pati regency地区家长接受儿童接种covid-19疫苗意愿的差异

Margaretha Inadyas Verganza, A. Sriatmi, Nurhasmadiar Nandini
{"title":"pati regency地区家长接受儿童接种covid-19疫苗意愿的差异","authors":"Margaretha Inadyas Verganza, A. Sriatmi, Nurhasmadiar Nandini","doi":"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.212-220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coverage of COVID-19 vaccination for children in Pati Regency was still low at 37% in February 2022 compared to the 75% target. Some preliminary studies in Kudus showed that parents who received socialization about children’s COVID-19 vaccination experienced concerns affecting their responses negatively to the program. Aims: This study aims to analyze differences in parental acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination for children in Pati Regency. Methods: This study was quantitative research with a cross-sectional approach. The variables consisted of 7Cs components (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, Collective Responsibility, Compliance, Conspiracy) and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. The total sample of respondents was 372 parents divided into two independent groups obtained by cluster and proportional sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire via Google Forms and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results showed differences in parental acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination (sig = 0.006) regarding constraints (sig = 0.000), collective responsibility (sig = 0.012), compliance (sig = 0.012), confidence (sig = 0.019), complacency (sig = 0.020), calculation (sig = 0.027), and conspiracy (sig = 0.037). Conclusion: Some differences were found between parents whose children received the vaccine and those whose children did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Parents whose children received the COVID-19 vaccine were likely to have a good perception of the COVID-19 vaccination. Meanwhile, parents whose children did not get vaccinated would likely have a bad perception. Educational and consulting services possibly increase vaccination coverage. Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination for children; different acceptance; 7Cs components","PeriodicalId":32968,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIFFERENCES IN PARENTS’ READINESS TO ACCEPT CHILDREN’S COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PATI REGENCY\",\"authors\":\"Margaretha Inadyas Verganza, A. Sriatmi, Nurhasmadiar Nandini\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.212-220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The coverage of COVID-19 vaccination for children in Pati Regency was still low at 37% in February 2022 compared to the 75% target. Some preliminary studies in Kudus showed that parents who received socialization about children’s COVID-19 vaccination experienced concerns affecting their responses negatively to the program. Aims: This study aims to analyze differences in parental acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination for children in Pati Regency. Methods: This study was quantitative research with a cross-sectional approach. The variables consisted of 7Cs components (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, Collective Responsibility, Compliance, Conspiracy) and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. The total sample of respondents was 372 parents divided into two independent groups obtained by cluster and proportional sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire via Google Forms and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results showed differences in parental acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination (sig = 0.006) regarding constraints (sig = 0.000), collective responsibility (sig = 0.012), compliance (sig = 0.012), confidence (sig = 0.019), complacency (sig = 0.020), calculation (sig = 0.027), and conspiracy (sig = 0.037). Conclusion: Some differences were found between parents whose children received the vaccine and those whose children did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Parents whose children received the COVID-19 vaccine were likely to have a good perception of the COVID-19 vaccination. Meanwhile, parents whose children did not get vaccinated would likely have a bad perception. Educational and consulting services possibly increase vaccination coverage. Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination for children; different acceptance; 7Cs components\",\"PeriodicalId\":32968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.212-220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v11i2.2023.212-220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2022 年 2 月,帕蒂地区的儿童 COVID-19 疫苗接种覆盖率仍较低,仅为 37%,而目标接种率为 75%。在库都斯(Kudus)进行的一些初步研究表明,接受过儿童 COVID-19 疫苗接种社会化教育的家长会有一些顾虑,从而对该计划产生负面影响。目的:本研究旨在分析帕蒂地区家长对儿童接种 COVID-19 疫苗接受程度的差异。研究方法本研究为横断面定量研究。变量包括 7Cs 要素(信心、自满、约束、计算、集体责任、服从、阴谋)和对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的接受程度。受访者总样本数为 372 名家长,通过聚类和比例抽样分为两个独立小组。数据通过谷歌表格问卷收集,并使用曼-惠特尼检验进行分析。结果显示结果显示,家长对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的接受度(sig = 0.006)在限制因素(sig = 0.000)、集体责任(sig = 0.012)、遵从(sig = 0.012)、信心(sig = 0.019)、自满(sig = 0.020)、计算(sig = 0.027)和阴谋(sig = 0.037)方面存在差异。结论子女接种了 COVID-19 疫苗的家长与子女未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的家长之间存在一些差异。子女接种了 COVID-19 疫苗的家长可能对 COVID-19 疫苗接种有良好的认知。与此同时,子女未接种疫苗的家长可能会有不好的看法。教育和咨询服务可能会提高疫苗接种覆盖率。关键词为儿童接种 COVID-19 疫苗;不同的接受度;7Cs 要素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DIFFERENCES IN PARENTS’ READINESS TO ACCEPT CHILDREN’S COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PATI REGENCY
Background: The coverage of COVID-19 vaccination for children in Pati Regency was still low at 37% in February 2022 compared to the 75% target. Some preliminary studies in Kudus showed that parents who received socialization about children’s COVID-19 vaccination experienced concerns affecting their responses negatively to the program. Aims: This study aims to analyze differences in parental acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccination for children in Pati Regency. Methods: This study was quantitative research with a cross-sectional approach. The variables consisted of 7Cs components (Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation, Collective Responsibility, Compliance, Conspiracy) and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination. The total sample of respondents was 372 parents divided into two independent groups obtained by cluster and proportional sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire via Google Forms and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: The results showed differences in parental acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination (sig = 0.006) regarding constraints (sig = 0.000), collective responsibility (sig = 0.012), compliance (sig = 0.012), confidence (sig = 0.019), complacency (sig = 0.020), calculation (sig = 0.027), and conspiracy (sig = 0.037). Conclusion: Some differences were found between parents whose children received the vaccine and those whose children did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Parents whose children received the COVID-19 vaccine were likely to have a good perception of the COVID-19 vaccination. Meanwhile, parents whose children did not get vaccinated would likely have a bad perception. Educational and consulting services possibly increase vaccination coverage. Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination for children; different acceptance; 7Cs components
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信