加入再生骨料对土工聚合物混凝土性能的影响以及提高骨料堆积密度的方法

IF 1.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tanuja Gupta, M. Chakradhara Rao
{"title":"加入再生骨料对土工聚合物混凝土性能的影响以及提高骨料堆积密度的方法","authors":"Tanuja Gupta, M. Chakradhara Rao","doi":"10.1108/wje-04-2023-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to practically determine the optimum proportion of aggregates to attain the desired strength of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and then compare the results using established analytical particle packing methods. The investigation further aims to assess the influence of various amounts of recycled aggregate (RA) on properties of low-calcium fly ash-based GPC of grade M25. Design/methodology/approach Fine and coarse aggregates were blended in various proportions and the proportion yielding maximum packing density was selected as the optimum proportion and they were compared with analytical models, such as Modified Toufar Model (MTM) and J. D. Dewar Model. RAs for this study were produced in laboratory and they were used in various amounts, namely, 0%, 50% and 100%. 12M NaOH solution was mixed with Na2SiO3 in the ratio of 1:2. The curing of concrete was done at the temperatures of 60° and 90 °C for 24, 48 and 72h. Findings The experimentally obtained optimum proportion of coarse to fine aggregate was 60:40 for all amounts of RA. Meanwhile, MTM and Dewar Model resulted in coarse aggregate to fine aggregates as 40:60, 45:55, 55:45 and 55:45, 35:65, 60:40, respectively, for 0% 100% and 50% RAs. The compressive strength of GPC elevated with the increase in curing regime. In addition, the ultrasonic pulse velocity also displayed a similar trend as that of strength. Originality/value The GPC with 50% RAs may be considered for use, as it exhibited superior properties compared to GPC with 100% RAs and was comparable to GPC with natural aggregates. Furthermore, compressive strength is correlated with split tensile strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity.","PeriodicalId":23852,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect on properties of geopolymer concrete by inclusion of recycled aggregate and methods to enhance the packing density of aggregate\",\"authors\":\"Tanuja Gupta, M. Chakradhara Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/wje-04-2023-0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study aims to practically determine the optimum proportion of aggregates to attain the desired strength of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and then compare the results using established analytical particle packing methods. The investigation further aims to assess the influence of various amounts of recycled aggregate (RA) on properties of low-calcium fly ash-based GPC of grade M25. Design/methodology/approach Fine and coarse aggregates were blended in various proportions and the proportion yielding maximum packing density was selected as the optimum proportion and they were compared with analytical models, such as Modified Toufar Model (MTM) and J. D. Dewar Model. RAs for this study were produced in laboratory and they were used in various amounts, namely, 0%, 50% and 100%. 12M NaOH solution was mixed with Na2SiO3 in the ratio of 1:2. The curing of concrete was done at the temperatures of 60° and 90 °C for 24, 48 and 72h. Findings The experimentally obtained optimum proportion of coarse to fine aggregate was 60:40 for all amounts of RA. Meanwhile, MTM and Dewar Model resulted in coarse aggregate to fine aggregates as 40:60, 45:55, 55:45 and 55:45, 35:65, 60:40, respectively, for 0% 100% and 50% RAs. The compressive strength of GPC elevated with the increase in curing regime. In addition, the ultrasonic pulse velocity also displayed a similar trend as that of strength. Originality/value The GPC with 50% RAs may be considered for use, as it exhibited superior properties compared to GPC with 100% RAs and was comparable to GPC with natural aggregates. Furthermore, compressive strength is correlated with split tensile strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Engineering\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/wje-04-2023-0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wje-04-2023-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在实际确定骨料的最佳比例,以达到土工聚合物混凝土(GPC)的理想强度,然后使用既定的颗粒包装分析方法对结果进行比较。调查还旨在评估不同数量的再生骨料(RA)对 M25 级低钙粉煤灰基土工聚合物混凝土性能的影响。 设计/方法/途径 以不同比例混合细骨料和粗骨料,并选择产生最大堆积密度的比例作为最佳比例,然后将其与分析模型(如修正的图法模型(MTM)和 J. D. Dewar 模型)进行比较。本研究中的 RA 是在实验室中生产的,使用量各不相同,分别为 0%、50% 和 100%。12M NaOH 溶液与 Na2SiO3 按 1:2 的比例混合。混凝土在 60° 和 90 °C 的温度下分别养护 24、48 和 72 小时。 结果 实验得出,在所有 RA 用量下,粗骨料与细骨料的最佳比例为 60:40。同时,MTM 和 Dewar 模型得出,在 0% 100% 和 50% RA 的情况下,粗骨料与细骨料的比例分别为 40:60、45:55、55:45 和 55:45、35:65、60:40。GPC 的抗压强度随着固化制度的增加而提高。此外,超声波脉冲速度也显示出与强度相似的趋势。 独创性/价值 与含 100% RAs 的 GPC 相比,含 50% RAs 的 GPC 表现出更优越的性能,与含天然集料的 GPC 相媲美,因此可考虑使用含 50% RAs 的 GPC。此外,抗压强度与劈裂拉伸强度和超声波脉冲速度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect on properties of geopolymer concrete by inclusion of recycled aggregate and methods to enhance the packing density of aggregate
Purpose This study aims to practically determine the optimum proportion of aggregates to attain the desired strength of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and then compare the results using established analytical particle packing methods. The investigation further aims to assess the influence of various amounts of recycled aggregate (RA) on properties of low-calcium fly ash-based GPC of grade M25. Design/methodology/approach Fine and coarse aggregates were blended in various proportions and the proportion yielding maximum packing density was selected as the optimum proportion and they were compared with analytical models, such as Modified Toufar Model (MTM) and J. D. Dewar Model. RAs for this study were produced in laboratory and they were used in various amounts, namely, 0%, 50% and 100%. 12M NaOH solution was mixed with Na2SiO3 in the ratio of 1:2. The curing of concrete was done at the temperatures of 60° and 90 °C for 24, 48 and 72h. Findings The experimentally obtained optimum proportion of coarse to fine aggregate was 60:40 for all amounts of RA. Meanwhile, MTM and Dewar Model resulted in coarse aggregate to fine aggregates as 40:60, 45:55, 55:45 and 55:45, 35:65, 60:40, respectively, for 0% 100% and 50% RAs. The compressive strength of GPC elevated with the increase in curing regime. In addition, the ultrasonic pulse velocity also displayed a similar trend as that of strength. Originality/value The GPC with 50% RAs may be considered for use, as it exhibited superior properties compared to GPC with 100% RAs and was comparable to GPC with natural aggregates. Furthermore, compressive strength is correlated with split tensile strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Engineering
World Journal of Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The main focus of the World Journal of Engineering (WJE) is on, but not limited to; Civil Engineering, Material and Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Geotechnical and Mining Engineering, Nanoengineering and Nanoscience The journal bridges the gap between materials science and materials engineering, and between nano-engineering and nano-science. A distinguished editorial board assists the Editor-in-Chief, Professor Sun. All papers undergo a double-blind peer review process. For a full list of the journal''s esteemed review board, please see below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信