Chien-Hsiung Lo, Yu-Hua Dean Fang, Jing-Yao Wang, Tzu-Ping Yu, Hao-Chun Chuang, Yuan-Fu Liu, Chao-Jui Chang, Cheng-Li Lin
{"title":"股骨三维弯曲与脊柱矢状不平衡之间的关系","authors":"Chien-Hsiung Lo, Yu-Hua Dean Fang, Jing-Yao Wang, Tzu-Ping Yu, Hao-Chun Chuang, Yuan-Fu Liu, Chao-Jui Chang, Cheng-Li Lin","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.1305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The sagittal imbalance (SI) of spine triggers compensatory mechanisms (CMs) of lower extremity (LE) to restore trunk balance. These CMs can cause long-period stress on the femur and may possibly alter the femoral morphology. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to answer the following questions: (a) Do SI subjects exhibit greater femoral bowing compared to subjects with sagittal balance? (b) Are there associations between femoral bowing and CMs of LE in SI subjects?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Subjects who underwent biplanar full body radiographs with the EOS imaging system between January 2016 and September 2021 were recruited. Sagittal parameters included T1-pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, and PT/PI ratio. LE parameters were femoral obliquity angle (FOA), knee flexion angle (KA), and ankle dorsiflexion angle. Femoral bowing was quantified as 3D radius of femoral curvature (RFC). Associations between 3D RFC and the radiographic parameters were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 105 subjects were included, classified into balance group (TPA < 14°, <i>n</i> = 40), SI group (TPA ≥ 14° and KA <5°, <i>n</i> = 30), and SI with knee flexion group (TPA ≥ 14° and KA ≥ 5°, <i>n</i> = 35). 3D RFC was significantly lower in SI with knee flexion group compared to the other two groups (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Stepwise linear regression showed that age, SI and knee flexion, femoral length (FL), FOA, and KA were independent predictors for 3D RFC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Greater femoral bowing is observed in subjects with SI and knee flexion compared to the balanced population. CM parameters, including KA and FOA, are associated with 3D RFC. Further longitudinal study is needed to investigate the cause-and-effect relationship between SI, CMs of LE, and femoral bowing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.1305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between femoral 3D curvature and sagittal imbalance of spine\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Hsiung Lo, Yu-Hua Dean Fang, Jing-Yao Wang, Tzu-Ping Yu, Hao-Chun Chuang, Yuan-Fu Liu, Chao-Jui Chang, Cheng-Li Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsp2.1305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sagittal imbalance (SI) of spine triggers compensatory mechanisms (CMs) of lower extremity (LE) to restore trunk balance. These CMs can cause long-period stress on the femur and may possibly alter the femoral morphology. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to answer the following questions: (a) Do SI subjects exhibit greater femoral bowing compared to subjects with sagittal balance? (b) Are there associations between femoral bowing and CMs of LE in SI subjects?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Subjects who underwent biplanar full body radiographs with the EOS imaging system between January 2016 and September 2021 were recruited. Sagittal parameters included T1-pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, and PT/PI ratio. LE parameters were femoral obliquity angle (FOA), knee flexion angle (KA), and ankle dorsiflexion angle. Femoral bowing was quantified as 3D radius of femoral curvature (RFC). Associations between 3D RFC and the radiographic parameters were analyzed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 105 subjects were included, classified into balance group (TPA < 14°, <i>n</i> = 40), SI group (TPA ≥ 14° and KA <5°, <i>n</i> = 30), and SI with knee flexion group (TPA ≥ 14° and KA ≥ 5°, <i>n</i> = 35). 3D RFC was significantly lower in SI with knee flexion group compared to the other two groups (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Stepwise linear regression showed that age, SI and knee flexion, femoral length (FL), FOA, and KA were independent predictors for 3D RFC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Greater femoral bowing is observed in subjects with SI and knee flexion compared to the balanced population. CM parameters, including KA and FOA, are associated with 3D RFC. Further longitudinal study is needed to investigate the cause-and-effect relationship between SI, CMs of LE, and femoral bowing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOR Spine\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.1305\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOR Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.1305\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.1305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
脊柱的矢状失衡(SI)会触发下肢(LE)的补偿机制(CM),以恢复躯干平衡。这些代偿机制会对股骨造成长期压力,并可能改变股骨形态。这项横断面观察性研究旨在回答以下问题:(a)与矢状平衡受试者相比,SI 受试者是否表现出更大的股骨弯曲?(b) SI 受试者的股骨弯曲与 LE 的 CMs 之间是否存在关联?矢状面参数包括 T1-骨盆角 (TPA)、骨盆入射角 (PI)、骨盆倾斜 (PT)、骶骨斜度、腰椎前凸 (LL)、PI-LL 和 PT/PI 比值。LE参数为股骨倾斜角(FOA)、膝关节屈曲角(KA)和踝关节背屈角。股骨弯曲以三维股骨曲率半径(RFC)量化。共纳入105名受试者,分为平衡组(TPA<14°,n=40)、SI组(TPA≥14°且KA<5°,n=30)和膝关节屈曲SI组(TPA≥14°且KA≥5°,n=35)。与其他两组相比,膝关节屈曲的 SI 组的 3D RFC 明显较低(均 p <0.001)。逐步线性回归显示,年龄、SI和膝关节屈曲度、股骨长度(FL)、FOA和KA是三维RFC的独立预测因子。包括 KA 和 FOA 在内的 CM 参数与 3D RFC 相关。需要进一步的纵向研究来探讨SI、LE的CMs和股骨弯曲之间的因果关系。
Associations between femoral 3D curvature and sagittal imbalance of spine
Background
The sagittal imbalance (SI) of spine triggers compensatory mechanisms (CMs) of lower extremity (LE) to restore trunk balance. These CMs can cause long-period stress on the femur and may possibly alter the femoral morphology. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to answer the following questions: (a) Do SI subjects exhibit greater femoral bowing compared to subjects with sagittal balance? (b) Are there associations between femoral bowing and CMs of LE in SI subjects?
Methods
Subjects who underwent biplanar full body radiographs with the EOS imaging system between January 2016 and September 2021 were recruited. Sagittal parameters included T1-pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, and PT/PI ratio. LE parameters were femoral obliquity angle (FOA), knee flexion angle (KA), and ankle dorsiflexion angle. Femoral bowing was quantified as 3D radius of femoral curvature (RFC). Associations between 3D RFC and the radiographic parameters were analyzed.
Results
A total of 105 subjects were included, classified into balance group (TPA < 14°, n = 40), SI group (TPA ≥ 14° and KA <5°, n = 30), and SI with knee flexion group (TPA ≥ 14° and KA ≥ 5°, n = 35). 3D RFC was significantly lower in SI with knee flexion group compared to the other two groups (both p < 0.001). Stepwise linear regression showed that age, SI and knee flexion, femoral length (FL), FOA, and KA were independent predictors for 3D RFC.
Conclusion
Greater femoral bowing is observed in subjects with SI and knee flexion compared to the balanced population. CM parameters, including KA and FOA, are associated with 3D RFC. Further longitudinal study is needed to investigate the cause-and-effect relationship between SI, CMs of LE, and femoral bowing.