尼日利亚和印度选举合法性的特点与挑战

Racheal M. Okegbola
{"title":"尼日利亚和印度选举合法性的特点与挑战","authors":"Racheal M. Okegbola","doi":"10.29322/ijsrp.13.11.2023.p14342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- This study examines the complex dynamics of electoral legitimacy and its effect on gender equality in the electoral systems of Nigeria and India from 2004 to 2015. It emphasises the significant barrier that gender inequality in politics poses, the challenges that female candidates face within political parties, and the implications for the legitimacy of elections in these two democratic systems. In addition, it investigates the barriers to achieving gender representation in the context of electoral legitimacy. A comparative analysis is conducted to determine the similarities and differences between the electoral legitimacy of the two countries. Utilising a secondary qualitative research methodology, the current study relies on various secondary sources, such as peer-reviewed academic papers and official government reports meticulously compiled from credible academic databases. The study's findings indicate that India's emphasis on electoral autonomy and technological progress has increased public confidence. In contrast, Nigeria needs help to maintain the independence and openness of its electoral commission. The study suggests a series of measures that should be prioritised to strengthen the legitimacy of electoral procedures.","PeriodicalId":14431,"journal":{"name":"International journal of scientific and research publications","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Characteristics and Challenges of Electoral Legitimacy in Nigeria and India\",\"authors\":\"Racheal M. Okegbola\",\"doi\":\"10.29322/ijsrp.13.11.2023.p14342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"- This study examines the complex dynamics of electoral legitimacy and its effect on gender equality in the electoral systems of Nigeria and India from 2004 to 2015. It emphasises the significant barrier that gender inequality in politics poses, the challenges that female candidates face within political parties, and the implications for the legitimacy of elections in these two democratic systems. In addition, it investigates the barriers to achieving gender representation in the context of electoral legitimacy. A comparative analysis is conducted to determine the similarities and differences between the electoral legitimacy of the two countries. Utilising a secondary qualitative research methodology, the current study relies on various secondary sources, such as peer-reviewed academic papers and official government reports meticulously compiled from credible academic databases. The study's findings indicate that India's emphasis on electoral autonomy and technological progress has increased public confidence. In contrast, Nigeria needs help to maintain the independence and openness of its electoral commission. The study suggests a series of measures that should be prioritised to strengthen the legitimacy of electoral procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of scientific and research publications\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of scientific and research publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.11.2023.p14342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of scientific and research publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.11.2023.p14342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

- 本研究探讨了 2004 年至 2015 年尼日利亚和印度选举制度中选举合法性的复杂动态及其对性别平等的影响。研究强调了政治中的性别不平等所造成的重大障碍、女性候选人在政党中面临的挑战以及对这两种民主制度中选举合法性的影响。此外,它还调查了在选举合法性背景下实现性别代表性的障碍。通过比较分析,确定两国选举合法性的异同。本研究采用二级定性研究方法,依靠各种二级资料来源,如同行评审的学术论文和从可靠的学术数据库中精心汇编的官方政府报告。研究结果表明,印度对选举自治和技术进步的重视增强了公众的信心。相比之下,尼日利亚需要帮助来保持其选举委员会的独立性和开放性。研究提出了一系列应优先采取的措施,以加强选举程序的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Characteristics and Challenges of Electoral Legitimacy in Nigeria and India
- This study examines the complex dynamics of electoral legitimacy and its effect on gender equality in the electoral systems of Nigeria and India from 2004 to 2015. It emphasises the significant barrier that gender inequality in politics poses, the challenges that female candidates face within political parties, and the implications for the legitimacy of elections in these two democratic systems. In addition, it investigates the barriers to achieving gender representation in the context of electoral legitimacy. A comparative analysis is conducted to determine the similarities and differences between the electoral legitimacy of the two countries. Utilising a secondary qualitative research methodology, the current study relies on various secondary sources, such as peer-reviewed academic papers and official government reports meticulously compiled from credible academic databases. The study's findings indicate that India's emphasis on electoral autonomy and technological progress has increased public confidence. In contrast, Nigeria needs help to maintain the independence and openness of its electoral commission. The study suggests a series of measures that should be prioritised to strengthen the legitimacy of electoral procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信