这不是出口:会计教育,试图摆脱资本主义现实主义的 "牢笼"

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
David Yates, Muhammad Al Mahameed
{"title":"这不是出口:会计教育,试图摆脱资本主义现实主义的 \"牢笼\"","authors":"David Yates, Muhammad Al Mahameed","doi":"10.1108/arj-06-2022-0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Through this reflexive, theoretically informed polemical piece, this paper aims to seek to reflect on the role of accounting education in United Kingdom Higher Education (UKHE). The authors reignite an old, but pertinent debate, whether accounting graduates should be educated to be accountants or receive a holistic, critical education. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt a theoretical position drawing on the work of Slavoj Žižek and Mark Fisher, and their fusion of Lacanian psychoanalysis and Marxism, in particular Fisher’s (2009) conceptualisation of “capitalist realism” to take a critical standpoint on the effects that UKHE marketisation is having on the teaching of accounting and other business-related disciplines. Findings The authors outline four key aspects of where accounting education in UKHE is influenced by capitalist realism, as a result of the marketisation of UKHE. Research limitations/implications The paper is a reflexive polemic and so is limited by this written style and presentation. Social implications The authors argue that capitalist realism is a dominant theme that influences accounting education. They propose that universities now, more than ever, must focus on their societal duty to foster critical viewpoints in their graduates and dispose of a model that is subject to capitalist realism ontology. Originality/value The theoretical stance allows for a potentially deeper consideration of issues surrounding marketisation of higher education, from the micro level of social interaction (that of the accounting academic and their impact/perceptions of the reality).","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":"240 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This is not an exit: accounting education and attempting to escape the capitalist realist “cage”\",\"authors\":\"David Yates, Muhammad Al Mahameed\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/arj-06-2022-0144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Through this reflexive, theoretically informed polemical piece, this paper aims to seek to reflect on the role of accounting education in United Kingdom Higher Education (UKHE). The authors reignite an old, but pertinent debate, whether accounting graduates should be educated to be accountants or receive a holistic, critical education. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt a theoretical position drawing on the work of Slavoj Žižek and Mark Fisher, and their fusion of Lacanian psychoanalysis and Marxism, in particular Fisher’s (2009) conceptualisation of “capitalist realism” to take a critical standpoint on the effects that UKHE marketisation is having on the teaching of accounting and other business-related disciplines. Findings The authors outline four key aspects of where accounting education in UKHE is influenced by capitalist realism, as a result of the marketisation of UKHE. Research limitations/implications The paper is a reflexive polemic and so is limited by this written style and presentation. Social implications The authors argue that capitalist realism is a dominant theme that influences accounting education. They propose that universities now, more than ever, must focus on their societal duty to foster critical viewpoints in their graduates and dispose of a model that is subject to capitalist realism ontology. Originality/value The theoretical stance allows for a potentially deeper consideration of issues surrounding marketisation of higher education, from the micro level of social interaction (that of the accounting academic and their impact/perceptions of the reality).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"240 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-06-2022-0144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-06-2022-0144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 通过这篇具有反思性、理论性的论战文章,本文旨在反思会计教育在英国高等教育(UKHE)中的作用。作者再次引发了一场古老而又相关的辩论,即会计专业的毕业生应该接受会计师教育,还是接受全面的批判性教育。 设计/方法/途径 作者采用的理论立场借鉴了斯拉沃伊-齐泽克(Slavoj Žižek)和马克-费舍尔(Mark Fisher)的研究成果,以及他们将拉康式精神分析与马克思主义,特别是费舍尔(2009 年)的 "资本主义现实主义 "概念相融合的观点,以批判性的立场看待英国高等教育市场化对会计及其他商业相关学科教学的影响。 研究结果 作者概述了英国高等教育市场化对英国会计教育产生资本主义现实主义影响的四个关键方面。 研究局限/影响 本文是一篇反思性的论战文章,因此受到这种写作风格和表达方式的限制。 社会影响 作者认为,资本主义现实主义是影响会计教育的主导主题。他们提出,大学现在比以往任何时候都更有必要关注其社会责任,培养毕业生的批判性观点,摒弃受制于资本主义现实主义本体论的模式。 原创性/价值 这一理论立场使我们有可能从社会互动的微观层面(会计学术界及其对现实的影响/看法)更深入地思考高等教育市场化的相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
This is not an exit: accounting education and attempting to escape the capitalist realist “cage”
Purpose Through this reflexive, theoretically informed polemical piece, this paper aims to seek to reflect on the role of accounting education in United Kingdom Higher Education (UKHE). The authors reignite an old, but pertinent debate, whether accounting graduates should be educated to be accountants or receive a holistic, critical education. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt a theoretical position drawing on the work of Slavoj Žižek and Mark Fisher, and their fusion of Lacanian psychoanalysis and Marxism, in particular Fisher’s (2009) conceptualisation of “capitalist realism” to take a critical standpoint on the effects that UKHE marketisation is having on the teaching of accounting and other business-related disciplines. Findings The authors outline four key aspects of where accounting education in UKHE is influenced by capitalist realism, as a result of the marketisation of UKHE. Research limitations/implications The paper is a reflexive polemic and so is limited by this written style and presentation. Social implications The authors argue that capitalist realism is a dominant theme that influences accounting education. They propose that universities now, more than ever, must focus on their societal duty to foster critical viewpoints in their graduates and dispose of a model that is subject to capitalist realism ontology. Originality/value The theoretical stance allows for a potentially deeper consideration of issues surrounding marketisation of higher education, from the micro level of social interaction (that of the accounting academic and their impact/perceptions of the reality).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信