改进 PeduliLindungi 评论的情感分析:与 CNN-Word2Vec 和综合否定处理的比较研究

H. Jayadianti, Berliana Andra Arianti, Nurheri Cahyana, S. Saifullah, Rafał Dreżewski
{"title":"改进 PeduliLindungi 评论的情感分析:与 CNN-Word2Vec 和综合否定处理的比较研究","authors":"H. Jayadianti, Berliana Andra Arianti, Nurheri Cahyana, S. Saifullah, Rafał Dreżewski","doi":"10.31763/sitech.v4i2.1184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates sentiment analysis in Google Play reviews of the PeduliLindungi application, focusing on the integration of negation handling into text preprocessing and comparing the effectiveness of two prominent methods: CNN-Word2Vec CBOW and CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram. Through a meticulous methodology, negation handling is incorporated into the preprocessing phase to enhance sentiment analysis. The results demonstrate a noteworthy improvement in accuracy for both methods with the inclusion of negation handling, with CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram emerging as the superior performer, achieving an impressive 76.2% accuracy rate. Leveraging a dataset comprising 13,567 comments, this research introduces a novel approach by emphasizing the significance of negation handling in sentiment analysis. The study not only contributes valuable insights into the optimization of sentiment analysis processes but also provides practical considerations for refining methodologies, particularly in the context of mobile application reviews.","PeriodicalId":123344,"journal":{"name":"Science in Information Technology Letters","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving sentiment analysis on PeduliLindungi comments: a comparative study with CNN-Word2Vec and integrated negation handling\",\"authors\":\"H. Jayadianti, Berliana Andra Arianti, Nurheri Cahyana, S. Saifullah, Rafał Dreżewski\",\"doi\":\"10.31763/sitech.v4i2.1184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates sentiment analysis in Google Play reviews of the PeduliLindungi application, focusing on the integration of negation handling into text preprocessing and comparing the effectiveness of two prominent methods: CNN-Word2Vec CBOW and CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram. Through a meticulous methodology, negation handling is incorporated into the preprocessing phase to enhance sentiment analysis. The results demonstrate a noteworthy improvement in accuracy for both methods with the inclusion of negation handling, with CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram emerging as the superior performer, achieving an impressive 76.2% accuracy rate. Leveraging a dataset comprising 13,567 comments, this research introduces a novel approach by emphasizing the significance of negation handling in sentiment analysis. The study not only contributes valuable insights into the optimization of sentiment analysis processes but also provides practical considerations for refining methodologies, particularly in the context of mobile application reviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science in Information Technology Letters\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science in Information Technology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31763/sitech.v4i2.1184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in Information Technology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31763/sitech.v4i2.1184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了 Google Play 上 PeduliLindungi 应用程序评论中的情感分析,重点是将否定处理整合到文本预处理中,并比较两种著名方法的效果:CNN-Word2Vec CBOW 和 CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram。通过缜密的方法,否定处理被纳入预处理阶段,以增强情感分析。结果表明,加入否定处理后,两种方法的准确率都有显著提高,其中 CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram 的表现更为出色,准确率达到了令人印象深刻的 76.2%。本研究利用由 13,567 条评论组成的数据集,通过强调情感分析中否定处理的重要性,引入了一种新方法。这项研究不仅为情感分析流程的优化提供了有价值的见解,还为改进方法提供了实用的考虑因素,尤其是在移动应用评论方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving sentiment analysis on PeduliLindungi comments: a comparative study with CNN-Word2Vec and integrated negation handling
This study investigates sentiment analysis in Google Play reviews of the PeduliLindungi application, focusing on the integration of negation handling into text preprocessing and comparing the effectiveness of two prominent methods: CNN-Word2Vec CBOW and CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram. Through a meticulous methodology, negation handling is incorporated into the preprocessing phase to enhance sentiment analysis. The results demonstrate a noteworthy improvement in accuracy for both methods with the inclusion of negation handling, with CNN-Word2Vec SkipGram emerging as the superior performer, achieving an impressive 76.2% accuracy rate. Leveraging a dataset comprising 13,567 comments, this research introduces a novel approach by emphasizing the significance of negation handling in sentiment analysis. The study not only contributes valuable insights into the optimization of sentiment analysis processes but also provides practical considerations for refining methodologies, particularly in the context of mobile application reviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信