{"title":"中世纪匈牙利王国教会管理的几个问题","authors":"Gábor Thoroczkay","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2023.12.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study deals with four problems of medieval Hungarian church law and church history. Firstly, it describes the debates surrounding the formation and status of the archbishopric of Kalocsa, emphasising the missionary nature of the early archbishopric; secondly, it discusses the relationship between archdeaconries associated with a provostship and collegiate chapters, stressing the primacy of archdeaconries; thirdly, it examines the question of the Eigenbistümer in Hungary, agreeing with the view that the bishopric of Nitra was initially such a church. In the fourth place, it interprets a sentence of a fourteenth-century Hungarian chronicle, stating that Gregory of Bicske, the elected Archbishop of Esztergom (1298–1303), was only the governor (procurator seu administrator) of the Archbishopric of Esztergom.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Einige Fragen der Kirchenverwaltung des mittelalterlichen ungarischen Königtums\",\"authors\":\"Gábor Thoroczkay\",\"doi\":\"10.15170/spmnnv.2023.12.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study deals with four problems of medieval Hungarian church law and church history. Firstly, it describes the debates surrounding the formation and status of the archbishopric of Kalocsa, emphasising the missionary nature of the early archbishopric; secondly, it discusses the relationship between archdeaconries associated with a provostship and collegiate chapters, stressing the primacy of archdeaconries; thirdly, it examines the question of the Eigenbistümer in Hungary, agreeing with the view that the bishopric of Nitra was initially such a church. In the fourth place, it interprets a sentence of a fourteenth-century Hungarian chronicle, stating that Gregory of Bicske, the elected Archbishop of Esztergom (1298–1303), was only the governor (procurator seu administrator) of the Archbishopric of Esztergom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2023.12.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2023.12.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
该研究涉及中世纪匈牙利教会法和教会史的四个问题。首先,它描述了围绕卡洛克萨大主教区的形成和地位展开的争论,强调了早期大主教区的传教性质;其次,它讨论了与教务长职位相关的大主教区与合议庭之间的关系,强调了大主教区的首要地位;第三,它研究了匈牙利的 Eigenbistümer 问题,同意尼特拉主教区最初就是这样一个教会的观点。第四,它解释了 14 世纪匈牙利编年史中的一句话,即当选的埃斯泰尔戈姆大主教 Gregory of Bicske(1298-1303 年)只是埃斯泰尔戈姆大主教区的总督(procurator seu administrator)。
Einige Fragen der Kirchenverwaltung des mittelalterlichen ungarischen Königtums
The study deals with four problems of medieval Hungarian church law and church history. Firstly, it describes the debates surrounding the formation and status of the archbishopric of Kalocsa, emphasising the missionary nature of the early archbishopric; secondly, it discusses the relationship between archdeaconries associated with a provostship and collegiate chapters, stressing the primacy of archdeaconries; thirdly, it examines the question of the Eigenbistümer in Hungary, agreeing with the view that the bishopric of Nitra was initially such a church. In the fourth place, it interprets a sentence of a fourteenth-century Hungarian chronicle, stating that Gregory of Bicske, the elected Archbishop of Esztergom (1298–1303), was only the governor (procurator seu administrator) of the Archbishopric of Esztergom.