{"title":"探索我们的开放式教育实践,支持卓越的研究生教育:合作式自述","authors":"Pamela Walsh, Cindy Ives, Beth Perry","doi":"10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.1.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the findings of our exploration of our open educational practices (OEP) with graduate students. As reflective practitioners, we used a self-study methodology and collaborative autoethnographic methods to interrogate our open approaches to teaching and supervision. We draw on our developing competencies to support the wisdom, critical thinking, resilience, and adaptability of our graduate students. The article extends preliminary findings about graduate education and open practices in relation to and emerging from earlier work (Ives et al., 2022), which committed us to further exploration of our practices. Using our definition of OEP which expands on the work of several open scholars, we report new findings from our in-depth collaborative analysis of data collected over two years. We found a gap in the literature examining the use of OEP with graduate students. Findings include OEP and their alignment with our values and competencies, as well as OEP within our teaching, course design, and graduate supervisory practices. We offer insights into the outcomes of our practices for students and ourselves, and ways we can improve.","PeriodicalId":242908,"journal":{"name":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring our Open Educational Practices in Support of Excellence in Graduate Education: A Collaborative Autoethnography\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Walsh, Cindy Ives, Beth Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.1.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the findings of our exploration of our open educational practices (OEP) with graduate students. As reflective practitioners, we used a self-study methodology and collaborative autoethnographic methods to interrogate our open approaches to teaching and supervision. We draw on our developing competencies to support the wisdom, critical thinking, resilience, and adaptability of our graduate students. The article extends preliminary findings about graduate education and open practices in relation to and emerging from earlier work (Ives et al., 2022), which committed us to further exploration of our practices. Using our definition of OEP which expands on the work of several open scholars, we report new findings from our in-depth collaborative analysis of data collected over two years. We found a gap in the literature examining the use of OEP with graduate students. Findings include OEP and their alignment with our values and competencies, as well as OEP within our teaching, course design, and graduate supervisory practices. We offer insights into the outcomes of our practices for students and ourselves, and ways we can improve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.1.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.1.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文介绍了我们对研究生开放式教育实践(OEP)的探索结果。作为反思实践者,我们采用了自我研究方法和合作式自述方法来审视我们的开放式教学和指导方法。我们利用自己不断发展的能力,为研究生的智慧、批判性思维、应变能力和适应能力提供支持。这篇文章扩展了关于研究生教育和开放实践的初步研究成果,这些研究成果与之前的工作(Ives et al.我们对开放教育实践的定义是在几位开放学者的工作基础上扩展而来的,我们通过对两年来收集的数据进行深入的合作分析,报告了我们的新发现。我们发现,在研究研究生使用开放式教学法的文献中存在空白。研究结果包括开放式教学方法及其与我们的价值观和能力的一致性,以及在我们的教学、课程设计和研究生指导实践中的开放式教学方法。我们对我们的做法给学生和我们自己带来的结果以及我们可以改进的方法提出了自己的见解。
Exploring our Open Educational Practices in Support of Excellence in Graduate Education: A Collaborative Autoethnography
This paper presents the findings of our exploration of our open educational practices (OEP) with graduate students. As reflective practitioners, we used a self-study methodology and collaborative autoethnographic methods to interrogate our open approaches to teaching and supervision. We draw on our developing competencies to support the wisdom, critical thinking, resilience, and adaptability of our graduate students. The article extends preliminary findings about graduate education and open practices in relation to and emerging from earlier work (Ives et al., 2022), which committed us to further exploration of our practices. Using our definition of OEP which expands on the work of several open scholars, we report new findings from our in-depth collaborative analysis of data collected over two years. We found a gap in the literature examining the use of OEP with graduate students. Findings include OEP and their alignment with our values and competencies, as well as OEP within our teaching, course design, and graduate supervisory practices. We offer insights into the outcomes of our practices for students and ourselves, and ways we can improve.