新旧飞利浦心导管成像系统比较

Faleh Alqahtani, Majed Battah Alshammari, Turki Saleh Alduhaim, Najla Awadh Alanazi, Jaber Ali Alshehri, Fatimah Almasoudi, Abdullah M. Alanazi, Ali Al Shahrani, Uttam Kopadre, Nawaf Al Harbi, Yazeed Al Harbi, Waleed Al Moutiri, Mohammed Al Yousef, Ibrahim Al Drim, Abdulrahman Al Harbi, Azzam AlOtaib, Abdulrahman Ayedh dhafer Algarni, Mustafa Mohammed Barnawi
{"title":"新旧飞利浦心导管成像系统比较","authors":"Faleh Alqahtani, Majed Battah Alshammari, Turki Saleh Alduhaim, Najla Awadh Alanazi, Jaber Ali Alshehri, Fatimah Almasoudi, Abdullah M. Alanazi, Ali Al Shahrani, Uttam Kopadre, Nawaf Al Harbi, Yazeed Al Harbi, Waleed Al Moutiri, Mohammed Al Yousef, Ibrahim Al Drim, Abdulrahman Al Harbi, Azzam AlOtaib, Abdulrahman Ayedh dhafer Algarni, Mustafa Mohammed Barnawi","doi":"10.36349/easjrit.2023.v05i06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: X-ray systems in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are essential to helping and treating patients best. However, they come at the cost of harming the patients and health workers through unnecessary high exposure to radiation particles. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and the radiation doses of the recent Philips imaging systems Azurion Hybrid OR and the older Philips systems Allura Xper FD 10 and Allura clarity FD 10 in the cardiac catheterization laboratories. Method: A descriptive, comparative research design was utilized, 480 procedures were assessed retrospectively, and all met predetermined inclusion criteria from January 2014 until May 2023. Dose area product, Air Kerma, and Fluoroscopy time (Fluro time) were compared between the three Philips systems, which are Allura Xper FD10/10 R 7.2 and Allura Clarity FD10 R8.2 (old system) and Hybrid Azurion new Philips system. Result: Allura clarity FD 10 and Azurion Hybrid OR were superior to Allura Xper FD 10 in Dose Area Product and Air Kerma (p<0.5). However, fluro time was statistically non-significant among the systems. Conclusion: The latest X-ray imaging systems significantly manage Dose Area Product and Air Kerma levels during medical procedures. Employing these advanced technologies in a cardiac catheterization lab can yield optimal outcomes while minimizing radiation exposure for patients and healthcare personnel.","PeriodicalId":429686,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Radiology and Imaging Technology","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the Old and New Philips Imaging System in the Cardiac Catheterization\",\"authors\":\"Faleh Alqahtani, Majed Battah Alshammari, Turki Saleh Alduhaim, Najla Awadh Alanazi, Jaber Ali Alshehri, Fatimah Almasoudi, Abdullah M. Alanazi, Ali Al Shahrani, Uttam Kopadre, Nawaf Al Harbi, Yazeed Al Harbi, Waleed Al Moutiri, Mohammed Al Yousef, Ibrahim Al Drim, Abdulrahman Al Harbi, Azzam AlOtaib, Abdulrahman Ayedh dhafer Algarni, Mustafa Mohammed Barnawi\",\"doi\":\"10.36349/easjrit.2023.v05i06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: X-ray systems in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are essential to helping and treating patients best. However, they come at the cost of harming the patients and health workers through unnecessary high exposure to radiation particles. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and the radiation doses of the recent Philips imaging systems Azurion Hybrid OR and the older Philips systems Allura Xper FD 10 and Allura clarity FD 10 in the cardiac catheterization laboratories. Method: A descriptive, comparative research design was utilized, 480 procedures were assessed retrospectively, and all met predetermined inclusion criteria from January 2014 until May 2023. Dose area product, Air Kerma, and Fluoroscopy time (Fluro time) were compared between the three Philips systems, which are Allura Xper FD10/10 R 7.2 and Allura Clarity FD10 R8.2 (old system) and Hybrid Azurion new Philips system. Result: Allura clarity FD 10 and Azurion Hybrid OR were superior to Allura Xper FD 10 in Dose Area Product and Air Kerma (p<0.5). However, fluro time was statistically non-significant among the systems. Conclusion: The latest X-ray imaging systems significantly manage Dose Area Product and Air Kerma levels during medical procedures. Employing these advanced technologies in a cardiac catheterization lab can yield optimal outcomes while minimizing radiation exposure for patients and healthcare personnel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EAS Journal of Radiology and Imaging Technology\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EAS Journal of Radiology and Imaging Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjrit.2023.v05i06.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Radiology and Imaging Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjrit.2023.v05i06.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心导管实验室的 X 射线系统对于帮助和治疗病人至关重要。然而,它们的代价是不必要地暴露在大量辐射粒子中,对病人和医务工作者造成伤害。目的:该研究旨在评估和比较最新的飞利浦成像系统 Azurion Hybrid OR 与较早的飞利浦系统 Allura Xper FD 10 和 Allura clarity FD 10 在心导管室中的有效性和辐射剂量。研究方法:采用描述性比较研究设计,回顾性评估了自 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间的 480 例手术,所有手术均符合预先确定的纳入标准。比较了三种飞利浦系统(Allura Xper FD10/10 R 7.2、Allura Clarity FD10 R8.2(旧系统)和 Hybrid Azurion 新飞利浦系统)的剂量面积乘积、气孔和透视时间(Fluuro time)。结果:Allura clarity FD 10 和 Azurion Hybrid OR 在剂量面积乘积和 Air Kerma 方面优于 Allura Xper FD 10(p<0.5)。然而,各系统的闪光时间在统计学上没有显著差异。结论最新的 X 射线成像系统能明显控制医疗过程中的剂量面积积和空气压马水平。在心导管室中采用这些先进技术可以获得最佳治疗效果,同时最大限度地减少对患者和医护人员的辐射照射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between the Old and New Philips Imaging System in the Cardiac Catheterization
Background: X-ray systems in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are essential to helping and treating patients best. However, they come at the cost of harming the patients and health workers through unnecessary high exposure to radiation particles. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and the radiation doses of the recent Philips imaging systems Azurion Hybrid OR and the older Philips systems Allura Xper FD 10 and Allura clarity FD 10 in the cardiac catheterization laboratories. Method: A descriptive, comparative research design was utilized, 480 procedures were assessed retrospectively, and all met predetermined inclusion criteria from January 2014 until May 2023. Dose area product, Air Kerma, and Fluoroscopy time (Fluro time) were compared between the three Philips systems, which are Allura Xper FD10/10 R 7.2 and Allura Clarity FD10 R8.2 (old system) and Hybrid Azurion new Philips system. Result: Allura clarity FD 10 and Azurion Hybrid OR were superior to Allura Xper FD 10 in Dose Area Product and Air Kerma (p<0.5). However, fluro time was statistically non-significant among the systems. Conclusion: The latest X-ray imaging systems significantly manage Dose Area Product and Air Kerma levels during medical procedures. Employing these advanced technologies in a cardiac catheterization lab can yield optimal outcomes while minimizing radiation exposure for patients and healthcare personnel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信