比较等长后放松与静态拉伸对无症状健康人下肢灵活性的效果的随机对照试验

Abdul Hanan Nadeem, Muddsar Hameed, Hamaida Akbar, Muhammad Adeel Ahmed, Muhammad Ali Hassan, Salaar Ghafoor, Muneeb Hassan Khera, Abdullah Saeed
{"title":"比较等长后放松与静态拉伸对无症状健康人下肢灵活性的效果的随机对照试验","authors":"Abdul Hanan Nadeem, Muddsar Hameed, Hamaida Akbar, Muhammad Adeel Ahmed, Muhammad Ali Hassan, Salaar Ghafoor, Muneeb Hassan Khera, Abdullah Saeed","doi":"10.15379/ijmst.v10i5.3152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The objective of this study was to observe the effectiveness of Post isometric relaxation versus static stretching in lower limbs among asymptomatic healthy individuals. Methods: This randomized controlled trial study was carried out in students of Shifa Tameer e Millat University from December 2021 to July 2022. 49 participants of both genders were included through non probability convenient sampling on the basis of inclusion criteria of both genders with age range of 18-25years. Participants with any history of any trauma, fractures, meniscal injuries, systemic illness and any lower limb musculoskeletal deformities were excluded from the study. A self-structured questionnaire was used to obtain demographics; a standard questionnaire; Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and outcome measures; active knee extension, straight leg raise, standard sit and reach and finger to floor distance tests were used. The participants were divided into two groups, Group A received post isometric relaxation technique and Group B received static Stretching. The data collected was analyzed by using SPSS software version 21. Results: The mean age of participants in Post Isometric Relaxation group was 22.083±1.44 and 21.72±1.62 in Static Stretching group. The with group analysis showed significant results as p value was less than 0.05. Whereas for between group analysis p value was greater than 0.05 so no significant improvement was observed at post level. Conclusion: The current study concluded that no treatment technique was superior than the other as both were equally effective for hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals.","PeriodicalId":301862,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology","volume":"93 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Post Isometric Relaxation versus Static Stretching in Lower Limb Flexibility among Asymptomatic Healthy Individuals\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Hanan Nadeem, Muddsar Hameed, Hamaida Akbar, Muhammad Adeel Ahmed, Muhammad Ali Hassan, Salaar Ghafoor, Muneeb Hassan Khera, Abdullah Saeed\",\"doi\":\"10.15379/ijmst.v10i5.3152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The objective of this study was to observe the effectiveness of Post isometric relaxation versus static stretching in lower limbs among asymptomatic healthy individuals. Methods: This randomized controlled trial study was carried out in students of Shifa Tameer e Millat University from December 2021 to July 2022. 49 participants of both genders were included through non probability convenient sampling on the basis of inclusion criteria of both genders with age range of 18-25years. Participants with any history of any trauma, fractures, meniscal injuries, systemic illness and any lower limb musculoskeletal deformities were excluded from the study. A self-structured questionnaire was used to obtain demographics; a standard questionnaire; Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and outcome measures; active knee extension, straight leg raise, standard sit and reach and finger to floor distance tests were used. The participants were divided into two groups, Group A received post isometric relaxation technique and Group B received static Stretching. The data collected was analyzed by using SPSS software version 21. Results: The mean age of participants in Post Isometric Relaxation group was 22.083±1.44 and 21.72±1.62 in Static Stretching group. The with group analysis showed significant results as p value was less than 0.05. Whereas for between group analysis p value was greater than 0.05 so no significant improvement was observed at post level. Conclusion: The current study concluded that no treatment technique was superior than the other as both were equally effective for hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"93 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i5.3152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i5.3152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在观察无症状健康人下肢等长放松后拉伸与静态拉伸的效果。研究方法这项随机对照试验研究于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 7 月在希法-塔梅尔-米拉特大学的学生中进行。根据男女生年龄在 18-25 岁之间的纳入标准,通过非概率方便抽样法纳入了 49 名男女参与者。有外伤史、骨折史、半月板损伤史、全身性疾病史和下肢肌肉骨骼畸形史的参与者不在研究范围内。研究采用自编问卷调查法了解参与者的人口统计学特征、标准问卷、下肢功能量表(LEFS)和结果测量法,包括主动伸膝、直腿抬高、标准坐姿、伸手和手指到地面距离测试。参与者被分为两组,A 组接受等距后放松技术,B 组接受静态拉伸。收集到的数据使用 SPSS 软件 21 版进行分析。结果等距后放松组参与者的平均年龄为(22.083±1.44)岁,静态拉伸组参与者的平均年龄为(21.72±1.62)岁。组间分析结果显示,P 值小于 0.05,具有显著性。而组间分析的 p 值大于 0.05,因此没有观察到明显的改善。结论本研究得出的结论是,没有哪种治疗方法优于其他方法,因为两种方法对无症状人群的腘绳肌灵活性同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Post Isometric Relaxation versus Static Stretching in Lower Limb Flexibility among Asymptomatic Healthy Individuals
Purpose: The objective of this study was to observe the effectiveness of Post isometric relaxation versus static stretching in lower limbs among asymptomatic healthy individuals. Methods: This randomized controlled trial study was carried out in students of Shifa Tameer e Millat University from December 2021 to July 2022. 49 participants of both genders were included through non probability convenient sampling on the basis of inclusion criteria of both genders with age range of 18-25years. Participants with any history of any trauma, fractures, meniscal injuries, systemic illness and any lower limb musculoskeletal deformities were excluded from the study. A self-structured questionnaire was used to obtain demographics; a standard questionnaire; Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and outcome measures; active knee extension, straight leg raise, standard sit and reach and finger to floor distance tests were used. The participants were divided into two groups, Group A received post isometric relaxation technique and Group B received static Stretching. The data collected was analyzed by using SPSS software version 21. Results: The mean age of participants in Post Isometric Relaxation group was 22.083±1.44 and 21.72±1.62 in Static Stretching group. The with group analysis showed significant results as p value was less than 0.05. Whereas for between group analysis p value was greater than 0.05 so no significant improvement was observed at post level. Conclusion: The current study concluded that no treatment technique was superior than the other as both were equally effective for hamstring flexibility in asymptomatic individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信