中国农业水权市场绩效评价(2002-2020 年)

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
Water Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.2166/wp.2023.232
Xiaoping Dai, Dustin Garrick, Jesper Svensson, Jingang Li, Qiong Yue
{"title":"中国农业水权市场绩效评价(2002-2020 年)","authors":"Xiaoping Dai, Dustin Garrick, Jesper Svensson, Jingang Li, Qiong Yue","doi":"10.2166/wp.2023.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The water rights market has been promoted in China since 2000. The lack of data and suitable evaluation methods impeded efforts to evaluate the market performance systematically. This research examines the characteristics, performance, and variation of China's agricultural water rights market (AWRM) on the basis of data from the field investigation, China Water Exchange, academic literature, and policy documents. We construct a comprehensive evaluation index system from the aspect of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability and quantitatively evaluate the performance of seven typical agricultural water markets in China. From 2002 to 2020, there were 1,752 cases of agricultural water transactions in China, with a total trading volume of 10.09 million m3. The market scale is increasing and the development of AWRM can be divided into three stages. Most agricultural water rights transactions happened in the west and the north. The average performance of typical AWRMs was poor. Typical water markets had the highest score for fairness and the lowest score for sustainability. Water markets in the humid areas performed the best, whereas the markets in the higher transaction level performed better. Water markets in areas with higher economic development had better performance.","PeriodicalId":49370,"journal":{"name":"Water Policy","volume":"902 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of China's agricultural water rights markets (2002–2020)\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoping Dai, Dustin Garrick, Jesper Svensson, Jingang Li, Qiong Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wp.2023.232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The water rights market has been promoted in China since 2000. The lack of data and suitable evaluation methods impeded efforts to evaluate the market performance systematically. This research examines the characteristics, performance, and variation of China's agricultural water rights market (AWRM) on the basis of data from the field investigation, China Water Exchange, academic literature, and policy documents. We construct a comprehensive evaluation index system from the aspect of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability and quantitatively evaluate the performance of seven typical agricultural water markets in China. From 2002 to 2020, there were 1,752 cases of agricultural water transactions in China, with a total trading volume of 10.09 million m3. The market scale is increasing and the development of AWRM can be divided into three stages. Most agricultural water rights transactions happened in the west and the north. The average performance of typical AWRMs was poor. Typical water markets had the highest score for fairness and the lowest score for sustainability. Water markets in the humid areas performed the best, whereas the markets in the higher transaction level performed better. Water markets in areas with higher economic development had better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Policy\",\"volume\":\"902 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国自 2000 年起开始推广水权市场。由于缺乏数据和合适的评估方法,阻碍了对市场绩效的系统评估。本研究以实地调查数据、中国水交所数据、学术文献和政策文件为基础,研究了中国农业水权市场(AWRM)的特征、绩效和变异。从效率、公平、可持续性等方面构建了综合评价指标体系,并对中国七个典型农业水权市场的绩效进行了定量评价。从 2002 年到 2020 年,中国共发生农业用水交易 1752 起,总交易量为 1009 万立方米。市场规模不断扩大,农业水权市场的发展可分为三个阶段。大部分农业水权交易发生在西部和北部地区。典型 AWRM 的平均绩效较差。典型水市场的公平性得分最高,可持续性得分最低。潮湿地区的水市场表现最好,而交易水平较高的水市场表现较好。经济发展水平较高地区的水市场表现较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of China's agricultural water rights markets (2002–2020)
The water rights market has been promoted in China since 2000. The lack of data and suitable evaluation methods impeded efforts to evaluate the market performance systematically. This research examines the characteristics, performance, and variation of China's agricultural water rights market (AWRM) on the basis of data from the field investigation, China Water Exchange, academic literature, and policy documents. We construct a comprehensive evaluation index system from the aspect of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability and quantitatively evaluate the performance of seven typical agricultural water markets in China. From 2002 to 2020, there were 1,752 cases of agricultural water transactions in China, with a total trading volume of 10.09 million m3. The market scale is increasing and the development of AWRM can be divided into three stages. Most agricultural water rights transactions happened in the west and the north. The average performance of typical AWRMs was poor. Typical water markets had the highest score for fairness and the lowest score for sustainability. Water markets in the humid areas performed the best, whereas the markets in the higher transaction level performed better. Water markets in areas with higher economic development had better performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Policy
Water Policy 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Policy will publish reviews, research papers and progress reports in, among others, the following areas: financial, diplomatic, organizational, legal, administrative and research; organized by country, region or river basin. Water Policy also publishes reviews of books and grey literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信