不同教育水平如何影响个人对碳中和的态度和行动?一种新颖的量化回归方法

Isaac Ahakwa, Yi Xu, Evelyn Agba Tackie, Faustina Korkor Tackie, Tinashe Mangudhla, F. Sarpong
{"title":"不同教育水平如何影响个人对碳中和的态度和行动?一种新颖的量化回归方法","authors":"Isaac Ahakwa, Yi Xu, Evelyn Agba Tackie, Faustina Korkor Tackie, Tinashe Mangudhla, F. Sarpong","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231217648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon neutrality in the post-COP26 summit becomes a key goal in the fight against climate change, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs), particularly SDG4, acknowledge the crucial role of education in enhancing both the environment and individual well-being and as a pathway towards attaining other SDGs. Therefore, this paper examines how individuals’ educational levels affect their behavior for realizing carbon neutrality within the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) framework while employing green energy, green finance, and natural resources as additional variables in the study model. This study utilizes robust econometric techniques to ensure accurate and reliable results, employing data from Ghana from 1990 to 2020. The results confirm that the study variables exhibit stationarity and long-term co-integration. Thus, the novel quantile-on-quantile regression (QQR) technique is utilized to analyze the variables’ relationships evolving throughout various quantile levels so as to offer a more nuanced understanding. The results reveal that secondary and tertiary education are beneficial for achieving carbon neutrality, but primary education alone is insufficient. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that green energy and green finance support the realization of carbon neutrality, while natural resources hinder carbon neutrality realization. Furthermore, the study validates the EKC hypothesis in Ghana. Ultimately, it recommends that authorities invest and prioritize the expansion and quality improvement of secondary and tertiary education in Ghana to accelerate the nation's journey towards carbon neutrality, with due recognition of the need to supplement primary education with a robust higher education system focused on sustainability and environmental studies.","PeriodicalId":505265,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How different levels of education affect individuals’ attitudes and actions toward carbon neutrality? A novel quantile-on-quantile regression approach\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Ahakwa, Yi Xu, Evelyn Agba Tackie, Faustina Korkor Tackie, Tinashe Mangudhla, F. Sarpong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305x231217648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Carbon neutrality in the post-COP26 summit becomes a key goal in the fight against climate change, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs), particularly SDG4, acknowledge the crucial role of education in enhancing both the environment and individual well-being and as a pathway towards attaining other SDGs. Therefore, this paper examines how individuals’ educational levels affect their behavior for realizing carbon neutrality within the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) framework while employing green energy, green finance, and natural resources as additional variables in the study model. This study utilizes robust econometric techniques to ensure accurate and reliable results, employing data from Ghana from 1990 to 2020. The results confirm that the study variables exhibit stationarity and long-term co-integration. Thus, the novel quantile-on-quantile regression (QQR) technique is utilized to analyze the variables’ relationships evolving throughout various quantile levels so as to offer a more nuanced understanding. The results reveal that secondary and tertiary education are beneficial for achieving carbon neutrality, but primary education alone is insufficient. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that green energy and green finance support the realization of carbon neutrality, while natural resources hinder carbon neutrality realization. Furthermore, the study validates the EKC hypothesis in Ghana. Ultimately, it recommends that authorities invest and prioritize the expansion and quality improvement of secondary and tertiary education in Ghana to accelerate the nation's journey towards carbon neutrality, with due recognition of the need to supplement primary education with a robust higher education system focused on sustainability and environmental studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231217648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231217648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COP26 峰会后,碳中和成为应对气候变化的关键目标,可持续发展目标(SDGs),尤其是 SDG4,承认教育在改善环境和个人福祉方面的关键作用,也是实现其他 SDGs 的途径。因此,本文在环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)框架内研究了个人教育水平如何影响其实现碳中和的行为,同时将绿色能源、绿色金融和自然资源作为研究模型的附加变量。本研究利用加纳 1990 年至 2020 年的数据,采用稳健的计量经济学技术,以确保结果的准确性和可靠性。结果证实,研究变量表现出静态性和长期协整性。因此,采用了新颖的量化对量化回归(QQR)技术来分析变量在不同量化水平上的演变关系,以提供更细致的理解。结果显示,中等和高等教育有利于实现碳中和,但仅有初等教育是不够的。此外,研究结果表明,绿色能源和绿色金融支持碳中和的实现,而自然资源则阻碍碳中和的实现。此外,研究还验证了加纳的 EKC 假设。最后,研究建议当局投资并优先扩大加纳的中等教育和高等教育并提高其质量,以加快加纳实现碳中和的进程,同时充分认识到需要建立一个以可持续发展和环境研究为重点的强大的高等教育系统来补充初等教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How different levels of education affect individuals’ attitudes and actions toward carbon neutrality? A novel quantile-on-quantile regression approach
Carbon neutrality in the post-COP26 summit becomes a key goal in the fight against climate change, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs), particularly SDG4, acknowledge the crucial role of education in enhancing both the environment and individual well-being and as a pathway towards attaining other SDGs. Therefore, this paper examines how individuals’ educational levels affect their behavior for realizing carbon neutrality within the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) framework while employing green energy, green finance, and natural resources as additional variables in the study model. This study utilizes robust econometric techniques to ensure accurate and reliable results, employing data from Ghana from 1990 to 2020. The results confirm that the study variables exhibit stationarity and long-term co-integration. Thus, the novel quantile-on-quantile regression (QQR) technique is utilized to analyze the variables’ relationships evolving throughout various quantile levels so as to offer a more nuanced understanding. The results reveal that secondary and tertiary education are beneficial for achieving carbon neutrality, but primary education alone is insufficient. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that green energy and green finance support the realization of carbon neutrality, while natural resources hinder carbon neutrality realization. Furthermore, the study validates the EKC hypothesis in Ghana. Ultimately, it recommends that authorities invest and prioritize the expansion and quality improvement of secondary and tertiary education in Ghana to accelerate the nation's journey towards carbon neutrality, with due recognition of the need to supplement primary education with a robust higher education system focused on sustainability and environmental studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信