正常人胎材料通径分析两种面中生长模型的试验。

The Cleft palate journal Pub Date : 1989-04-01
M P Mooney, M I Siegel, K R Kimes, J Todhunter
{"title":"正常人胎材料通径分析两种面中生长模型的试验。","authors":"M P Mooney,&nbsp;M I Siegel,&nbsp;K R Kimes,&nbsp;J Todhunter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictions about the temporal sequencing (i.e., primacy) and causal relationships between various midfacial growth components, as suggested by two midfacial growth models (functional matrix and septal traction), were examined in the present study. The relationships between quantitative changes in the nasal septum, nasal airway, nasolabial musculature, and premaxilla of 15 normal human fetal specimens, ranging in age from 12 to 20 weeks postmenstrual age, were assessed using the multivariate technique of path analysis. Path analysis results revealed that the causal sequence of variables proposed by the septal-traction model explained more of the variance in premaxillary size (87 percent goodness-of-fit) than did the sequence of variables proposed by the functional matrix model (65 percent goodness-of-fit). These results suggest that the septal-traction model may be a more parsimonious and primary explanation of early human fetal midfacial growth than the functional matrix model. Path analysis results also reiterate the observed complex developmental relationships within the fetal labioseptopremaxillary region, knowledge of which may be important in the surgical management of infants with complete cleft.</p>","PeriodicalId":76622,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate journal","volume":"26 2","pages":"93-9; discussion 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A test of two midfacial growth models using path analysis of normal human fetal material.\",\"authors\":\"M P Mooney,&nbsp;M I Siegel,&nbsp;K R Kimes,&nbsp;J Todhunter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Predictions about the temporal sequencing (i.e., primacy) and causal relationships between various midfacial growth components, as suggested by two midfacial growth models (functional matrix and septal traction), were examined in the present study. The relationships between quantitative changes in the nasal septum, nasal airway, nasolabial musculature, and premaxilla of 15 normal human fetal specimens, ranging in age from 12 to 20 weeks postmenstrual age, were assessed using the multivariate technique of path analysis. Path analysis results revealed that the causal sequence of variables proposed by the septal-traction model explained more of the variance in premaxillary size (87 percent goodness-of-fit) than did the sequence of variables proposed by the functional matrix model (65 percent goodness-of-fit). These results suggest that the septal-traction model may be a more parsimonious and primary explanation of early human fetal midfacial growth than the functional matrix model. Path analysis results also reiterate the observed complex developmental relationships within the fetal labioseptopremaxillary region, knowledge of which may be important in the surgical management of infants with complete cleft.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate journal\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"93-9; discussion 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检验了两种面部中生长模型(功能矩阵和间隔牵引)所提示的面部中生长成分之间的时间序列(即首要性)和因果关系的预测。采用多变量通径分析技术,对15例经后12 ~ 20周的正常人胎标本的鼻中隔、鼻气道、鼻唇肌和上颌骨的定量变化进行了分析。通径分析结果显示,与功能矩阵模型(65%拟合优度)提出的变量序列相比,隔膜牵引模型提出的变量因果序列更能解释上颌前大小的差异(87%的拟合优度)。这些结果表明,与功能基质模型相比,隔膜牵引模型可能是早期人类胎儿面中生长的更简洁和主要的解释。通径分析结果也重申了观察到的胎儿唇中隔-上颌区域内复杂的发育关系,了解这些关系可能对完全性唇裂婴儿的外科治疗很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A test of two midfacial growth models using path analysis of normal human fetal material.

Predictions about the temporal sequencing (i.e., primacy) and causal relationships between various midfacial growth components, as suggested by two midfacial growth models (functional matrix and septal traction), were examined in the present study. The relationships between quantitative changes in the nasal septum, nasal airway, nasolabial musculature, and premaxilla of 15 normal human fetal specimens, ranging in age from 12 to 20 weeks postmenstrual age, were assessed using the multivariate technique of path analysis. Path analysis results revealed that the causal sequence of variables proposed by the septal-traction model explained more of the variance in premaxillary size (87 percent goodness-of-fit) than did the sequence of variables proposed by the functional matrix model (65 percent goodness-of-fit). These results suggest that the septal-traction model may be a more parsimonious and primary explanation of early human fetal midfacial growth than the functional matrix model. Path analysis results also reiterate the observed complex developmental relationships within the fetal labioseptopremaxillary region, knowledge of which may be important in the surgical management of infants with complete cleft.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信