderate. Conclusion Mehran risk score demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy when compared to contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio, however both presented similar values. The cutoff points with the closest incidence between the two scores were ≥10 for Mehran risk score (32.7%) and ≥5 for volume used/creatinine clearance ratio (34.3%).","PeriodicalId":152272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two risk models in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary computed tomography angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Trevizani Neto, Layla Lott, Davi Rios, Priscila Lima, Mário Bazzarella, Izabela Muniz, Sabrina Pereira, Vitor Rolim, Renato Serpa, O. Calil, Luiz Barbosa, Roberto Babosa\",\"doi\":\"10.31160/jotci202331a20230011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the main causes of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. The Mehran risk score and the contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio could help identifying patients at higher risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy. This study aimed to compare these two scores. Methods A retrospective, single-center observational study including hospitalized patients with baseline creatinine >1.3mg/dL, under observation for at least 48 hours after coronary computed tomography angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Mehran risk score and contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio were calculated for all patients, and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was analyzed according to different cutoff points of both scores. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were plotted to determine the accuracy of the methods in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy. The effectiveness of both methods was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test. Results We included 102 patients and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was 27.4%. The outcome occurred in 24.7% of patients when Mehran risk score ≥6, in 32.7% when Mehran risk score ≥10, and in 57.8% when Mehran risk score ≥15, in 28.7% of patients with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥2, 29.8% with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥3, and 34.3% with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥5. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves demonstrated area under the curve with moderate predictive capacity for Mehran risk score (0.7), and reduced/borderline for contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio (0.6). The correlation between the two scores was moderate. Conclusion Mehran risk score demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy when compared to contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio, however both presented similar values. The cutoff points with the closest incidence between the two scores were ≥10 for Mehran risk score (32.7%) and ≥5 for volume used/creatinine clearance ratio (34.3%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":152272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31160/jotci202331a20230011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31160/jotci202331a20230011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of two risk models in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary computed tomography angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
Background Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the main causes of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. The Mehran risk score and the contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio could help identifying patients at higher risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy. This study aimed to compare these two scores. Methods A retrospective, single-center observational study including hospitalized patients with baseline creatinine >1.3mg/dL, under observation for at least 48 hours after coronary computed tomography angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Mehran risk score and contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio were calculated for all patients, and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was analyzed according to different cutoff points of both scores. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were plotted to determine the accuracy of the methods in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy. The effectiveness of both methods was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test. Results We included 102 patients and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was 27.4%. The outcome occurred in 24.7% of patients when Mehran risk score ≥6, in 32.7% when Mehran risk score ≥10, and in 57.8% when Mehran risk score ≥15, in 28.7% of patients with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥2, 29.8% with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥3, and 34.3% with contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio ≥5. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves demonstrated area under the curve with moderate predictive capacity for Mehran risk score (0.7), and reduced/borderline for contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio (0.6). The correlation between the two scores was moderate. Conclusion Mehran risk score demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy when compared to contrast medium volume used/creatinine clearance ratio, however both presented similar values. The cutoff points with the closest incidence between the two scores were ≥10 for Mehran risk score (32.7%) and ≥5 for volume used/creatinine clearance ratio (34.3%).