学生对功能材料的反思-冲动认知风格的误解分析

Aas Uswatun Hasanah, Arif Muchyidin, Budi Manfaat, Article Info
{"title":"学生对功能材料的反思-冲动认知风格的误解分析","authors":"Aas Uswatun Hasanah, Arif Muchyidin, Budi Manfaat, Article Info","doi":"10.58421/misro.v2i3.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students generally experience errors in two forms, namely conceptual and execution errors. Conceptual errors are related to students' lack of understanding, while execution errors occur when attempting to solve problems with incomplete procedures. This study aims to measure students' understanding of concepts after learning. The misconception analysis in this study used a four-tier diagnostic test. The results of this test provide five categories of student answers, namely understanding concept (understand), incomplete understanding (partial understanding), misconception, not understanding the concept (not understand), and cannot be coded (uncode). This research uses a mixed method. The data analysis phase is carried out by analyzing the data collected as Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), four-tier diagnostic test data results, and in-depth interview data based on the results of the study concluded that in terms of students' reflective-impulsive cognitive style, impulsive students tend to experience higher misconceptions than reflective students.","PeriodicalId":105115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misconceptions Analysis of Students' Reflective-Impulsive Cognitive Style on Function Material\",\"authors\":\"Aas Uswatun Hasanah, Arif Muchyidin, Budi Manfaat, Article Info\",\"doi\":\"10.58421/misro.v2i3.192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students generally experience errors in two forms, namely conceptual and execution errors. Conceptual errors are related to students' lack of understanding, while execution errors occur when attempting to solve problems with incomplete procedures. This study aims to measure students' understanding of concepts after learning. The misconception analysis in this study used a four-tier diagnostic test. The results of this test provide five categories of student answers, namely understanding concept (understand), incomplete understanding (partial understanding), misconception, not understanding the concept (not understand), and cannot be coded (uncode). This research uses a mixed method. The data analysis phase is carried out by analyzing the data collected as Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), four-tier diagnostic test data results, and in-depth interview data based on the results of the study concluded that in terms of students' reflective-impulsive cognitive style, impulsive students tend to experience higher misconceptions than reflective students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i3.192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i3.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生一般会遇到两种形式的错误,即概念错误和执行错误。概念错误与学生缺乏理解有关,而执行错误则发生在试图用不完整的程序解决问题时。本研究旨在测量学生学习后对概念的理解。本研究的误解分析采用了四级诊断测试。该测试结果提供了五类学生答案,即理解概念(理解)、不完全理解(部分理解)、误解、不理解概念(不理解)和无法编码(无法编码)。本研究采用混合方法。数据分析阶段通过分析收集到的熟悉图形匹配测试(MFFT)数据、四级诊断测试数据结果和深度访谈数据,根据研究结果得出结论:在学生的反思-冲动认知风格方面,冲动型学生往往比反思型学生出现更多的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misconceptions Analysis of Students' Reflective-Impulsive Cognitive Style on Function Material
Students generally experience errors in two forms, namely conceptual and execution errors. Conceptual errors are related to students' lack of understanding, while execution errors occur when attempting to solve problems with incomplete procedures. This study aims to measure students' understanding of concepts after learning. The misconception analysis in this study used a four-tier diagnostic test. The results of this test provide five categories of student answers, namely understanding concept (understand), incomplete understanding (partial understanding), misconception, not understanding the concept (not understand), and cannot be coded (uncode). This research uses a mixed method. The data analysis phase is carried out by analyzing the data collected as Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), four-tier diagnostic test data results, and in-depth interview data based on the results of the study concluded that in terms of students' reflective-impulsive cognitive style, impulsive students tend to experience higher misconceptions than reflective students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信