仲裁中的集体补救还为时过早吗?- 欧洲视角下的界限与机遇

T. Z. Kamilovska, Tatjana Shterjova Dushkovska
{"title":"仲裁中的集体补救还为时过早吗?- 欧洲视角下的界限与机遇","authors":"T. Z. Kamilovska, Tatjana Shterjova Dushkovska","doi":"10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As has been often stated in judicial practice, collective redress simply reflects the rise of mass production, the diversification of corporate ownership, the advent of the mega-corporation, and the recognition of environmental wrongs. Although the American opt-out class actions are the first thing that comes to mind when one thinks of collective redress, European legislators have been particularly wary regarding the possibility of the US “toxic cocktail\" finding their way into European legislations. On the other hand, arbitration, in its basis, is a private way of resolving disputes which is a creation of the parties in the dispute. In its basis there must be consent of the parties to submit the particular dispute to be resolved in arbitration proceedings. Therefore, the possibility to incorporate collective redress mechanism in arbitration proceedings might raise many questions.","PeriodicalId":509601,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it Still Too Early for Collective Redress in Arbitration? – The Boundaries and Opportunities in European Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"T. Z. Kamilovska, Tatjana Shterjova Dushkovska\",\"doi\":\"10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As has been often stated in judicial practice, collective redress simply reflects the rise of mass production, the diversification of corporate ownership, the advent of the mega-corporation, and the recognition of environmental wrongs. Although the American opt-out class actions are the first thing that comes to mind when one thinks of collective redress, European legislators have been particularly wary regarding the possibility of the US “toxic cocktail\\\" finding their way into European legislations. On the other hand, arbitration, in its basis, is a private way of resolving disputes which is a creation of the parties in the dispute. In its basis there must be consent of the parties to submit the particular dispute to be resolved in arbitration proceedings. Therefore, the possibility to incorporate collective redress mechanism in arbitration proceedings might raise many questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如司法实践中经常提到的那样,集体救济只是反映了大规模生产的兴起、公司所有权的多样化、巨型公司的出现以及对环境错误的认识。虽然一提到集体救济,人们首先想到的是美国的选择退出集体诉讼,但欧洲的立法者对美国 "有毒鸡尾酒 "进入欧洲立法的可能性特别警惕。另一方面,仲裁在其基础上是一种解决争端的私人方式,是争端各方的创造。其基础必须是当事人同意将特定争议提交仲裁程序解决。因此,将集体补救机制纳入仲裁程序的可能性可能会引起许多问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it Still Too Early for Collective Redress in Arbitration? – The Boundaries and Opportunities in European Perspectives
As has been often stated in judicial practice, collective redress simply reflects the rise of mass production, the diversification of corporate ownership, the advent of the mega-corporation, and the recognition of environmental wrongs. Although the American opt-out class actions are the first thing that comes to mind when one thinks of collective redress, European legislators have been particularly wary regarding the possibility of the US “toxic cocktail" finding their way into European legislations. On the other hand, arbitration, in its basis, is a private way of resolving disputes which is a creation of the parties in the dispute. In its basis there must be consent of the parties to submit the particular dispute to be resolved in arbitration proceedings. Therefore, the possibility to incorporate collective redress mechanism in arbitration proceedings might raise many questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信