人工智能在骨折检测中的表现及其对医生工作的影响:系统性综述

Y.-H. Tang, E. Ranschaert, K. Verstraete
{"title":"人工智能在骨折检测中的表现及其对医生工作的影响:系统性综述","authors":"Y.-H. Tang, E. Ranschaert, K. Verstraete","doi":"10.47671/tvg.79.23.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance of AI in fracture detection on radiography and its effect on the performance of physicians: a systematic review This systematic review has a twofold objective regarding the evaluation of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for fracture detection on radiography. The first is to examine the performance of the current AI algorithms. The second concerns an evaluation of the effect of AI support on the performance of physicians in fracture detection. A systematic literature search was performed in 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Fourteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were divided into 2 categories: a first group in which a comparison was made between the performance of AI and the performance of physicians and a second group comparing the performance of physicians with and physicians without AI aid. Seven studies reported a comparable or superior fracture detection performance for AI compared to physicians, including radiologists. One study established a comparable performance on the internal test. On the external test, a lower AI performance was found compared to physicians. The second group of 6 studies reported a positive effect on the fracture detection performance of physicians when aided by AI. The current AI algorithms have a fracture detection performance comparable with physicians. At present, AI can be used as an aid in fracture detection. The potential impact of AI as an aid is greater with regard to less experienced doctors. The biggest hurdle of the current AI algorithms is the lack of large quantities of high-quality training data. Prospective studies, as well as further development and training of detection algorithms are needed in the future, in addition to larger datasets.","PeriodicalId":23124,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde","volume":"277 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performantie van AI bij fractuurdetectie en effect op de prestaties van artsen: een systematische review\",\"authors\":\"Y.-H. Tang, E. Ranschaert, K. Verstraete\",\"doi\":\"10.47671/tvg.79.23.076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performance of AI in fracture detection on radiography and its effect on the performance of physicians: a systematic review This systematic review has a twofold objective regarding the evaluation of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for fracture detection on radiography. The first is to examine the performance of the current AI algorithms. The second concerns an evaluation of the effect of AI support on the performance of physicians in fracture detection. A systematic literature search was performed in 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Fourteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were divided into 2 categories: a first group in which a comparison was made between the performance of AI and the performance of physicians and a second group comparing the performance of physicians with and physicians without AI aid. Seven studies reported a comparable or superior fracture detection performance for AI compared to physicians, including radiologists. One study established a comparable performance on the internal test. On the external test, a lower AI performance was found compared to physicians. The second group of 6 studies reported a positive effect on the fracture detection performance of physicians when aided by AI. The current AI algorithms have a fracture detection performance comparable with physicians. At present, AI can be used as an aid in fracture detection. The potential impact of AI as an aid is greater with regard to less experienced doctors. The biggest hurdle of the current AI algorithms is the lack of large quantities of high-quality training data. Prospective studies, as well as further development and training of detection algorithms are needed in the future, in addition to larger datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"277 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.79.23.076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.79.23.076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能在射线照相术骨折检测中的表现及其对医生工作表现的影响:系统综述 本系统综述有两个目的,即评估人工智能(AI)在射线照相术骨折检测中的应用。首先是检查当前人工智能算法的性能。其次是评估人工智能支持对医生进行骨折检测的影响。 我们在 4 个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索:PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 CENTRAL。 14项研究符合纳入和排除标准。这些研究分为两类:第一类比较人工智能和医生的表现,第二类比较有人工智能辅助的医生和没有人工智能辅助的医生的表现。有七项研究报告称,人工智能的骨折检测性能与医生(包括放射科医生)相当或更优。一项研究确定了内部测试的性能相当。在外部测试中,发现人工智能的性能低于医生。第二组的 6 项研究报告称,在人工智能的辅助下,医生的骨折检测性能得到了提升。 目前人工智能算法的骨折检测性能与医生不相上下。目前,人工智能可用作骨折检测的辅助工具。对于经验不足的医生来说,人工智能作为辅助工具的潜在影响更大。目前人工智能算法的最大障碍是缺乏大量高质量的训练数据。未来除了需要更大的数据集之外,还需要进行前瞻性研究以及进一步开发和培训检测算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performantie van AI bij fractuurdetectie en effect op de prestaties van artsen: een systematische review
Performance of AI in fracture detection on radiography and its effect on the performance of physicians: a systematic review This systematic review has a twofold objective regarding the evaluation of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for fracture detection on radiography. The first is to examine the performance of the current AI algorithms. The second concerns an evaluation of the effect of AI support on the performance of physicians in fracture detection. A systematic literature search was performed in 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Fourteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were divided into 2 categories: a first group in which a comparison was made between the performance of AI and the performance of physicians and a second group comparing the performance of physicians with and physicians without AI aid. Seven studies reported a comparable or superior fracture detection performance for AI compared to physicians, including radiologists. One study established a comparable performance on the internal test. On the external test, a lower AI performance was found compared to physicians. The second group of 6 studies reported a positive effect on the fracture detection performance of physicians when aided by AI. The current AI algorithms have a fracture detection performance comparable with physicians. At present, AI can be used as an aid in fracture detection. The potential impact of AI as an aid is greater with regard to less experienced doctors. The biggest hurdle of the current AI algorithms is the lack of large quantities of high-quality training data. Prospective studies, as well as further development and training of detection algorithms are needed in the future, in addition to larger datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信