天然林和人工林生态系统中以树木为基础的固碳和储碳能力各不相同

F. Ogbemudia, R. Ita, E. Anwana
{"title":"天然林和人工林生态系统中以树木为基础的固碳和储碳能力各不相同","authors":"F. Ogbemudia, R. Ita, E. Anwana","doi":"10.4314/wojast.v15i1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about the relevance of natural forests and plantations in the wake of global warming and climate change. Understanding the impacts of land use conversion from natural forests to plantations on carbon sequestration and storage is critical for sustainable land and forest management. In this study, tree-based carbon sequestration and storage abilities were assessed in natural and plantation forest ecosystems. Four plots within a natural forest and cashew orchard were randomly chosen and four belt transects were established. In each plot, tree species were identified and their density, height, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) enumerated and measured, respectively. In each plot, litter boxes were placed to collect litter weekly. Soils (at 0 -15 cm and 15 – 30 cm) within each plot were obtained with soil auger. AGB (aboveground biomass), BGB (belowground biomass), AGC (aboveground carbon) and BGC (belowground carbon) were calculated using allometric equations for pan moist and dry tropical forest. Twenty-three and eleven tree species were found in the forest and orchard, respectively. The forest had the largest total biomass allocation (188.61 Mg ha-1) and carbon stock (146.89 Mg C.ha-1) while the orchard had the least total biomass apportionment (37.20 Mg ha-1) and carbon stock (45.60 Mg ha-1). The forest ecosystem had the largest sequestration ability (593.04 Mg CO2ha-1) which followed this trend: aboveground (295.18 Mg CO2ha-1) > belowground (60.51 Mg CO2ha-1) > soils (133.73 Mg CO2ha-1) > litter (49.62 Mg CO2ha-1) while cashew orchard had the least sequestration ability (167.37 Mg CO2ha-1) which followed this order: soil (99.09 Mg CO2ha-1) > litter (35.75 Mg CO2ha-1) > aboveground (27.00 Mg CO2ha-1) > belowground (5.53 Mg CO2ha-1). From these results, land use change affects carbon budgets of ecosystems, hence, this study argues for protection of natural forest while practicing afforestation towards global warming mitigation.","PeriodicalId":353187,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Applied Science & Technology","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tree-based carbon sequestration and storage abilities vary in natural and plantation forest ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"F. Ogbemudia, R. Ita, E. Anwana\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/wojast.v15i1.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Little is known about the relevance of natural forests and plantations in the wake of global warming and climate change. Understanding the impacts of land use conversion from natural forests to plantations on carbon sequestration and storage is critical for sustainable land and forest management. In this study, tree-based carbon sequestration and storage abilities were assessed in natural and plantation forest ecosystems. Four plots within a natural forest and cashew orchard were randomly chosen and four belt transects were established. In each plot, tree species were identified and their density, height, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) enumerated and measured, respectively. In each plot, litter boxes were placed to collect litter weekly. Soils (at 0 -15 cm and 15 – 30 cm) within each plot were obtained with soil auger. AGB (aboveground biomass), BGB (belowground biomass), AGC (aboveground carbon) and BGC (belowground carbon) were calculated using allometric equations for pan moist and dry tropical forest. Twenty-three and eleven tree species were found in the forest and orchard, respectively. The forest had the largest total biomass allocation (188.61 Mg ha-1) and carbon stock (146.89 Mg C.ha-1) while the orchard had the least total biomass apportionment (37.20 Mg ha-1) and carbon stock (45.60 Mg ha-1). The forest ecosystem had the largest sequestration ability (593.04 Mg CO2ha-1) which followed this trend: aboveground (295.18 Mg CO2ha-1) > belowground (60.51 Mg CO2ha-1) > soils (133.73 Mg CO2ha-1) > litter (49.62 Mg CO2ha-1) while cashew orchard had the least sequestration ability (167.37 Mg CO2ha-1) which followed this order: soil (99.09 Mg CO2ha-1) > litter (35.75 Mg CO2ha-1) > aboveground (27.00 Mg CO2ha-1) > belowground (5.53 Mg CO2ha-1). From these results, land use change affects carbon budgets of ecosystems, hence, this study argues for protection of natural forest while practicing afforestation towards global warming mitigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":353187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Applied Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Applied Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/wojast.v15i1.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Applied Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/wojast.v15i1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球变暖和气候变化之后,人们对天然林和人工林的相关性知之甚少。了解从天然林到人工林的土地用途转换对固碳和储碳的影响对于可持续的土地和森林管理至关重要。本研究评估了天然林和人工林生态系统中基于树木的固碳和储碳能力。在天然林和腰果园中随机选择了四个地块,并建立了四个带状横断面。在每个小区内,对树种进行识别,并分别对其密度、高度、胸径(DBH)进行计数和测量。每个小区都放置了垃圾箱,以便每周收集垃圾。每个小区的土壤(0 - 15 厘米和 15 - 30 厘米)都用土壤钻取样。使用泛湿润和干燥热带森林的异速方程计算了 AGB(地上生物量)、BGB(地下生物量)、AGC(地上碳)和 BGC(地下碳)。森林和果园中的树种分别为 23 种和 11 种。森林的生物量分配总量(188.61 兆克/公顷-1)和碳储量(146.89 兆克碳/公顷-1)最大,而果园的生物量分配总量(37.20 兆克/公顷-1)和碳储量(45.60 兆克/公顷-1)最小。森林生态系统的固碳能力最大(593.04 Mg CO2ha-1),其趋势为:地上部分(295.18 Mg CO2ha-1)>地下部分(60.51 Mg CO2ha-1)>土壤(133.73 Mg CO2ha-1)>枯落物(49.62 Mg CO2ha-1)。62 Mg CO2ha-1),而腰果园的固碳能力最小(167.37 Mg CO2ha-1),其顺序为:土壤(99.09 Mg CO2ha-1)>废弃物(35.75 Mg CO2ha-1)>地上部分(27.00 Mg CO2ha-1)>地下部分(5.53 Mg CO2ha-1)。从这些结果来看,土地利用变化会影响生态系统的碳收支,因此,本研究主张在植树造林的同时保护天然林,以减缓全球变暖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tree-based carbon sequestration and storage abilities vary in natural and plantation forest ecosystems
Little is known about the relevance of natural forests and plantations in the wake of global warming and climate change. Understanding the impacts of land use conversion from natural forests to plantations on carbon sequestration and storage is critical for sustainable land and forest management. In this study, tree-based carbon sequestration and storage abilities were assessed in natural and plantation forest ecosystems. Four plots within a natural forest and cashew orchard were randomly chosen and four belt transects were established. In each plot, tree species were identified and their density, height, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) enumerated and measured, respectively. In each plot, litter boxes were placed to collect litter weekly. Soils (at 0 -15 cm and 15 – 30 cm) within each plot were obtained with soil auger. AGB (aboveground biomass), BGB (belowground biomass), AGC (aboveground carbon) and BGC (belowground carbon) were calculated using allometric equations for pan moist and dry tropical forest. Twenty-three and eleven tree species were found in the forest and orchard, respectively. The forest had the largest total biomass allocation (188.61 Mg ha-1) and carbon stock (146.89 Mg C.ha-1) while the orchard had the least total biomass apportionment (37.20 Mg ha-1) and carbon stock (45.60 Mg ha-1). The forest ecosystem had the largest sequestration ability (593.04 Mg CO2ha-1) which followed this trend: aboveground (295.18 Mg CO2ha-1) > belowground (60.51 Mg CO2ha-1) > soils (133.73 Mg CO2ha-1) > litter (49.62 Mg CO2ha-1) while cashew orchard had the least sequestration ability (167.37 Mg CO2ha-1) which followed this order: soil (99.09 Mg CO2ha-1) > litter (35.75 Mg CO2ha-1) > aboveground (27.00 Mg CO2ha-1) > belowground (5.53 Mg CO2ha-1). From these results, land use change affects carbon budgets of ecosystems, hence, this study argues for protection of natural forest while practicing afforestation towards global warming mitigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信