{"title":"台湾通奸非刑罪化","authors":"David KC Huang, Nigel N.T. Li","doi":"10.1163/15718158-24030002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Taiwan’s decriminalisation of adultery in the landmark decision of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 791 [2020]. The Justices affirmed the right to freedom of sexual behaviour, ruling that imposing a criminal limit on the right in the name of marriage protection or the public interest is a disproportionate means to protect marriage, because the law cannot protect marriage. Moreover, a proviso of the law of adultery was held to be incompatible with the principle of equality, as it allowed the faithful spouse to sue only the person who fornicated with the unfaithful spouse, which was a vestige of moral vengeance rooted in the Chinese culture of nulla poena sine ‘Li’ (Chu-Li-Ru-Xing).","PeriodicalId":35216,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decriminalisation of Adultery in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"David KC Huang, Nigel N.T. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718158-24030002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines Taiwan’s decriminalisation of adultery in the landmark decision of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 791 [2020]. The Justices affirmed the right to freedom of sexual behaviour, ruling that imposing a criminal limit on the right in the name of marriage protection or the public interest is a disproportionate means to protect marriage, because the law cannot protect marriage. Moreover, a proviso of the law of adultery was held to be incompatible with the principle of equality, as it allowed the faithful spouse to sue only the person who fornicated with the unfaithful spouse, which was a vestige of moral vengeance rooted in the Chinese culture of nulla poena sine ‘Li’ (Chu-Li-Ru-Xing).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24030002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24030002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article examines Taiwan’s decriminalisation of adultery in the landmark decision of Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 791 [2020]. The Justices affirmed the right to freedom of sexual behaviour, ruling that imposing a criminal limit on the right in the name of marriage protection or the public interest is a disproportionate means to protect marriage, because the law cannot protect marriage. Moreover, a proviso of the law of adultery was held to be incompatible with the principle of equality, as it allowed the faithful spouse to sue only the person who fornicated with the unfaithful spouse, which was a vestige of moral vengeance rooted in the Chinese culture of nulla poena sine ‘Li’ (Chu-Li-Ru-Xing).
期刊介绍:
The Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is the world’s only law journal offering scholars a forum in which to present comparative, international and national research dealing specifically with issues of law and human rights in the Asia-Pacific region. Neither a lobby group nor tied to any particular ideology, the Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law is a scientific journal dedicated to responding to the need for a periodical publication dealing with the legal challenges of human rights issues in one of the world’s most diverse and dynamic regions.