我今天觉得自己很聪明关于自恋和自我评估智力的每日日记研究

R. Rogoza, M. Zajenkowski, Marco Di Sarno, Maria Flakus, Lidia Baran, Rossella Di Pierro, G. Krammer, E. Jauk, R. Fatfouta
{"title":"我今天觉得自己很聪明关于自恋和自我评估智力的每日日记研究","authors":"R. Rogoza, M. Zajenkowski, Marco Di Sarno, Maria Flakus, Lidia Baran, Rossella Di Pierro, G. Krammer, E. Jauk, R. Fatfouta","doi":"10.1177/08902070231212313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the objective level of intelligence is not associated with narcissism, relations to self-assessed intelligence (SAI) have been repeatedly reported. Existing research suggests that different facets of narcissism may have different associations with SAI. In the current daily diary study ( N = 176; N = 3975 total observations), we employed dynamic structural equation modeling to examine the relationships between facets of trait and state narcissism (i.e., agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic) and the level, variability, and instability of SAI assessed over 28 consecutive days. Both trait and state narcissism were consistently related to SAI: agentic narcissism showed a positive relationship, whereas antagonistic and neurotic narcissism showed negative relationships with SAI. Trait agentic and state antagonistic narcissism predicted greater variability of SAI scores throughout the study, while neither trait nor state narcissism predicted the instability of SAI. Finally, we found that experiencing increased agentic narcissism on one day, predicted perceiving oneself as more intelligent on the next day, but feeling smarter did not predict feeling narcissistic over time. Moreover, we demonstrated that differentiating between narcissism facets yielded more theoretically accurate results compared to distinguishing between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism.","PeriodicalId":502295,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I feel smart today! A daily diary study on narcissism and self-assessed intelligence\",\"authors\":\"R. Rogoza, M. Zajenkowski, Marco Di Sarno, Maria Flakus, Lidia Baran, Rossella Di Pierro, G. Krammer, E. Jauk, R. Fatfouta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08902070231212313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the objective level of intelligence is not associated with narcissism, relations to self-assessed intelligence (SAI) have been repeatedly reported. Existing research suggests that different facets of narcissism may have different associations with SAI. In the current daily diary study ( N = 176; N = 3975 total observations), we employed dynamic structural equation modeling to examine the relationships between facets of trait and state narcissism (i.e., agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic) and the level, variability, and instability of SAI assessed over 28 consecutive days. Both trait and state narcissism were consistently related to SAI: agentic narcissism showed a positive relationship, whereas antagonistic and neurotic narcissism showed negative relationships with SAI. Trait agentic and state antagonistic narcissism predicted greater variability of SAI scores throughout the study, while neither trait nor state narcissism predicted the instability of SAI. Finally, we found that experiencing increased agentic narcissism on one day, predicted perceiving oneself as more intelligent on the next day, but feeling smarter did not predict feeling narcissistic over time. Moreover, we demonstrated that differentiating between narcissism facets yielded more theoretically accurate results compared to distinguishing between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231212313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231212313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然客观智力水平与自恋无关,但自恋与自我评估智力(SAI)的关系却屡有报道。现有研究表明,自恋的不同方面可能与自评智力有不同的关联。在目前的每日日记研究中(N = 176;N = 3975 个观察结果),我们采用动态结构方程模型来研究特质自恋和状态自恋(即代理型、对抗型和神经质型)的不同侧面与连续 28 天评估的自评智力(SAI)的水平、可变性和不稳定性之间的关系。特质自恋和状态自恋都与自恋指数有一致的关系:代理型自恋与自恋指数呈正相关,而对抗型自恋和神经质自恋与自恋指数呈负相关。在整个研究过程中,特质代理型自恋和状态对抗型自恋预示着 SAI 分数的更大变异性,而特质自恋和状态自恋都不能预示 SAI 的不稳定性。最后,我们发现,如果某天代理型自恋增加,第二天就会认为自己更聪明,但感觉自己更聪明并不能预测自恋程度的变化。此外,我们还证明,与区分自大自恋和脆弱自恋相比,区分自恋的不同方面会产生更准确的理论结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
I feel smart today! A daily diary study on narcissism and self-assessed intelligence
While the objective level of intelligence is not associated with narcissism, relations to self-assessed intelligence (SAI) have been repeatedly reported. Existing research suggests that different facets of narcissism may have different associations with SAI. In the current daily diary study ( N = 176; N = 3975 total observations), we employed dynamic structural equation modeling to examine the relationships between facets of trait and state narcissism (i.e., agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic) and the level, variability, and instability of SAI assessed over 28 consecutive days. Both trait and state narcissism were consistently related to SAI: agentic narcissism showed a positive relationship, whereas antagonistic and neurotic narcissism showed negative relationships with SAI. Trait agentic and state antagonistic narcissism predicted greater variability of SAI scores throughout the study, while neither trait nor state narcissism predicted the instability of SAI. Finally, we found that experiencing increased agentic narcissism on one day, predicted perceiving oneself as more intelligent on the next day, but feeling smarter did not predict feeling narcissistic over time. Moreover, we demonstrated that differentiating between narcissism facets yielded more theoretically accurate results compared to distinguishing between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信