评估伊朗 COVID-19 康复者中 COVID 后认知障碍的患病率和预测因素:贝叶斯分析

IF 0.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
F. Ghadirian, A. Shafighi
{"title":"评估伊朗 COVID-19 康复者中 COVID 后认知障碍的患病率和预测因素:贝叶斯分析","authors":"F. Ghadirian, A. Shafighi","doi":"10.5812/ans-140290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as a global crisis, has impacted all aspects of human life, even long after its universal containment. Among these impacts, COVID-related cognitive disorders (CDs) are significant, particularly when they persist over the long term. Cognitive disorders are characterized by the brain’s inability to process, store, and utilize information for reasoning, judgment, perception, attention, comprehension, and memory. Objectives: Given the persistence of COVID-related CDs even long after recovery, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictive factors of CDs among individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 in Iran, using Bayesian analysis. Methods: In this regional cross-sectional analytical study, 300 individuals were randomly selected from three hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The subjects were evaluated using the Clinical Demographic Information Questionnaire, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) to determine the prevalence of CDs, identify predictive factors, and examine the interrelationship between CDs and other COVID-related disorders. Results: Among the 300 participants, only 81 individuals (27%) exhibited CDs. The majority of the aforementioned subjects were patients at hospital A (46.91%), and their recovery occurred between 12-18 months ago (39.51%). Among these variables, only the difference in the hospital variable was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Furthermore, there were correlations between CDs and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, and stress, although they were not statistically significant. Ultimately, PTSD (BF = 0.58, P = 0.02), older age (BF = 0.0001, P = 0.0001), hospitalization at hospital A (BF = 0.35, P = 0.001), lower arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) (BF = 0.01, P = 0.0001), and longer hospitalization (BF = 0.001, P = 0.0001) were identified as the most robust predictors for the presence of CDs among individuals recovering from COVID-19. Conclusions: In conclusion, CDs were observed in less than half (27%) of individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. Sociodemographic and health disparities contributed to variations in the prevalence, severity, and significance of these disorders.","PeriodicalId":43970,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Neuroscience","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Post-COVID Cognitive Disorders Among Iranian COVID-19 Recuperated Individuals: A Bayesian Analysis\",\"authors\":\"F. Ghadirian, A. Shafighi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ans-140290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as a global crisis, has impacted all aspects of human life, even long after its universal containment. Among these impacts, COVID-related cognitive disorders (CDs) are significant, particularly when they persist over the long term. Cognitive disorders are characterized by the brain’s inability to process, store, and utilize information for reasoning, judgment, perception, attention, comprehension, and memory. Objectives: Given the persistence of COVID-related CDs even long after recovery, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictive factors of CDs among individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 in Iran, using Bayesian analysis. Methods: In this regional cross-sectional analytical study, 300 individuals were randomly selected from three hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The subjects were evaluated using the Clinical Demographic Information Questionnaire, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) to determine the prevalence of CDs, identify predictive factors, and examine the interrelationship between CDs and other COVID-related disorders. Results: Among the 300 participants, only 81 individuals (27%) exhibited CDs. The majority of the aforementioned subjects were patients at hospital A (46.91%), and their recovery occurred between 12-18 months ago (39.51%). Among these variables, only the difference in the hospital variable was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Furthermore, there were correlations between CDs and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, and stress, although they were not statistically significant. Ultimately, PTSD (BF = 0.58, P = 0.02), older age (BF = 0.0001, P = 0.0001), hospitalization at hospital A (BF = 0.35, P = 0.001), lower arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) (BF = 0.01, P = 0.0001), and longer hospitalization (BF = 0.001, P = 0.0001) were identified as the most robust predictors for the presence of CDs among individuals recovering from COVID-19. Conclusions: In conclusion, CDs were observed in less than half (27%) of individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. Sociodemographic and health disparities contributed to variations in the prevalence, severity, and significance of these disorders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-140290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-140290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)作为一场全球性危机,已经影响到人类生活的方方面面,即使在其被普遍遏制很久之后也是如此。在这些影响中,与 COVID 相关的认知障碍(CDs)非常严重,尤其是当它们长期存在时。认知障碍的特征是大脑无法处理、存储和利用信息进行推理、判断、感知、注意、理解和记忆。目标:鉴于 COVID 相关 CD 即使在康复后很长时间仍会持续存在,本研究旨在使用贝叶斯分析法确定 CD 在伊朗 COVID-19 康复者中的流行率和预测因素。研究方法在这项地区横断面分析研究中,从伊朗德黑兰的三家医院中随机抽取了 300 人。研究人员使用临床人口信息问卷、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、强迫症清单修订版(OCI-R)、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表 21(DASS-21)以及创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)核对表 DSM-5(PCL-5)对受试者进行了评估。我们使用 SPSS 软件(26 版)对所获得的数据进行了分析,以确定 CD 的患病率、确定预测因素并研究 CD 与其他 COVID 相关疾病之间的相互关系。研究结果在 300 名参与者中,只有 81 人(27%)表现出 CD。上述受试者大多是 A 医院的患者(46.91%),他们的康复时间在 12-18 个月前(39.51%)。在这些变量中,只有医院变量的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。此外,CD 与强迫症(OCD)、焦虑和压力之间也存在相关性,但在统计学上并不显著。最终,创伤后应激障碍(BF = 0.58,P = 0.02)、年龄较大(BF = 0.0001,P = 0.0001)、在 A 医院住院(BF = 0.35,P = 0.001)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)较低(BF = 0.01,P = 0.0001)和住院时间较长(BF = 0.001,P = 0.0001)被确定为 COVID-19 康复者出现 CD 的最可靠预测因素。结论总之,不到一半(27%)的 COVID-19 康复者出现了 CD。社会人口和健康差异导致了这些疾病的患病率、严重程度和重要性的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Post-COVID Cognitive Disorders Among Iranian COVID-19 Recuperated Individuals: A Bayesian Analysis
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as a global crisis, has impacted all aspects of human life, even long after its universal containment. Among these impacts, COVID-related cognitive disorders (CDs) are significant, particularly when they persist over the long term. Cognitive disorders are characterized by the brain’s inability to process, store, and utilize information for reasoning, judgment, perception, attention, comprehension, and memory. Objectives: Given the persistence of COVID-related CDs even long after recovery, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictive factors of CDs among individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 in Iran, using Bayesian analysis. Methods: In this regional cross-sectional analytical study, 300 individuals were randomly selected from three hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The subjects were evaluated using the Clinical Demographic Information Questionnaire, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) to determine the prevalence of CDs, identify predictive factors, and examine the interrelationship between CDs and other COVID-related disorders. Results: Among the 300 participants, only 81 individuals (27%) exhibited CDs. The majority of the aforementioned subjects were patients at hospital A (46.91%), and their recovery occurred between 12-18 months ago (39.51%). Among these variables, only the difference in the hospital variable was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Furthermore, there were correlations between CDs and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, and stress, although they were not statistically significant. Ultimately, PTSD (BF = 0.58, P = 0.02), older age (BF = 0.0001, P = 0.0001), hospitalization at hospital A (BF = 0.35, P = 0.001), lower arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) (BF = 0.01, P = 0.0001), and longer hospitalization (BF = 0.001, P = 0.0001) were identified as the most robust predictors for the presence of CDs among individuals recovering from COVID-19. Conclusions: In conclusion, CDs were observed in less than half (27%) of individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. Sociodemographic and health disparities contributed to variations in the prevalence, severity, and significance of these disorders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Neuroscience
Archives of Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Archives of neuroscience is a clinical and basic journal which is informative to all practitioners like Neurosurgeons, Neurologists, Psychiatrists, Neuroscientists. It is the official journal of Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center. The Major theme of this journal is to follow the path of scientific collaboration, spontaneity, and goodwill for the future, by providing up-to-date knowledge for the readers. The journal aims at covering different fields, as the name implies, ranging from research in basic and clinical sciences to core topics such as patient care, education, procuring and correct utilization of resources and bringing to limelight the cherished goals of the institute in providing a standard care for the physically disabled patients. This quarterly journal offers a venue for our researchers and scientists to vent their innovative and constructive research works. The scope of the journal is as far wide as the universe as being declared by the name of the journal, but our aim is to pursue our sacred goals in providing a panacea for the intractable ailments, which leave a psychological element in the daily life of such patients. This authoritative clinical and basic journal was founded by Professor Madjid Samii in 2012.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信