{"title":"不)披露的伦理:专业、非学术写作语境中的大语言模式","authors":"Erick Piller","doi":"10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the ethics of co-writing with large language models such as GPT-4 in professional, non-academic writing contexts without disclosing the practice to stakeholders. It considers five ethical concepts through an analysis of a hypothetical scenario. Three of the concepts—transparency, data practices, and expanded circulation—originate in the work of Heidi McKee and James Porter. The other two, just price and risk imposition, have particular relevance for professional writers. The article ultimately proposes that these five concepts can serve as points of reference as we attempt to formulate and articulate ethical judgments about co-writing with generative AI in specific, contextually grounded instances.","PeriodicalId":43128,"journal":{"name":"Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethics of (Non)disclosure: Large Language Models in Professional, Nonacademic Writing Contexts\",\"authors\":\"Erick Piller\",\"doi\":\"10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the ethics of co-writing with large language models such as GPT-4 in professional, non-academic writing contexts without disclosing the practice to stakeholders. It considers five ethical concepts through an analysis of a hypothetical scenario. Three of the concepts—transparency, data practices, and expanded circulation—originate in the work of Heidi McKee and James Porter. The other two, just price and risk imposition, have particular relevance for professional writers. The article ultimately proposes that these five concepts can serve as points of reference as we attempt to formulate and articulate ethical judgments about co-writing with generative AI in specific, contextually grounded instances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n4.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Ethics of (Non)disclosure: Large Language Models in Professional, Nonacademic Writing Contexts
This article explores the ethics of co-writing with large language models such as GPT-4 in professional, non-academic writing contexts without disclosing the practice to stakeholders. It considers five ethical concepts through an analysis of a hypothetical scenario. Three of the concepts—transparency, data practices, and expanded circulation—originate in the work of Heidi McKee and James Porter. The other two, just price and risk imposition, have particular relevance for professional writers. The article ultimately proposes that these five concepts can serve as points of reference as we attempt to formulate and articulate ethical judgments about co-writing with generative AI in specific, contextually grounded instances.
期刊介绍:
“The fundamental idea for interdisciplinarity derives” as our Chief Editor Explains, “from an evolutionary necessity; namely the need to confront and interpret complex systems…An entity that is studied can no longer be analyzed in terms of an object of just single discipline, but as a contending hierarchy of components which could be studied under the rubric of multiple or variable branches of knowledge.” Following this, we encourage authors to engage themselves in interdisciplinary discussion of topics from the broad areas listed below and apply interdsiciplinary perspectives from other areas of the humanities and/or the sciences wherever applicable. We publish peer-reviewed original research papers and reviews in the interdisciplinary fields of humanities. A list, which is not exclusive, is given below for convenience. See Areas of discussion. We have firm conviction in Open Access philosophy and strongly support Open Access Initiatives. Rupkatha has signed on to the Budapest Open Access Initiative. In conformity with this, the principles of publications are primarily guided by the open nature of knowledge.