探索收益管理:马来西亚可持续发展道路上的机构所有权和审计规模

Q3 Social Sciences
Salsiah Mohd Ali, M. Norhashim, N. Jaffar
{"title":"探索收益管理:马来西亚可持续发展道路上的机构所有权和审计规模","authors":"Salsiah Mohd Ali, M. Norhashim, N. Jaffar","doi":"10.18488/11.v12i4.3536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the relationships between discretionary accrual earnings management (DEM), real earnings management (REM), institutional ownership, and audit quality in Malaysian firms. The study's findings are expected to offer insights into how these factors may influence Malaysia's progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. We examine the relationship between DEM and REM to identify the potential simultaneous use of earnings management strategies. Additionally, we explore the impact of institutional ownership and audit firm size on a company's earnings management practices.  Using data from the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) spanning 2016-2018 we conducted statistical analyses, including ANOVA, t-tests, and multiple regression. There were notable correlations between DEM and REM, suggesting that these earnings management techniques are being used concurrently. Notably, institutional ownership and audit firm size played substantial roles in firms' earnings management practices. Companies with higher institutional ownership and larger audit firms tended to exhibit lower levels of DEM and REM. However, these factors did not appear to moderate the DEM-REM relationship.  These findings have critical implications for regulators and policymakers in addressing earnings management practices and enhancing corporate governance in Malaysia. Focusing on institutional ownership and audit firm size may help curtail such practices, contributing to Malaysia's progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Future research should explore other potential moderating variables and distinctive corporate governance features that could also impact the DEM-REM relationship.","PeriodicalId":36330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring earnings management: Institutional ownership and audit size in Malaysia’s sustainability pathway\",\"authors\":\"Salsiah Mohd Ali, M. Norhashim, N. Jaffar\",\"doi\":\"10.18488/11.v12i4.3536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to investigate the relationships between discretionary accrual earnings management (DEM), real earnings management (REM), institutional ownership, and audit quality in Malaysian firms. The study's findings are expected to offer insights into how these factors may influence Malaysia's progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. We examine the relationship between DEM and REM to identify the potential simultaneous use of earnings management strategies. Additionally, we explore the impact of institutional ownership and audit firm size on a company's earnings management practices.  Using data from the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) spanning 2016-2018 we conducted statistical analyses, including ANOVA, t-tests, and multiple regression. There were notable correlations between DEM and REM, suggesting that these earnings management techniques are being used concurrently. Notably, institutional ownership and audit firm size played substantial roles in firms' earnings management practices. Companies with higher institutional ownership and larger audit firms tended to exhibit lower levels of DEM and REM. However, these factors did not appear to moderate the DEM-REM relationship.  These findings have critical implications for regulators and policymakers in addressing earnings management practices and enhancing corporate governance in Malaysia. Focusing on institutional ownership and audit firm size may help curtail such practices, contributing to Malaysia's progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Future research should explore other potential moderating variables and distinctive corporate governance features that could also impact the DEM-REM relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management and Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18488/11.v12i4.3536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/11.v12i4.3536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查马来西亚公司的全权应计收益管理(DEM)、实际收益管理(REM)、机构所有权和审计质量之间的关系。研究结果有望为这些因素如何影响马来西亚在实现可持续发展目标方面取得进展提供启示。我们研究了 DEM 和 REM 之间的关系,以确定同时使用收益管理策略的可能性。此外,我们还探讨了机构所有权和审计公司规模对公司收益管理实践的影响。 利用吉隆坡证券交易所(KLSE)2016-2018 年的数据,我们进行了统计分析,包括方差分析、t 检验和多元回归。DEM和REM之间存在明显的相关性,表明这些盈利管理技术被同时使用。值得注意的是,机构所有权和审计公司规模在公司的收益管理实践中发挥了重要作用。机构所有权越高、审计公司规模越大的公司,其 DEM 和 REM 水平往往越低。然而,这些因素似乎并没有调节 DEM-REM 关系。 这些发现对马来西亚监管机构和政策制定者应对收益管理实践和加强公司治理具有重要意义。关注机构所有权和审计公司规模可能有助于遏制此类做法,从而推动马来西亚在实现可持续发展目标方面取得进展。未来的研究应探索其他可能影响 DEM-REM 关系的潜在调节变量和独特的公司治理特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring earnings management: Institutional ownership and audit size in Malaysia’s sustainability pathway
This study aims to investigate the relationships between discretionary accrual earnings management (DEM), real earnings management (REM), institutional ownership, and audit quality in Malaysian firms. The study's findings are expected to offer insights into how these factors may influence Malaysia's progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. We examine the relationship between DEM and REM to identify the potential simultaneous use of earnings management strategies. Additionally, we explore the impact of institutional ownership and audit firm size on a company's earnings management practices.  Using data from the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) spanning 2016-2018 we conducted statistical analyses, including ANOVA, t-tests, and multiple regression. There were notable correlations between DEM and REM, suggesting that these earnings management techniques are being used concurrently. Notably, institutional ownership and audit firm size played substantial roles in firms' earnings management practices. Companies with higher institutional ownership and larger audit firms tended to exhibit lower levels of DEM and REM. However, these factors did not appear to moderate the DEM-REM relationship.  These findings have critical implications for regulators and policymakers in addressing earnings management practices and enhancing corporate governance in Malaysia. Focusing on institutional ownership and audit firm size may help curtail such practices, contributing to Malaysia's progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Future research should explore other potential moderating variables and distinctive corporate governance features that could also impact the DEM-REM relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Management and Sustainability
International Journal of Management and Sustainability Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信