南非共同目的论的起源

Q3 Social Sciences

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a16385

Shannon Hoctor

{"title":"南非共同目的论的起源","authors":"Shannon Hoctor","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a16385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution seeks to assess whether the generally accepted narrative of the emergence of the common purpose doctrine in South African law, as set out in Rabie's analysis of the doctrine, is indeed correct. In particular the following questions are examined: (i) Did the common purpose doctrine derive from English roots? (ii) Were the means of entry into South African law the Native Territories Penal Code? (iii) Did the doctrine indeed emerge in South African case law in 1917, in the Appellate Division case of McKenzie v Van der Merwe?","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"107 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Genesis of the Common Purpose Doctrine in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Hoctor\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a16385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution seeks to assess whether the generally accepted narrative of the emergence of the common purpose doctrine in South African law, as set out in Rabie's analysis of the doctrine, is indeed correct. In particular the following questions are examined: (i) Did the common purpose doctrine derive from English roots? (ii) Were the means of entry into South African law the Native Territories Penal Code? (iii) Did the doctrine indeed emerge in South African case law in 1917, in the Appellate Division case of McKenzie v Van der Merwe?\",\"PeriodicalId\":55857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a16385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a16385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图评估拉比对南非法律中共同目的学说的分析中所阐述的关于该学说出现的普遍接受的说法是否确实正确。本文特别探讨了以下问题：(i) 共同目的学说是否源于英国？ (ii) 进入南非法律的途径是《本土刑法典》吗？(iii) 在 1917 年上诉庭 McKenzie 诉 Van der Merwe 案中，南非判例法中是否确实出现了这一理论？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Genesis of the Common Purpose Doctrine in South Africa

This contribution seeks to assess whether the generally accepted narrative of the emergence of the common purpose doctrine in South African law, as set out in Rabie's analysis of the doctrine, is indeed correct. In particular the following questions are examined: (i) Did the common purpose doctrine derive from English roots? (ii) Were the means of entry into South African law the Native Territories Penal Code? (iii) Did the doctrine indeed emerge in South African case law in 1917, in the Appellate Division case of McKenzie v Van der Merwe?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.