重症监护病房 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者使用俯卧位的预测因素:横断面研究

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
S. Vásquez, Olga Lucía Cortés, María del Pilar Paipa-Campos, Carolina Mójica-Diaz, Yudy Andrea Rojas-Castañeda, Sandra Patricia Pulido-Barragán, Martha Cecilia Arias-Portillo, Maribel Esparza-Bohorquez, Natalia Martínez, Indira Alba Arévalo-Sandoval
{"title":"重症监护病房 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者使用俯卧位的预测因素:横断面研究","authors":"S. Vásquez, Olga Lucía Cortés, María del Pilar Paipa-Campos, Carolina Mójica-Diaz, Yudy Andrea Rojas-Castañeda, Sandra Patricia Pulido-Barragán, Martha Cecilia Arias-Portillo, Maribel Esparza-Bohorquez, Natalia Martínez, Indira Alba Arévalo-Sandoval","doi":"10.18502/npt.v10i4.14079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: Clinical recommendations for ventilation management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome suggest the use of prone position as complementary therapy, however, there is wide variability in its use. The purpose of this study is to identify the predictor factors for using the prone position for patients hospitalized in intensive care units with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods & Materials: A Cross-sectional study was carried out, including adult patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome hospitalized in intensive care units of four hospitals in Colombia. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in which the main outcome was the prone position in intensive care, and the independent variables included sociodemographic characteristics, history, health status, progress, and treatment. Results: A total of 473 patients were included in this study; 59.8% (n=283) received prone position therapy within 24-96 hours of hospitalization in intensive care. Out of the total of eligible variables in the logistics-regression model, factors in favor of the prone position were PCR>10mg/L (OR=3.33), private healthcare network (OR=1.99), hypertension (OR=1,76), cough or dyspnea symptoms at intensive care admission (OR=2.69 and OR=1.91), oxygen saturation <90% (OR=1.84). Factors against the prone position were heart disease (OR=0.34), FiO2>50% (OR=0.32), and TP>13 seconds (OR=0.53). Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with a higher probability of prone position in intensive care were those with PCR>10mg/L, cough, dyspnea, and private healthcare network. The predictors identified in this study could help standardize the prone position therapy.","PeriodicalId":36883,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Practice Today","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"S. Vásquez, Olga Lucía Cortés, María del Pilar Paipa-Campos, Carolina Mójica-Diaz, Yudy Andrea Rojas-Castañeda, Sandra Patricia Pulido-Barragán, Martha Cecilia Arias-Portillo, Maribel Esparza-Bohorquez, Natalia Martínez, Indira Alba Arévalo-Sandoval\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/npt.v10i4.14079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Aim: Clinical recommendations for ventilation management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome suggest the use of prone position as complementary therapy, however, there is wide variability in its use. The purpose of this study is to identify the predictor factors for using the prone position for patients hospitalized in intensive care units with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods & Materials: A Cross-sectional study was carried out, including adult patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome hospitalized in intensive care units of four hospitals in Colombia. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in which the main outcome was the prone position in intensive care, and the independent variables included sociodemographic characteristics, history, health status, progress, and treatment. Results: A total of 473 patients were included in this study; 59.8% (n=283) received prone position therapy within 24-96 hours of hospitalization in intensive care. Out of the total of eligible variables in the logistics-regression model, factors in favor of the prone position were PCR>10mg/L (OR=3.33), private healthcare network (OR=1.99), hypertension (OR=1,76), cough or dyspnea symptoms at intensive care admission (OR=2.69 and OR=1.91), oxygen saturation <90% (OR=1.84). Factors against the prone position were heart disease (OR=0.34), FiO2>50% (OR=0.32), and TP>13 seconds (OR=0.53). Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with a higher probability of prone position in intensive care were those with PCR>10mg/L, cough, dyspnea, and private healthcare network. The predictors identified in this study could help standardize the prone position therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Practice Today\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Practice Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i4.14079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Practice Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i4.14079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:临床建议对 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者进行通气管理,建议使用俯卧位作为辅助治疗,但在使用过程中存在很大差异。本研究旨在确定在重症监护病房住院的 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者使用俯卧位的预测因素。 方法与材料:研究对象为哥伦比亚四家医院重症监护室住院的 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征成年患者。建立了一个多重逻辑回归模型,其中主要结果是重症监护中的俯卧位,自变量包括社会人口学特征、病史、健康状况、病情进展和治疗。 结果本研究共纳入了 473 名患者,其中 59.8%(n=283)的患者在重症监护室住院 24-96 小时内接受了俯卧位治疗。在物流回归模型的所有符合条件的变量中,有利于采用俯卧位的因素有:PCR>10毫克/升(OR=3.33)、私人医疗网络(OR=1.99)、高血压(OR=1,76)、入院时出现咳嗽或呼吸困难症状(OR=2.69和OR=1.91)、血氧饱和度50%(OR=0.32)和TP>13秒(OR=0.53)。 结论COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,PCR>10毫克/升、咳嗽、呼吸困难和私人医疗网络的患者在重症监护中采取俯卧位的概率较高。本研究确定的预测因素有助于规范俯卧位疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study
Background & Aim: Clinical recommendations for ventilation management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome suggest the use of prone position as complementary therapy, however, there is wide variability in its use. The purpose of this study is to identify the predictor factors for using the prone position for patients hospitalized in intensive care units with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods & Materials: A Cross-sectional study was carried out, including adult patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome hospitalized in intensive care units of four hospitals in Colombia. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed in which the main outcome was the prone position in intensive care, and the independent variables included sociodemographic characteristics, history, health status, progress, and treatment. Results: A total of 473 patients were included in this study; 59.8% (n=283) received prone position therapy within 24-96 hours of hospitalization in intensive care. Out of the total of eligible variables in the logistics-regression model, factors in favor of the prone position were PCR>10mg/L (OR=3.33), private healthcare network (OR=1.99), hypertension (OR=1,76), cough or dyspnea symptoms at intensive care admission (OR=2.69 and OR=1.91), oxygen saturation <90% (OR=1.84). Factors against the prone position were heart disease (OR=0.34), FiO2>50% (OR=0.32), and TP>13 seconds (OR=0.53). Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with a higher probability of prone position in intensive care were those with PCR>10mg/L, cough, dyspnea, and private healthcare network. The predictors identified in this study could help standardize the prone position therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Practice Today
Nursing Practice Today Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信