新型冠状病毒感染后轻度血管性痴呆老年患者的疾病态度和生活质量

N.M. Zalutskaya, I.I. Khyanikyaynen, A. A. Dmitryakova
{"title":"新型冠状病毒感染后轻度血管性痴呆老年患者的疾病态度和生活质量","authors":"N.M. Zalutskaya, I.I. Khyanikyaynen, A. A. Dmitryakova","doi":"10.33920/med-01-2311-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to study the types of attitude towards the disease and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia (MVD) living in the conditions of the psychoneurological institution Social Service House “Severnoye Izmailovo” in Moscow, there were 2 study groups: the patients with the clinical debut of the novel coronavirus infection (NCVI) of 6 months +/– 1 month with the recovery outcome (n=65; 33 men, 32 women) and those who did not have COVID-19 (hospital control group; n=67; 34 men, 33 women). The mean age of the studied patients was 73.05±3.48 years. The age and sex composition of the two groups was homogeneous (p>0.05). Emotional disorders were investigated using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD); cognitive disorders – by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); QoL – by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale (QoL-AD): QoL self-assessment (QoL-AD-SR (self-rating)) and proxy QoL rating (QoL-AD-PR (proxy rating)); the type of attitude towards the disease – by the TATD scale (Wasserman L.I. et al., 2005). It was found that COVID-19 aggravates cognitive deficits in patients with MVD (according to MoCA 20.80±0.59 /21.40±0.78 points; p<0.05) in the absence of depression (according to CSDD 1.52±0.50 / 1.52±0.84 points in the group of the patients after NCVI / hospital control group, respectively; p>0.05). In the patients after COVID-19, a correlation was found between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of cognitive dysfunction according to the MoCA (R= – 0.28), while in the hospital control group – between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of depressive manifestations (R= – 0.33). The first group of the patients was characterized by a mixed type of attitude to the disease and intrapsychic maladaptation (the neurasthenic type ranked first at 16.03±8.29 / 9.34±5.03 points), while the second group had a diffuse type of attitude to the disease and interpsychic maladaptation (the sensitive type ranked first at 10.31±5.71 / 14.90±7.62 points by the TATD scale among the elderly patients with MVD who have / have not undergone NCVI; p<0.05). The revealed patterns can contribute to the optimization of personalized models of medical and psychological rehabilitation of elderly patients with MVD living in closed-type care facilities.","PeriodicalId":447580,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitude to the disease and quality of life in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia after the novel coronavirus infection\",\"authors\":\"N.M. Zalutskaya, I.I. Khyanikyaynen, A. A. Dmitryakova\",\"doi\":\"10.33920/med-01-2311-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to study the types of attitude towards the disease and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia (MVD) living in the conditions of the psychoneurological institution Social Service House “Severnoye Izmailovo” in Moscow, there were 2 study groups: the patients with the clinical debut of the novel coronavirus infection (NCVI) of 6 months +/– 1 month with the recovery outcome (n=65; 33 men, 32 women) and those who did not have COVID-19 (hospital control group; n=67; 34 men, 33 women). The mean age of the studied patients was 73.05±3.48 years. The age and sex composition of the two groups was homogeneous (p>0.05). Emotional disorders were investigated using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD); cognitive disorders – by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); QoL – by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale (QoL-AD): QoL self-assessment (QoL-AD-SR (self-rating)) and proxy QoL rating (QoL-AD-PR (proxy rating)); the type of attitude towards the disease – by the TATD scale (Wasserman L.I. et al., 2005). It was found that COVID-19 aggravates cognitive deficits in patients with MVD (according to MoCA 20.80±0.59 /21.40±0.78 points; p<0.05) in the absence of depression (according to CSDD 1.52±0.50 / 1.52±0.84 points in the group of the patients after NCVI / hospital control group, respectively; p>0.05). In the patients after COVID-19, a correlation was found between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of cognitive dysfunction according to the MoCA (R= – 0.28), while in the hospital control group – between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of depressive manifestations (R= – 0.33). The first group of the patients was characterized by a mixed type of attitude to the disease and intrapsychic maladaptation (the neurasthenic type ranked first at 16.03±8.29 / 9.34±5.03 points), while the second group had a diffuse type of attitude to the disease and interpsychic maladaptation (the sensitive type ranked first at 10.31±5.71 / 14.90±7.62 points by the TATD scale among the elderly patients with MVD who have / have not undergone NCVI; p<0.05). The revealed patterns can contribute to the optimization of personalized models of medical and psychological rehabilitation of elderly patients with MVD living in closed-type care facilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2311-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2311-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究生活在莫斯科 "谢韦尔诺伊-伊兹梅洛沃 "社会服务机构的轻度血管性痴呆(MVD)老年患者对疾病的态度类型和生活质量(QoL),我们分成了两个研究小组:新型冠状病毒感染(NCVI)临床初发 6 个月 +/- 1 个月并痊愈的患者(n=65;33 名男性,32 名女性)和未感染 COVID-19 的患者(医院对照组;n=67;34 名男性,33 名女性)。研究对象的平均年龄为(73.05±3.48)岁。两组患者的年龄和性别构成相同(P>0.05)。情绪障碍采用康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表(CSDD)进行调查;认知障碍采用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)进行调查;生活质量采用阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表(QoL-AD)进行调查:QoL 自我评估(QoL-AD-SR(自我评分))和代用 QoL 评分(QoL-AD-PR(代用评分));对疾病的态度类型--采用 TATD 量表(Wasserman L.I. et al.)研究发现,COVID-19 会加重 MVD 患者的认知障碍(根据 MoCA 20.80±0.59 /21.40±0.78 分;P0.05)。在接受 COVID-19 治疗的患者中,根据 MoCA,代用 QoL 评分与认知功能障碍的严重程度之间存在相关性(R= - 0.28),而在医院对照组中,代用 QoL 评分与抑郁表现的严重程度之间存在相关性(R= - 0.33)。第一组患者的特点是对疾病的态度和心理内部适应不良的混合型(神经衰弱型以 16.03±8.29 分/9.34±5.03 分排名第一),而第二组患者的特点是对疾病的态度和心理内部适应不良的混合型(神经衰弱型以 16.03±8.29 分/9.34±5.03 分排名第一)。03分),而第二组对疾病的态度为弥散型和心理间适应不良型(在接受过/未接受过NCVI的MVD老年患者中,敏感型以10.31±5.71分/14.90±7.62分的TATD量表排名第一;P<0.05)。所揭示的模式有助于优化居住在封闭式护理机构的老年 MVD 患者的个性化医疗和心理康复模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitude to the disease and quality of life in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia after the novel coronavirus infection
In order to study the types of attitude towards the disease and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with mild vascular dementia (MVD) living in the conditions of the psychoneurological institution Social Service House “Severnoye Izmailovo” in Moscow, there were 2 study groups: the patients with the clinical debut of the novel coronavirus infection (NCVI) of 6 months +/– 1 month with the recovery outcome (n=65; 33 men, 32 women) and those who did not have COVID-19 (hospital control group; n=67; 34 men, 33 women). The mean age of the studied patients was 73.05±3.48 years. The age and sex composition of the two groups was homogeneous (p>0.05). Emotional disorders were investigated using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD); cognitive disorders – by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); QoL – by the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease scale (QoL-AD): QoL self-assessment (QoL-AD-SR (self-rating)) and proxy QoL rating (QoL-AD-PR (proxy rating)); the type of attitude towards the disease – by the TATD scale (Wasserman L.I. et al., 2005). It was found that COVID-19 aggravates cognitive deficits in patients with MVD (according to MoCA 20.80±0.59 /21.40±0.78 points; p<0.05) in the absence of depression (according to CSDD 1.52±0.50 / 1.52±0.84 points in the group of the patients after NCVI / hospital control group, respectively; p>0.05). In the patients after COVID-19, a correlation was found between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of cognitive dysfunction according to the MoCA (R= – 0.28), while in the hospital control group – between the proxy QoL rating and the severity of depressive manifestations (R= – 0.33). The first group of the patients was characterized by a mixed type of attitude to the disease and intrapsychic maladaptation (the neurasthenic type ranked first at 16.03±8.29 / 9.34±5.03 points), while the second group had a diffuse type of attitude to the disease and interpsychic maladaptation (the sensitive type ranked first at 10.31±5.71 / 14.90±7.62 points by the TATD scale among the elderly patients with MVD who have / have not undergone NCVI; p<0.05). The revealed patterns can contribute to the optimization of personalized models of medical and psychological rehabilitation of elderly patients with MVD living in closed-type care facilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信