用手工计算和有限元法比较研究 IWF 型材、六角形梁和八角形梁的强度

Rezaldi Pramanda Zarmihan, Vitta Pratiwi, Sutedjo Krisnadi
{"title":"用手工计算和有限元法比较研究 IWF 型材、六角形梁和八角形梁的强度","authors":"Rezaldi Pramanda Zarmihan, Vitta Pratiwi, Sutedjo Krisnadi","doi":"10.35139/cantilever.v11i2.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A castellated beam is formed from the IWF body profile cutting pattern, and the cuts are then adjusted between the pieces and then welded to put them back together. The advantage of modifying the IWF profile into a castellated beam is that it can increase the moment of inertia of the section (Ix), and this increase affects the bending capacity of the castellated beam profile and the ability of the profile to withstand loads. However, these profile modifications have limitations that are used to minimize the occurrence of extreme failures, and one of the limitations is that the modified profile may not exceed 50% of the height increase from the initial profile height. In this study, the profile capabilities of IWF, Hexagonal Beam, and Octagonal Beam will be compared with a total of 3 models of centralized loads that can be carried. In this study, two methods will be used, namely manual calculation and finite element method. From the results of the analysis that has been carried out with both methods, it can be seen that the effect of modifying the IWF profile into hexagonal beams and octagonal beams can increase the load capacity of the profiles. However, the highest profile capability increase occurred in model 1 or IWF profile 150x75x5x7, which was modified to model 2 or hexagonal beam 220x75x5x7. The increase in the profile was 34.83% for manual method calculations and finite element method calculations, an increase of 12.15 %. The highest comparison between the manual calculation method and the finite element method occurs in the hexagonal profile beam measuring 240x75x5x7 with a difference of 21.39%. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded from the three profiles that it is better if the profile used is model 2.","PeriodicalId":338977,"journal":{"name":"Cantilever: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Bidang Teknik Sipil","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studi Perbandingan Kekuatan Profil IWF, Hexagonal Beam dan Octagonal Beam dengan Perhitungan Manual dan Metode Elemen Hingga\",\"authors\":\"Rezaldi Pramanda Zarmihan, Vitta Pratiwi, Sutedjo Krisnadi\",\"doi\":\"10.35139/cantilever.v11i2.165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A castellated beam is formed from the IWF body profile cutting pattern, and the cuts are then adjusted between the pieces and then welded to put them back together. The advantage of modifying the IWF profile into a castellated beam is that it can increase the moment of inertia of the section (Ix), and this increase affects the bending capacity of the castellated beam profile and the ability of the profile to withstand loads. However, these profile modifications have limitations that are used to minimize the occurrence of extreme failures, and one of the limitations is that the modified profile may not exceed 50% of the height increase from the initial profile height. In this study, the profile capabilities of IWF, Hexagonal Beam, and Octagonal Beam will be compared with a total of 3 models of centralized loads that can be carried. In this study, two methods will be used, namely manual calculation and finite element method. From the results of the analysis that has been carried out with both methods, it can be seen that the effect of modifying the IWF profile into hexagonal beams and octagonal beams can increase the load capacity of the profiles. However, the highest profile capability increase occurred in model 1 or IWF profile 150x75x5x7, which was modified to model 2 or hexagonal beam 220x75x5x7. The increase in the profile was 34.83% for manual method calculations and finite element method calculations, an increase of 12.15 %. The highest comparison between the manual calculation method and the finite element method occurs in the hexagonal profile beam measuring 240x75x5x7 with a difference of 21.39%. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded from the three profiles that it is better if the profile used is model 2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cantilever: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Bidang Teknik Sipil\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cantilever: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Bidang Teknik Sipil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35139/cantilever.v11i2.165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cantilever: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Bidang Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35139/cantilever.v11i2.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 IWF 车身轮廓切割模式形成浇注梁,然后调整各部分之间的切割,再将它们焊接在一起。将 IWF 型材修改为浇注梁的优点是可以增加截面的惯性矩(Ix),而惯性矩的增加会影响浇注梁型材的抗弯能力和型材承受载荷的能力。然而,这些剖面修改都有限制条件,用于最大限度地减少极端故障的发生,其中一个限制条件是修改后的剖面高度不得超过初始剖面高度的 50%。在本研究中,将对 IWF、六角形梁和八角形梁的轮廓能力与可承载的共 3 种集中荷载模型进行比较。本研究将采用两种方法,即手工计算法和有限元法。从这两种方法的分析结果可以看出,将 IWF 剖面修改为六边形梁和八边形梁可以提高剖面的承载能力。然而,型材承载能力增幅最大的是模型 1 或 150x75x5x7 的 IWF 型材,将其修改为模型 2 或 220x75x5x7 的六边形梁。手动计算法和有限元法计算的剖面增加率分别为 34.83%和 12.15%。手动计算法与有限元法的最高比较出现在尺寸为 240x75x5x7 的六边形剖面梁上,差值为 21.39%。根据已完成的研究,可以从三种型材中得出结论,如果使用的型材是模型 2,效果会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studi Perbandingan Kekuatan Profil IWF, Hexagonal Beam dan Octagonal Beam dengan Perhitungan Manual dan Metode Elemen Hingga
A castellated beam is formed from the IWF body profile cutting pattern, and the cuts are then adjusted between the pieces and then welded to put them back together. The advantage of modifying the IWF profile into a castellated beam is that it can increase the moment of inertia of the section (Ix), and this increase affects the bending capacity of the castellated beam profile and the ability of the profile to withstand loads. However, these profile modifications have limitations that are used to minimize the occurrence of extreme failures, and one of the limitations is that the modified profile may not exceed 50% of the height increase from the initial profile height. In this study, the profile capabilities of IWF, Hexagonal Beam, and Octagonal Beam will be compared with a total of 3 models of centralized loads that can be carried. In this study, two methods will be used, namely manual calculation and finite element method. From the results of the analysis that has been carried out with both methods, it can be seen that the effect of modifying the IWF profile into hexagonal beams and octagonal beams can increase the load capacity of the profiles. However, the highest profile capability increase occurred in model 1 or IWF profile 150x75x5x7, which was modified to model 2 or hexagonal beam 220x75x5x7. The increase in the profile was 34.83% for manual method calculations and finite element method calculations, an increase of 12.15 %. The highest comparison between the manual calculation method and the finite element method occurs in the hexagonal profile beam measuring 240x75x5x7 with a difference of 21.39%. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded from the three profiles that it is better if the profile used is model 2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信