利用磁共振成像和深度学习检测颅内肿瘤

Sibtain Syed, Maqbool Khan, Rehan Ahmed, Syed Muhammad Talha
{"title":"利用磁共振成像和深度学习检测颅内肿瘤","authors":"Sibtain Syed, Maqbool Khan, Rehan Ahmed, Syed Muhammad Talha","doi":"10.54938/ijemdcsai.2023.02.1.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An intracranial tumor is a malignant Central Nervous System (CNS) cancer that significantly contributes to global mortality. Timely prediction of these brain tumors can improve the survival rates of a patient. Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) have emerged as effective non-invasive ways to extract 2D or 3D images of human internal organs, eliminating any pain or surgical procedures. However, analyzing and distinguishing the normal and abnormal tissue is a challenging task. Due to this implying Datadriven approaches, could be a pragmatic way to efficiently classify and detect regions of malignancy of a tumor. The scope of this study is to efficiently predict Brain tumors and their location by employing sophisticated optimized Deep learning models like Convolutional neural Networks (CNN) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) through limited MRI images dataset of human brain. The dataset acquired from kaggle is comprised of 253 MRI images covering different angles of the human brain. The images were of different sizes and shapes, to standardize them data preprocessing simulations were made including resizing, normalizing, etc. For better categorization of model, the images were also converted to binary format (0, 1) by the One Hot Encoding technique. The ratio of training and testing data was taken as 90:10. For CNN and LSTM model, suitable hyperparameters were selected through the trial-and-error technique to ensure the best optimization of the model on the implied training data. The loss and accuracy graph depicts optimized validation and accuracy losses indicating the model to call back early stopping to save computational cost. The predicted labels for both the models and actual label were compared by a confusion matrix which showed accuracy, specificity, recall, and misclassification error to be 91.51, 92.85, 90.12, and 8.49 on average for CNN,while 95.54, 92.86, 94.2, and 5.805 for LSTM model, respectively.","PeriodicalId":448083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial Tumor Detection using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"Sibtain Syed, Maqbool Khan, Rehan Ahmed, Syed Muhammad Talha\",\"doi\":\"10.54938/ijemdcsai.2023.02.1.239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An intracranial tumor is a malignant Central Nervous System (CNS) cancer that significantly contributes to global mortality. Timely prediction of these brain tumors can improve the survival rates of a patient. Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) have emerged as effective non-invasive ways to extract 2D or 3D images of human internal organs, eliminating any pain or surgical procedures. However, analyzing and distinguishing the normal and abnormal tissue is a challenging task. Due to this implying Datadriven approaches, could be a pragmatic way to efficiently classify and detect regions of malignancy of a tumor. The scope of this study is to efficiently predict Brain tumors and their location by employing sophisticated optimized Deep learning models like Convolutional neural Networks (CNN) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) through limited MRI images dataset of human brain. The dataset acquired from kaggle is comprised of 253 MRI images covering different angles of the human brain. The images were of different sizes and shapes, to standardize them data preprocessing simulations were made including resizing, normalizing, etc. For better categorization of model, the images were also converted to binary format (0, 1) by the One Hot Encoding technique. The ratio of training and testing data was taken as 90:10. For CNN and LSTM model, suitable hyperparameters were selected through the trial-and-error technique to ensure the best optimization of the model on the implied training data. The loss and accuracy graph depicts optimized validation and accuracy losses indicating the model to call back early stopping to save computational cost. The predicted labels for both the models and actual label were compared by a confusion matrix which showed accuracy, specificity, recall, and misclassification error to be 91.51, 92.85, 90.12, and 8.49 on average for CNN,while 95.54, 92.86, 94.2, and 5.805 for LSTM model, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdcsai.2023.02.1.239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries: Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemdcsai.2023.02.1.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内肿瘤是一种恶性中枢神经系统(CNS)癌症,是导致全球死亡率的重要因素。及时预测这些脑肿瘤可以提高患者的生存率。磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)已成为提取人体内部器官二维或三维图像的有效非侵入性方法,消除了任何疼痛或手术过程。然而,分析和区分正常与异常组织是一项具有挑战性的任务。因此,数据驱动方法可能是一种有效分类和检测肿瘤恶性区域的实用方法。本研究的目的是通过有限的人脑核磁共振成像数据集,采用卷积神经网络(CNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)等复杂优化的深度学习模型,有效预测脑肿瘤及其位置。从 kaggle 获取的数据集由 253 幅磁共振成像图像组成,涵盖了人脑的不同角度。这些图像的大小和形状各不相同,为了使它们标准化,我们进行了数据预处理模拟,包括调整大小、归一化等。为了更好地对模型进行分类,还通过单热编码技术将图像转换为二进制格式(0,1)。训练数据和测试数据的比例为 90:10。对于 CNN 和 LSTM 模型,通过试错技术选择了合适的超参数,以确保在隐含的训练数据上对模型进行最佳优化。损失和准确率图描述了优化后的验证损失和准确率损失,表明模型会提前停止,以节省计算成本。混淆矩阵比较了两个模型的预测标签和实际标签,结果显示 CNN 的准确率、特异性、召回率和误判误差平均分别为 91.51、92.85、90.12 和 8.49,而 LSTM 模型的准确率、特异性、召回率和误判误差平均分别为 95.54、92.86、94.2 和 5.805。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial Tumor Detection using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Deep Learning
An intracranial tumor is a malignant Central Nervous System (CNS) cancer that significantly contributes to global mortality. Timely prediction of these brain tumors can improve the survival rates of a patient. Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) have emerged as effective non-invasive ways to extract 2D or 3D images of human internal organs, eliminating any pain or surgical procedures. However, analyzing and distinguishing the normal and abnormal tissue is a challenging task. Due to this implying Datadriven approaches, could be a pragmatic way to efficiently classify and detect regions of malignancy of a tumor. The scope of this study is to efficiently predict Brain tumors and their location by employing sophisticated optimized Deep learning models like Convolutional neural Networks (CNN) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) through limited MRI images dataset of human brain. The dataset acquired from kaggle is comprised of 253 MRI images covering different angles of the human brain. The images were of different sizes and shapes, to standardize them data preprocessing simulations were made including resizing, normalizing, etc. For better categorization of model, the images were also converted to binary format (0, 1) by the One Hot Encoding technique. The ratio of training and testing data was taken as 90:10. For CNN and LSTM model, suitable hyperparameters were selected through the trial-and-error technique to ensure the best optimization of the model on the implied training data. The loss and accuracy graph depicts optimized validation and accuracy losses indicating the model to call back early stopping to save computational cost. The predicted labels for both the models and actual label were compared by a confusion matrix which showed accuracy, specificity, recall, and misclassification error to be 91.51, 92.85, 90.12, and 8.49 on average for CNN,while 95.54, 92.86, 94.2, and 5.805 for LSTM model, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信