培训计划是否解决了反黑人种族主义和白人至上主义问题?描述性分析

Melanie M. Wilcox, Laura Reid Marks, Danielle N. Franks, Rosie Phillips Davis, Tierra Moss
{"title":"培训计划是否解决了反黑人种族主义和白人至上主义问题?描述性分析","authors":"Melanie M. Wilcox, Laura Reid Marks, Danielle N. Franks, Rosie Phillips Davis, Tierra Moss","doi":"10.1177/00110000231214282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Counseling psychology increasingly centers addressing and dismantling anti-Black racism and White supremacy among its values. It is unclear, however, whether training programs are attending to antiracist paradigm shifts. We conducted a study of counseling psychology programs’ attention to antiracism and White supremacy. Students and faculty in counseling psychology programs were asked to complete an online survey. Faculty were also asked to submit multicultural course syllabi. Qualitative results demonstrate that syllabi (N = 29) generally do not reflect modern antiracist paradigms. Both faculty and student participants (N = 179) rate their programs as above-average on social justice and antiracism commitments, social justice program norms, and multicultural training, but students (n = 127) observed greater discrepancies between what their programs claim to do and what their programs actually do; and, faculty (n = 52) rate their programs more positively than students. There also appeared to be individual-level differences in ethnic-racial identity, such that White students were more critical of Whiteness.","PeriodicalId":506375,"journal":{"name":"The Counseling Psychologist","volume":"26 1","pages":"124 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Training Programs Addressing Anti-Black Racism and White Supremacy? A Descriptive Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Melanie M. Wilcox, Laura Reid Marks, Danielle N. Franks, Rosie Phillips Davis, Tierra Moss\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00110000231214282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Counseling psychology increasingly centers addressing and dismantling anti-Black racism and White supremacy among its values. It is unclear, however, whether training programs are attending to antiracist paradigm shifts. We conducted a study of counseling psychology programs’ attention to antiracism and White supremacy. Students and faculty in counseling psychology programs were asked to complete an online survey. Faculty were also asked to submit multicultural course syllabi. Qualitative results demonstrate that syllabi (N = 29) generally do not reflect modern antiracist paradigms. Both faculty and student participants (N = 179) rate their programs as above-average on social justice and antiracism commitments, social justice program norms, and multicultural training, but students (n = 127) observed greater discrepancies between what their programs claim to do and what their programs actually do; and, faculty (n = 52) rate their programs more positively than students. There also appeared to be individual-level differences in ethnic-racial identity, such that White students were more critical of Whiteness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Counseling Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"124 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Counseling Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231214282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Counseling Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231214282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

咨询心理学越来越多地将解决和消除反黑人种族主义和白人至上主义作为其价值观的中心。然而,目前还不清楚培训项目是否关注反种族主义范式的转变。我们对咨询心理学课程对反种族主义和白人至上主义的关注进行了研究。我们要求心理咨询专业的学生和教师完成一份在线调查。同时还要求教师提交多元文化课程大纲。定性结果表明,教学大纲(N = 29)普遍没有反映现代反种族主义范式。教师和学生参与者(人数=179)都认为他们的课程在社会公正和反种族主义承诺、社会公正课程规范和多元文化培训方面高于平均水平,但学生(人数=127)观察到他们的课程声称要做的与实际做的之间存在更大的差异;而且,教师(人数=52)对他们课程的评价比学生更积极。在民族-种族认同方面似乎也存在个体差异,例如白人学生对白人的批判性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Training Programs Addressing Anti-Black Racism and White Supremacy? A Descriptive Analysis
Counseling psychology increasingly centers addressing and dismantling anti-Black racism and White supremacy among its values. It is unclear, however, whether training programs are attending to antiracist paradigm shifts. We conducted a study of counseling psychology programs’ attention to antiracism and White supremacy. Students and faculty in counseling psychology programs were asked to complete an online survey. Faculty were also asked to submit multicultural course syllabi. Qualitative results demonstrate that syllabi (N = 29) generally do not reflect modern antiracist paradigms. Both faculty and student participants (N = 179) rate their programs as above-average on social justice and antiracism commitments, social justice program norms, and multicultural training, but students (n = 127) observed greater discrepancies between what their programs claim to do and what their programs actually do; and, faculty (n = 52) rate their programs more positively than students. There also appeared to be individual-level differences in ethnic-racial identity, such that White students were more critical of Whiteness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信