基于 Ising-like 模型的蒙特卡罗熵采样法与自旋交叉纳米粒子热特性的局部均值场研究对比研究

J. Linares, C. Cazelles, Pierre Richard Dahoo, N. Belmouri, K. Boukheddaden
{"title":"基于 Ising-like 模型的蒙特卡罗熵采样法与自旋交叉纳米粒子热特性的局部均值场研究对比研究","authors":"J. Linares, C. Cazelles, Pierre Richard Dahoo, N. Belmouri, K. Boukheddaden","doi":"10.20517/cs.2023.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thermally induced transitions between low-spin (LS) and high-spin (HS) configurations of spin-crossover (SCO) nanoparticles are simulated, focusing on the effects of localized surface and bulk interactions on the average magnetization of 2D square lattices. The thermal behaviors and hysteresis cycles are investigated within the framework of the Ising model Hamiltonian and are conducted following two approaches: local mean field approximation (LMFA) and Monte Carlo entropic sampling (MCES) techniques. The results obtained by these two methods are compared for the two square lattice sizes, 6 $$ \\times $$ 6 and 7 $$ \\times $$ 7. Thus, when the bulk-surface interaction term is set to zero, the two approaches lead to identical values of the surface and bulk transition temperatures separated by a long intermediate plateau in both cases. Although hysteresis curves exhibit a similar shape, LMFA shows slightly larger widths $$ \\Delta T $$ than MCES. On increasing bulk-surface interaction term, the two methods lead to different shifts in equilibrium temperature values for both bulk and surface components, respectively, to lower and higher values by MCES. In general, it is found that LMFA shifts surface equilibrium temperature differently to lower values and enhances the hysteresis effect, particularly for surface molecules. On the other hand, for the 7 $$ \\times $$ 7 square lattice, the equilibrium temperatures are slightly higher by 1.5% and 3.2% for bulk and surface molecules, respectively, with a narrower hysteresis width in the surface. Moreover, with the MCES method, an abrupt transition instead of a hysteresis transition is calculated for surface molecules ($$ \\Delta T_{surf}^{MCES}=0 $$ K).","PeriodicalId":381136,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Synthesis","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study between Monte Carlo entropic sampling method and local mean field investigations of thermal properties of spin-crossover nanoparticles based on Ising-like model\",\"authors\":\"J. Linares, C. Cazelles, Pierre Richard Dahoo, N. Belmouri, K. Boukheddaden\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/cs.2023.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The thermally induced transitions between low-spin (LS) and high-spin (HS) configurations of spin-crossover (SCO) nanoparticles are simulated, focusing on the effects of localized surface and bulk interactions on the average magnetization of 2D square lattices. The thermal behaviors and hysteresis cycles are investigated within the framework of the Ising model Hamiltonian and are conducted following two approaches: local mean field approximation (LMFA) and Monte Carlo entropic sampling (MCES) techniques. The results obtained by these two methods are compared for the two square lattice sizes, 6 $$ \\\\times $$ 6 and 7 $$ \\\\times $$ 7. Thus, when the bulk-surface interaction term is set to zero, the two approaches lead to identical values of the surface and bulk transition temperatures separated by a long intermediate plateau in both cases. Although hysteresis curves exhibit a similar shape, LMFA shows slightly larger widths $$ \\\\Delta T $$ than MCES. On increasing bulk-surface interaction term, the two methods lead to different shifts in equilibrium temperature values for both bulk and surface components, respectively, to lower and higher values by MCES. In general, it is found that LMFA shifts surface equilibrium temperature differently to lower values and enhances the hysteresis effect, particularly for surface molecules. On the other hand, for the 7 $$ \\\\times $$ 7 square lattice, the equilibrium temperatures are slightly higher by 1.5% and 3.2% for bulk and surface molecules, respectively, with a narrower hysteresis width in the surface. Moreover, with the MCES method, an abrupt transition instead of a hysteresis transition is calculated for surface molecules ($$ \\\\Delta T_{surf}^{MCES}=0 $$ K).\",\"PeriodicalId\":381136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Synthesis\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/cs.2023.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/cs.2023.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模拟了自旋交叉(SCO)纳米粒子的低自旋(LS)和高自旋(HS)构型之间的热诱导转变,重点研究了局部表面和块体相互作用对二维方晶格平均磁化的影响。在伊辛模型哈密顿框架内研究了热行为和滞后循环,并采用了两种方法:局部平均场近似(LMFA)和蒙特卡罗熵采样(MCES)技术。因此,当体表相互作用项设为零时,这两种方法得出的体表转变温度和体表转变温度的值完全相同,在这两种情况下,体表转变温度和体表转变温度之间都有一个较长的中间高原。虽然滞后曲线的形状相似,但 LMFA 的宽度 $$ \Delta T $$ 略大于 MCES。随着块体-表面相互作用项的增加,两种方法分别导致块体和表面成分的平衡温度值发生不同的移动,MCES 的移动值更低,MCES 的移动值更高。总的来说,LMFA 会使表面平衡温度向较低值移动,并增强滞后效应,尤其是对表面分子而言。另一方面,对于 7 $$ \times $$ 7 方晶格,体分子和表面分子的平衡温度分别略高 1.5% 和 3.2%,表面的滞后宽度更窄。此外,采用 MCES 方法计算出的表面分子的过渡是突然的,而不是滞后过渡($$ \Delta T_{surf}^{MCES}=0 $$ K)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study between Monte Carlo entropic sampling method and local mean field investigations of thermal properties of spin-crossover nanoparticles based on Ising-like model
The thermally induced transitions between low-spin (LS) and high-spin (HS) configurations of spin-crossover (SCO) nanoparticles are simulated, focusing on the effects of localized surface and bulk interactions on the average magnetization of 2D square lattices. The thermal behaviors and hysteresis cycles are investigated within the framework of the Ising model Hamiltonian and are conducted following two approaches: local mean field approximation (LMFA) and Monte Carlo entropic sampling (MCES) techniques. The results obtained by these two methods are compared for the two square lattice sizes, 6 $$ \times $$ 6 and 7 $$ \times $$ 7. Thus, when the bulk-surface interaction term is set to zero, the two approaches lead to identical values of the surface and bulk transition temperatures separated by a long intermediate plateau in both cases. Although hysteresis curves exhibit a similar shape, LMFA shows slightly larger widths $$ \Delta T $$ than MCES. On increasing bulk-surface interaction term, the two methods lead to different shifts in equilibrium temperature values for both bulk and surface components, respectively, to lower and higher values by MCES. In general, it is found that LMFA shifts surface equilibrium temperature differently to lower values and enhances the hysteresis effect, particularly for surface molecules. On the other hand, for the 7 $$ \times $$ 7 square lattice, the equilibrium temperatures are slightly higher by 1.5% and 3.2% for bulk and surface molecules, respectively, with a narrower hysteresis width in the surface. Moreover, with the MCES method, an abrupt transition instead of a hysteresis transition is calculated for surface molecules ($$ \Delta T_{surf}^{MCES}=0 $$ K).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信