{"title":"对 Sara Smith 等人所著 \"The Work of Repair:对萨拉-史密斯等人所著 \"土地、关系和教育学 \"的回应","authors":"J. Lewis","doi":"10.1177/14744740231210688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This response to ‘The Work of Repair: Land, Relation, and Pedagogy’ engages with the authors’ cases of Black Mesa, Port Arthur, Dzongu, and the University to further advance how the working of repair among geographers must be undertaken with greater assertiveness if the discipline of geography will be able to produce a reparative effect in its scholarship. Ultimately, the response asks what is repair, a question that this paper encourages geographers to boldly ask and answer.","PeriodicalId":505675,"journal":{"name":"cultural geographies","volume":"234 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to ‘The Work of Repair: Land, Relation, and Pedagogy’ by Sara Smith et al.\",\"authors\":\"J. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14744740231210688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This response to ‘The Work of Repair: Land, Relation, and Pedagogy’ engages with the authors’ cases of Black Mesa, Port Arthur, Dzongu, and the University to further advance how the working of repair among geographers must be undertaken with greater assertiveness if the discipline of geography will be able to produce a reparative effect in its scholarship. Ultimately, the response asks what is repair, a question that this paper encourages geographers to boldly ask and answer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"cultural geographies\",\"volume\":\"234 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"cultural geographies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740231210688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"cultural geographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740231210688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Response to ‘The Work of Repair: Land, Relation, and Pedagogy’ by Sara Smith et al.
This response to ‘The Work of Repair: Land, Relation, and Pedagogy’ engages with the authors’ cases of Black Mesa, Port Arthur, Dzongu, and the University to further advance how the working of repair among geographers must be undertaken with greater assertiveness if the discipline of geography will be able to produce a reparative effect in its scholarship. Ultimately, the response asks what is repair, a question that this paper encourages geographers to boldly ask and answer.