{"title":"对商用传染性支气管炎病毒酶联免疫测定试剂盒的评估","authors":"Yen-Pei Tan, Ching-Ho Wang","doi":"10.1142/s1682648523500051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Taiwan, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is mainly restricted to two groups Taiwan Group I (TW-I) and Taiwan Group II (TW-II) that are distinct from other countries. To evaluate the reliability of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, imported commercial test kits (namely, A, B and C) were used to test field samples. The results were further compared with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test to figure out the consistency. Results showed that the three commercial ELISA kits had only partial consistency with HI results. In fact, testing results of breeders and layers bore resemblance to HI, whereas there were ELISAs negatively detecting results of broilers opposed in HI. The specificities of these ELISA kits were 0.45, 0.86 and 0.77 for kits A, B and C, respectively, and their sensitivities were 0.79, 0.68 and 0.70, respectively. The commercial ELISA kits may not sustainably provide us the whole view of birds infected or vaccinated status. Based on the results of in-house ELISA and western blot, different IBV strains showed different antigen–antibody interaction. Thus, different ELISA coatings with different antigens might result in different antibody titers. Furthermore, according to HI results, 91% (256) and 70% (198) of the 282 tested sera were positive to H120 (as a Massachusetts vaccine) and 3263/04 (as a field strain), respectively. These high positive rates indicate that in spite of popular use of Massachusetts vaccines, the chickens are still commonly infected with field IBVs in Taiwan.","PeriodicalId":22157,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Veterinary Journal","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL INFECTIOUS BRONCHITIS VIRUS ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAY KITS\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Pei Tan, Ching-Ho Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s1682648523500051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Taiwan, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is mainly restricted to two groups Taiwan Group I (TW-I) and Taiwan Group II (TW-II) that are distinct from other countries. To evaluate the reliability of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, imported commercial test kits (namely, A, B and C) were used to test field samples. The results were further compared with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test to figure out the consistency. Results showed that the three commercial ELISA kits had only partial consistency with HI results. In fact, testing results of breeders and layers bore resemblance to HI, whereas there were ELISAs negatively detecting results of broilers opposed in HI. The specificities of these ELISA kits were 0.45, 0.86 and 0.77 for kits A, B and C, respectively, and their sensitivities were 0.79, 0.68 and 0.70, respectively. The commercial ELISA kits may not sustainably provide us the whole view of birds infected or vaccinated status. Based on the results of in-house ELISA and western blot, different IBV strains showed different antigen–antibody interaction. Thus, different ELISA coatings with different antigens might result in different antibody titers. Furthermore, according to HI results, 91% (256) and 70% (198) of the 282 tested sera were positive to H120 (as a Massachusetts vaccine) and 3263/04 (as a field strain), respectively. These high positive rates indicate that in spite of popular use of Massachusetts vaccines, the chickens are still commonly infected with field IBVs in Taiwan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1682648523500051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1682648523500051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在台湾,传染性支气管炎病毒(IBV)主要局限于台湾 I 组(TW-I)和台湾 II 组(TW-II)两个组别,与其他国家有所不同。为了评估商用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)试剂盒的可靠性,我们使用了进口的商用试验试剂盒(即 A、B 和 C)来检测现场样本。将检测结果与血凝抑制(HI)试验进一步比较,以确定其一致性。结果显示,三种商用 ELISA 试剂盒与 HI 结果只有部分一致性。事实上,种鸡和蛋鸡的检测结果与 HI 相似,而与 HI 相反的肉鸡 ELISA 检测结果呈阴性。这些 ELISA 试剂盒 A、B 和 C 的特异性分别为 0.45、0.86 和 0.77,灵敏度分别为 0.79、0.68 和 0.70。商用酶联免疫吸附试剂盒可能无法为我们提供鸟类感染或接种情况的全貌。根据内部 ELISA 和 Western 印迹的结果,不同的 IBV 株系表现出不同的抗原-抗体相互作用。因此,不同抗原的 ELISA 涂层可能会导致不同的抗体滴度。此外,根据 HI 检测结果,在 282 份检测血清中,分别有 91%(256 份)和 70%(198 份)对 H120(马萨诸塞州疫苗)和 3263/04(野外毒株)呈阳性反应。这些高阳性率表明,尽管马萨诸塞州疫苗已被广泛使用,但在台湾,鸡只仍普遍感染野外 IBV。
EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL INFECTIOUS BRONCHITIS VIRUS ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAY KITS
In Taiwan, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is mainly restricted to two groups Taiwan Group I (TW-I) and Taiwan Group II (TW-II) that are distinct from other countries. To evaluate the reliability of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, imported commercial test kits (namely, A, B and C) were used to test field samples. The results were further compared with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test to figure out the consistency. Results showed that the three commercial ELISA kits had only partial consistency with HI results. In fact, testing results of breeders and layers bore resemblance to HI, whereas there were ELISAs negatively detecting results of broilers opposed in HI. The specificities of these ELISA kits were 0.45, 0.86 and 0.77 for kits A, B and C, respectively, and their sensitivities were 0.79, 0.68 and 0.70, respectively. The commercial ELISA kits may not sustainably provide us the whole view of birds infected or vaccinated status. Based on the results of in-house ELISA and western blot, different IBV strains showed different antigen–antibody interaction. Thus, different ELISA coatings with different antigens might result in different antibody titers. Furthermore, according to HI results, 91% (256) and 70% (198) of the 282 tested sera were positive to H120 (as a Massachusetts vaccine) and 3263/04 (as a field strain), respectively. These high positive rates indicate that in spite of popular use of Massachusetts vaccines, the chickens are still commonly infected with field IBVs in Taiwan.