将 "学会争论 "和 "争论学会指导 "结合起来:提高 EFL 学习者的英语语言水平和论证写作能力

Khin Mayoo, Hiroyuki Eto
{"title":"将 \"学会争论 \"和 \"争论学会指导 \"结合起来:提高 EFL 学习者的英语语言水平和论证写作能力","authors":"Khin Mayoo, Hiroyuki Eto","doi":"10.54850/jrspelt.7.40.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Argumentative writing has increasingly gained attention in EFL writing, though EFL learners generally have deficiencies in this writing. English language proficiency is one of the main factors that can undermine EFL argumentative writing quality. Integrating learning to argue and arguing to learn instructions along with classroom debates were employed in EFL argumentative writing classes for the 11-week online course. This study aimed to investigate the intervention's effect on the argumentative writing performance and English language competence of Myanmar EFL learners. Twenty-six Myanmar undergraduate students voluntarily engaged in the experiment. The Versant English Placement Test and argumentative writing were administered as pre-and post-tests of this study. The results showed that the integrated instruction could enhance both English language competence and argumentative writing performance of the EFL learners and significant correlations between the gains of certain argumentative elements and English language development. These findings contribute to the implementation of integrated instructions in the EFL context.","PeriodicalId":221233,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching","volume":"221 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn Instructions: Enhancing English Language Proficiency and Argumentative Writing of EFL Learners\",\"authors\":\"Khin Mayoo, Hiroyuki Eto\",\"doi\":\"10.54850/jrspelt.7.40.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Argumentative writing has increasingly gained attention in EFL writing, though EFL learners generally have deficiencies in this writing. English language proficiency is one of the main factors that can undermine EFL argumentative writing quality. Integrating learning to argue and arguing to learn instructions along with classroom debates were employed in EFL argumentative writing classes for the 11-week online course. This study aimed to investigate the intervention's effect on the argumentative writing performance and English language competence of Myanmar EFL learners. Twenty-six Myanmar undergraduate students voluntarily engaged in the experiment. The Versant English Placement Test and argumentative writing were administered as pre-and post-tests of this study. The results showed that the integrated instruction could enhance both English language competence and argumentative writing performance of the EFL learners and significant correlations between the gains of certain argumentative elements and English language development. These findings contribute to the implementation of integrated instructions in the EFL context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.7.40.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.7.40.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:论证性写作在 EFL 写作中越来越受到重视,尽管 EFL 学习者在这种写作中普遍存在不足。英语水平是影响 EFL 议论文写作质量的主要因素之一。在为期11周的在线课程中,EFL议论文写作课采用了 "学会议论 "和 "议论学会 "的教学方法,并进行了课堂辩论。本研究旨在探讨该干预措施对缅甸 EFL 学习者的议论文写作成绩和英语语言能力的影响。26 名缅甸本科生自愿参与了实验。Versant英语分级测试和议论文写作作为本研究的前测和后测。结果表明,综合教学能同时提高 EFL 学习者的英语语言能力和议论文写作成绩,且某些议论要素的提高与英语语言发展之间存在显著相关性。这些研究结果有助于在 EFL 环境中实施综合教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Learning to Argue and Arguing to Learn Instructions: Enhancing English Language Proficiency and Argumentative Writing of EFL Learners
: Argumentative writing has increasingly gained attention in EFL writing, though EFL learners generally have deficiencies in this writing. English language proficiency is one of the main factors that can undermine EFL argumentative writing quality. Integrating learning to argue and arguing to learn instructions along with classroom debates were employed in EFL argumentative writing classes for the 11-week online course. This study aimed to investigate the intervention's effect on the argumentative writing performance and English language competence of Myanmar EFL learners. Twenty-six Myanmar undergraduate students voluntarily engaged in the experiment. The Versant English Placement Test and argumentative writing were administered as pre-and post-tests of this study. The results showed that the integrated instruction could enhance both English language competence and argumentative writing performance of the EFL learners and significant correlations between the gains of certain argumentative elements and English language development. These findings contribute to the implementation of integrated instructions in the EFL context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信