"他人的烦恼团结、社会纽带和可见性

Mary N. Layoun, Joseph Layon
{"title":"\"他人的烦恼团结、社会纽带和可见性","authors":"Mary N. Layoun, Joseph Layon","doi":"10.30958/ajp.10-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can we “share the trouble of others”? Andree Chedid’s novel, The Sixth Day – our point of departure here – poses and suggests a provocative response to this question, to how we might see one another as cohabitants, to how we might engage in a “politics of deep solidarity” (Alexander 2020). More than empathy or compassion, this sharing or solidarity demands we take on our portion of the trouble of others; it makes clear the need for “political friendship” (Allen 2004) or “political solidarity” (Scholz 2008) or “solidarity with strangers” (Dean 1996). And if we can see and hear the demand for sharing the trouble of others, can we imagine putting it into practice (the story Chedid’s novel tells), recognizing that the alternatives are, literally, deadly? In reflecting on our initial question, we arrived at another: what happens to the possibility of solidarity with those whom we do not, or refuse, to see? Drawing on our personal, intellectual, and political experiences, we reflect on these questions, following the lead of material-world clinical cases and of imaginative fiction to point to a radically inclusive sharing that, we argue, our historical moment demands. Keywords: literature, solidarity, social bonds, political friendship, solidarity with strangers","PeriodicalId":199513,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":"288 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Trouble of Others”: Solidarity, Social Bonds, and Visibility\",\"authors\":\"Mary N. Layoun, Joseph Layon\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajp.10-4-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Can we “share the trouble of others”? Andree Chedid’s novel, The Sixth Day – our point of departure here – poses and suggests a provocative response to this question, to how we might see one another as cohabitants, to how we might engage in a “politics of deep solidarity” (Alexander 2020). More than empathy or compassion, this sharing or solidarity demands we take on our portion of the trouble of others; it makes clear the need for “political friendship” (Allen 2004) or “political solidarity” (Scholz 2008) or “solidarity with strangers” (Dean 1996). And if we can see and hear the demand for sharing the trouble of others, can we imagine putting it into practice (the story Chedid’s novel tells), recognizing that the alternatives are, literally, deadly? In reflecting on our initial question, we arrived at another: what happens to the possibility of solidarity with those whom we do not, or refuse, to see? Drawing on our personal, intellectual, and political experiences, we reflect on these questions, following the lead of material-world clinical cases and of imaginative fiction to point to a radically inclusive sharing that, we argue, our historical moment demands. Keywords: literature, solidarity, social bonds, political friendship, solidarity with strangers\",\"PeriodicalId\":199513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"288 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.10-4-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.10-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们能否 "与他人共患难"?Andree Chedid 的小说《第六天》--我们在此的出发点--对这一问题提出并建议了一种挑衅性的回应,即我们如何将彼此视为同居者,如何参与 "深度团结的政治"(Alexander 2020)。与同情或怜悯相比,这种分享或团结要求我们承担起他人的那部分麻烦;它明确了 "政治友谊"(Allen,2004 年)或 "政治团结"(Scholz,2008 年)或 "与陌生人团结"(Dean,1996 年)的必要性。如果我们能够看到和听到与他人共患难的要求,我们能否想象将其付诸实践(切迪德的小说所讲述的故事),并认识到其他选择都是致命的?在反思我们最初的问题时,我们得出了另一个问题:与那些我们没有看到或拒绝看到的人团结一致的可能性会怎样?根据我们的个人、知识和政治经验,我们对这些问题进行了反思,并以物质世界的临床案例和想象小说为线索,指出了一种根本性的包容性分享,我们认为,这是我们的历史时刻所要求的。关键词:文学、团结、社会纽带、政治友谊、与陌生人的团结
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“The Trouble of Others”: Solidarity, Social Bonds, and Visibility
Can we “share the trouble of others”? Andree Chedid’s novel, The Sixth Day – our point of departure here – poses and suggests a provocative response to this question, to how we might see one another as cohabitants, to how we might engage in a “politics of deep solidarity” (Alexander 2020). More than empathy or compassion, this sharing or solidarity demands we take on our portion of the trouble of others; it makes clear the need for “political friendship” (Allen 2004) or “political solidarity” (Scholz 2008) or “solidarity with strangers” (Dean 1996). And if we can see and hear the demand for sharing the trouble of others, can we imagine putting it into practice (the story Chedid’s novel tells), recognizing that the alternatives are, literally, deadly? In reflecting on our initial question, we arrived at another: what happens to the possibility of solidarity with those whom we do not, or refuse, to see? Drawing on our personal, intellectual, and political experiences, we reflect on these questions, following the lead of material-world clinical cases and of imaginative fiction to point to a radically inclusive sharing that, we argue, our historical moment demands. Keywords: literature, solidarity, social bonds, political friendship, solidarity with strangers
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信