南非在应对所有权转让和零散财产计划管理方面的挑战方面的经验对尼日利亚的启示

Q3 Social Sciences
K. Omidire
{"title":"南非在应对所有权转让和零散财产计划管理方面的挑战方面的经验对尼日利亚的启示","authors":"K. Omidire","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A \"fragmented property\" or \"multiple unit\" property is one in which several persons have ownership or title interest in sections or parts of a single property scheme. The title interest could be in a block of flats/apartments or maisonettes in a building, and a building in a group of buildings, or townhouse(s), and fully detached houses in a complex or estate. Without clear rules regulating the nature and scope of title, the use of individual units in the scheme, and the conduct and inter-personal relations of the parties involved, incessant litigation or self-help remediation is likely to be common. In Nigeria the first fragmented property scheme was established by the government in 1959 to provide accommodation for senior  public servants. Several others have followed, and the establishment of housing estates is no longer restricted to the government. However, the intractable problem with schemes in Nigeria is that there is a lack of a specific legal framework to address the provision of an unimpeachable title to buyers, and for the administration of schemes for the benefit of all parties. There is therefore a need to address the problems associated with the transfer of title and the administration of fragmented property schemes. Doing so is the objective of this article. To achieve that objective, the legal framework applicable to fragmented property schemes in South Africa is critically considered with a view to learn from the experience of the country's robust legislation developed by caselaw, in addition to academic opinions over a period exceeding half a century. Recommendations to deal with the challenges in Nigeria regarding the issues of transfer of title and management of fragmented property schemes are proposed.","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"32 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons for Nigeria from the Experience of South Africa in Managing the Challenges of Transfer of Title and Administration of Fragmented Property Schemes\",\"authors\":\"K. Omidire\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A \\\"fragmented property\\\" or \\\"multiple unit\\\" property is one in which several persons have ownership or title interest in sections or parts of a single property scheme. The title interest could be in a block of flats/apartments or maisonettes in a building, and a building in a group of buildings, or townhouse(s), and fully detached houses in a complex or estate. Without clear rules regulating the nature and scope of title, the use of individual units in the scheme, and the conduct and inter-personal relations of the parties involved, incessant litigation or self-help remediation is likely to be common. In Nigeria the first fragmented property scheme was established by the government in 1959 to provide accommodation for senior  public servants. Several others have followed, and the establishment of housing estates is no longer restricted to the government. However, the intractable problem with schemes in Nigeria is that there is a lack of a specific legal framework to address the provision of an unimpeachable title to buyers, and for the administration of schemes for the benefit of all parties. There is therefore a need to address the problems associated with the transfer of title and the administration of fragmented property schemes. Doing so is the objective of this article. To achieve that objective, the legal framework applicable to fragmented property schemes in South Africa is critically considered with a view to learn from the experience of the country's robust legislation developed by caselaw, in addition to academic opinions over a period exceeding half a century. Recommendations to deal with the challenges in Nigeria regarding the issues of transfer of title and management of fragmented property schemes are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

零散房产 "或 "多单元 "房产是指几个人对单一房产计划的部分或多个部分拥有所有权或产权权益的房产。产权权益可以是一栋楼中的一幢公寓/单元房或联排别墅,也可以是一组楼中的一幢楼,还可以是联排别墅,以及综合体或房地产中的全独立式住宅。如果没有明确的规则来规范产权的性质和范围、计划中各个单位的用途以及相关各方的行为和人际关系,那么无休止的诉讼或自助式补救措施很可能会屡见不鲜。在尼日利亚,政府于 1959 年制定了第一个零散财产计划,为高级公务员提供住所。随后又有其他几项计划相继出台,住宅区的建立也不再局限于政府。然而,尼日利亚的计划存在一个难以解决的问题,那就是缺乏一个具体的法律框架来解决为购房者提供无可挑剔的产权问题,以及为各方利益对计划进行管理的问题。因此,有必要解决与产权转让和分散的房地产计划管理相关的问题。本文的目标就是解决这些问题。为了实现这一目标,本文对适用于南非零散财产计划的法律框架进行了批判性审议,以期从南非半个多世纪以来通过判例法和学术意见制定的健全立法中汲取经验。提出了应对尼日利亚在零散财产计划的产权转让和管理问题上的挑战的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons for Nigeria from the Experience of South Africa in Managing the Challenges of Transfer of Title and Administration of Fragmented Property Schemes
A "fragmented property" or "multiple unit" property is one in which several persons have ownership or title interest in sections or parts of a single property scheme. The title interest could be in a block of flats/apartments or maisonettes in a building, and a building in a group of buildings, or townhouse(s), and fully detached houses in a complex or estate. Without clear rules regulating the nature and scope of title, the use of individual units in the scheme, and the conduct and inter-personal relations of the parties involved, incessant litigation or self-help remediation is likely to be common. In Nigeria the first fragmented property scheme was established by the government in 1959 to provide accommodation for senior  public servants. Several others have followed, and the establishment of housing estates is no longer restricted to the government. However, the intractable problem with schemes in Nigeria is that there is a lack of a specific legal framework to address the provision of an unimpeachable title to buyers, and for the administration of schemes for the benefit of all parties. There is therefore a need to address the problems associated with the transfer of title and the administration of fragmented property schemes. Doing so is the objective of this article. To achieve that objective, the legal framework applicable to fragmented property schemes in South Africa is critically considered with a view to learn from the experience of the country's robust legislation developed by caselaw, in addition to academic opinions over a period exceeding half a century. Recommendations to deal with the challenges in Nigeria regarding the issues of transfer of title and management of fragmented property schemes are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信