基于修订版布鲁姆分类法的初中数学教科书能力认知水平测试题分析

Freddy Giawa, Jodi Mahmud Siregar, Dian Armanto
{"title":"基于修订版布鲁姆分类法的初中数学教科书能力认知水平测试题分析","authors":"Freddy Giawa, Jodi Mahmud Siregar, Dian Armanto","doi":"10.57008/jjp.v3i04.607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive ability is one of the substantial things in learning mathematics so that textbooks which act as the main source of learning should encourage the development of students' cognitive abilities and learning goals. The aim of this research is to describe the results of the cognitive level analysis of junior high school mathematics textbooks for class VII semester I based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy and numeracy. The type of research used is descriptive research. Data was collected by recording and coding the contents of the book which focused on example questions, Let's Practice questions and Competency Test questions. The data analysis technique uses descriptive statistics. The results of the research show that there are several existing literature studies that the cognitive level analysis of competency test questions in mathematics books must be revised so that students can understand the mechanism of questions according to the reading material regarding the contents of the book. The questions contained in textbooks do not contain a good proportion between each cognitive level, and there are still few numeracy questions involving personal, social or scientific contexts.","PeriodicalId":174760,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis Of The Cognitive Level Of Competency Test Questions In Junior High School Mathematics Textbooks Based On The Revised Bloom Taxonomy\",\"authors\":\"Freddy Giawa, Jodi Mahmud Siregar, Dian Armanto\",\"doi\":\"10.57008/jjp.v3i04.607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive ability is one of the substantial things in learning mathematics so that textbooks which act as the main source of learning should encourage the development of students' cognitive abilities and learning goals. The aim of this research is to describe the results of the cognitive level analysis of junior high school mathematics textbooks for class VII semester I based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy and numeracy. The type of research used is descriptive research. Data was collected by recording and coding the contents of the book which focused on example questions, Let's Practice questions and Competency Test questions. The data analysis technique uses descriptive statistics. The results of the research show that there are several existing literature studies that the cognitive level analysis of competency test questions in mathematics books must be revised so that students can understand the mechanism of questions according to the reading material regarding the contents of the book. The questions contained in textbooks do not contain a good proportion between each cognitive level, and there are still few numeracy questions involving personal, social or scientific contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v3i04.607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v3i04.607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知能力是数学学习的重要内容之一,因此,作为学习主要来源的教科书应鼓励发展学生的认知能力和学习目标。本研究的目的是根据修订后的布鲁姆分类法和计算能力,描述初中数学教科书(七年级第一学期)的认知水平分析结果。采用的研究类型是描述性研究。收集数据的方法是记录和编码书中的内容,重点是例题、"让我们练习 "问题和能力测试问题。数据分析技术采用描述性统计。研究结果表明,现有的一些文献研究认为,必须对数学书中能力测试题的认知水平分析进行修订,以便学生能够根据阅读材料中有关书本内容的内容来理解问题的机理。教科书中的试题在各个认知水平之间的比例并不理想,涉及个人、社会或科学背景的运算试题仍然很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis Of The Cognitive Level Of Competency Test Questions In Junior High School Mathematics Textbooks Based On The Revised Bloom Taxonomy
Cognitive ability is one of the substantial things in learning mathematics so that textbooks which act as the main source of learning should encourage the development of students' cognitive abilities and learning goals. The aim of this research is to describe the results of the cognitive level analysis of junior high school mathematics textbooks for class VII semester I based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy and numeracy. The type of research used is descriptive research. Data was collected by recording and coding the contents of the book which focused on example questions, Let's Practice questions and Competency Test questions. The data analysis technique uses descriptive statistics. The results of the research show that there are several existing literature studies that the cognitive level analysis of competency test questions in mathematics books must be revised so that students can understand the mechanism of questions according to the reading material regarding the contents of the book. The questions contained in textbooks do not contain a good proportion between each cognitive level, and there are still few numeracy questions involving personal, social or scientific contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信