一项观察性研究:在一家三级医院评估 IOTA 超声波区分良性和恶性卵巢肿块的简单规则及组织病理学相关性

Amatul Kareem Sumaya, Banavath Swetha, Aithagani Ramachandraiah, Nadeem Ahmed, Sunitha Bajaj
{"title":"一项观察性研究:在一家三级医院评估 IOTA 超声波区分良性和恶性卵巢肿块的简单规则及组织病理学相关性","authors":"Amatul Kareem Sumaya, Banavath Swetha, Aithagani Ramachandraiah, Nadeem Ahmed, Sunitha Bajaj","doi":"10.18502/htaa.v7i3.14211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) study technique is a specialized method for classifying and identifying adnexal growths. It employs 10 simple ultrasound directions to characterize masses as benign or malignant. Objectives: This study aims to provide pre-operative information to help gynecologists manage ovarian masses, avoiding delays in malignancy treatment and unnecessary surgery for benign lesions. Methods: This was a hospital-based observational study conducted in the radiology department on patients with clinical diagnoses of ovarian masses from August 2020 to March 2022 by prospective randomized sampling method. Patients with suspected ovarian pathology were evaluated using IOTA ultrasound rules and designated benign or malignant. The patients underwent a thorough history and clinical examination. Ultrasound was used to confirm the ovarian origin of the mass and differentiate it as benign or malignant. A transvaginal ultrasound was performed where necessary. Histopathological examination was the gold standard to confirm ultrasound and Doppler findings. Descriptive stats: Frequencies/percentages for categorical data, mean ± SD for normal, median with IQR for non-normal. Uncertainty measured by 95% CI. Results: During the study, 50 women were eligible for the study, and the mean age of the participants was 45.3 years. Of 50 patients who underwent surgery, 38 cases were considered benign based on IOTA USG rules, of which 35 were benign and 3 were malignant histologically. Eight cases were considered malignant based on IOTA USG rules, of which 6 were malignant and 2 were benign. Four cases were considered indeterminate, with two being benign and two being malignant histologically. If inconclusive cases are classified as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity are 75% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: USG is an easily available imaging tool that can be used as an initial modality in evaluating ovarian masses. IOTA simple ultrasound rules have diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian masses and help in management.","PeriodicalId":373466,"journal":{"name":"Health Technology Assessment in Action","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospita\",\"authors\":\"Amatul Kareem Sumaya, Banavath Swetha, Aithagani Ramachandraiah, Nadeem Ahmed, Sunitha Bajaj\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/htaa.v7i3.14211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) study technique is a specialized method for classifying and identifying adnexal growths. It employs 10 simple ultrasound directions to characterize masses as benign or malignant. Objectives: This study aims to provide pre-operative information to help gynecologists manage ovarian masses, avoiding delays in malignancy treatment and unnecessary surgery for benign lesions. Methods: This was a hospital-based observational study conducted in the radiology department on patients with clinical diagnoses of ovarian masses from August 2020 to March 2022 by prospective randomized sampling method. Patients with suspected ovarian pathology were evaluated using IOTA ultrasound rules and designated benign or malignant. The patients underwent a thorough history and clinical examination. Ultrasound was used to confirm the ovarian origin of the mass and differentiate it as benign or malignant. A transvaginal ultrasound was performed where necessary. Histopathological examination was the gold standard to confirm ultrasound and Doppler findings. Descriptive stats: Frequencies/percentages for categorical data, mean ± SD for normal, median with IQR for non-normal. Uncertainty measured by 95% CI. Results: During the study, 50 women were eligible for the study, and the mean age of the participants was 45.3 years. Of 50 patients who underwent surgery, 38 cases were considered benign based on IOTA USG rules, of which 35 were benign and 3 were malignant histologically. Eight cases were considered malignant based on IOTA USG rules, of which 6 were malignant and 2 were benign. Four cases were considered indeterminate, with two being benign and two being malignant histologically. If inconclusive cases are classified as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity are 75% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: USG is an easily available imaging tool that can be used as an initial modality in evaluating ovarian masses. IOTA simple ultrasound rules have diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian masses and help in management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Technology Assessment in Action\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Technology Assessment in Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v7i3.14211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Technology Assessment in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v7i3.14211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际卵巢肿瘤分析(IOTA)研究技术是一种对附件增生进行分类和鉴定的专门方法。它采用 10 个简单的超声波方向来确定肿块的良性或恶性。研究目的本研究旨在提供术前信息,帮助妇科医生处理卵巢肿块,避免延误恶性肿瘤治疗和对良性病变进行不必要的手术。 研究方法这是一项基于医院的观察性研究,采用前瞻性随机抽样方法,于2020年8月至2022年3月期间在放射科对临床诊断为卵巢肿块的患者进行观察。采用 IOTA 超声波规则对疑似卵巢病变患者进行评估,并确定良性或恶性。患者接受了全面的病史和临床检查。超声检查用于确认肿块的卵巢来源并区分良性或恶性。必要时进行经阴道超声检查。组织病理学检查是确认超声和多普勒检查结果的金标准。描述性统计分类数据为频率/百分比,正常数据为平均值±标准差,非正常数据为中位数和IQR。不确定性以 95% CI 表示。 结果研究期间,有 50 名女性符合研究条件,参与者的平均年龄为 45.3 岁。在接受手术的 50 名患者中,38 例根据 IOTA USG 规则被认为是良性,其中 35 例为良性,3 例为组织学恶性。根据 IOTA USG 规则,8 例被认为是恶性肿瘤,其中 6 例为恶性,2 例为良性。4 个病例被认为是不确定的,其中 2 个是良性,2 个是组织学上的恶性。如果将无法确定的病例归类为恶性,敏感性和特异性分别为 75% 和 88%。 结论USG 是一种易于使用的成像工具,可作为评估卵巢肿块的初始模式。IOTA 简易超声规则在区分良性和恶性卵巢肿块方面具有诊断准确性,有助于治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Observational Study on Evaluation of IOTA Ultrasound Simple Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Hospita
Background: The international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) study technique is a specialized method for classifying and identifying adnexal growths. It employs 10 simple ultrasound directions to characterize masses as benign or malignant. Objectives: This study aims to provide pre-operative information to help gynecologists manage ovarian masses, avoiding delays in malignancy treatment and unnecessary surgery for benign lesions. Methods: This was a hospital-based observational study conducted in the radiology department on patients with clinical diagnoses of ovarian masses from August 2020 to March 2022 by prospective randomized sampling method. Patients with suspected ovarian pathology were evaluated using IOTA ultrasound rules and designated benign or malignant. The patients underwent a thorough history and clinical examination. Ultrasound was used to confirm the ovarian origin of the mass and differentiate it as benign or malignant. A transvaginal ultrasound was performed where necessary. Histopathological examination was the gold standard to confirm ultrasound and Doppler findings. Descriptive stats: Frequencies/percentages for categorical data, mean ± SD for normal, median with IQR for non-normal. Uncertainty measured by 95% CI. Results: During the study, 50 women were eligible for the study, and the mean age of the participants was 45.3 years. Of 50 patients who underwent surgery, 38 cases were considered benign based on IOTA USG rules, of which 35 were benign and 3 were malignant histologically. Eight cases were considered malignant based on IOTA USG rules, of which 6 were malignant and 2 were benign. Four cases were considered indeterminate, with two being benign and two being malignant histologically. If inconclusive cases are classified as malignant, the sensitivity and specificity are 75% and 88%, respectively. Conclusions: USG is an easily available imaging tool that can be used as an initial modality in evaluating ovarian masses. IOTA simple ultrasound rules have diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian masses and help in management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信