Eileen Wong, Shirley Visperas, So Yung Choi, Mahealani Suapaia
{"title":"组织灌注和布莱登量表作为重症监护病房患者压力损伤风险的预测指标","authors":"Eileen Wong, Shirley Visperas, So Yung Choi, Mahealani Suapaia","doi":"10.17479/jacs.2023.13.3.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The national rate of pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) 2016-2018 was 5.97%, while at one hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii it averaged 13%. The Braden scale is the gold standard PI risk assessment tool. Researchers have reported the Braden scale has limited value in the ICU setting and consider tissue perfusion to be the better indicator. The aim was to determine if tissue perfusion, as measured by noninvasive transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels, was a predictor of PI risk development.Methods: Electronic medical records of 161 patients admitted from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Bivariate associations with the development of PI were examined using Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the continuous variables. A multivariable logistic model was fitted for the development of PI with adjustments for potential confounders.Results: Of 161 patients, 125 met the inclusion criteria. Length of stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of vasopressors, and the Braden score were statistically significant predictors of PI risk development; tissue perfusion was not significant.Conclusion: ICU patients have a higher mortality and severity of illness. The Braden score guides implementation of PI preventative measures. The relationship between tissue perfusion and PI development may warrant further research. A broader clinical picture to incorporate the Braden scale and other risk factors in PI development such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and use of vasopressors should be considered.","PeriodicalId":34662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue Perfusion and the Braden Scale as Predictors of Pressure Injury Risk in the Intensive Care Unit Patient\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Wong, Shirley Visperas, So Yung Choi, Mahealani Suapaia\",\"doi\":\"10.17479/jacs.2023.13.3.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The national rate of pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) 2016-2018 was 5.97%, while at one hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii it averaged 13%. The Braden scale is the gold standard PI risk assessment tool. Researchers have reported the Braden scale has limited value in the ICU setting and consider tissue perfusion to be the better indicator. The aim was to determine if tissue perfusion, as measured by noninvasive transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels, was a predictor of PI risk development.Methods: Electronic medical records of 161 patients admitted from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Bivariate associations with the development of PI were examined using Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the continuous variables. A multivariable logistic model was fitted for the development of PI with adjustments for potential confounders.Results: Of 161 patients, 125 met the inclusion criteria. Length of stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of vasopressors, and the Braden score were statistically significant predictors of PI risk development; tissue perfusion was not significant.Conclusion: ICU patients have a higher mortality and severity of illness. The Braden score guides implementation of PI preventative measures. The relationship between tissue perfusion and PI development may warrant further research. A broader clinical picture to incorporate the Braden scale and other risk factors in PI development such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and use of vasopressors should be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2023.13.3.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17479/jacs.2023.13.3.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:2016-2018年全国重症监护室(ICU)压伤(PI)发生率为5.97%,而夏威夷檀香山一家医院的平均发生率为13%。布莱登量表是压伤风险评估的金标准工具。研究人员报告称,布莱登量表在重症监护室环境中价值有限,组织灌注被认为是更好的指标。该研究旨在确定通过无创经皮组织氧含量测量的组织灌注是否能预测 PI 风险的发展:回顾性审查了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日收治的 161 名患者的电子病历。采用描述性统计方法总结了患者的特征。对分类变量采用费雪精确检验,对连续变量采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,检验与 PI 发展的二元关联。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,针对 PI 的发展情况拟合了一个多变量逻辑模型:在 161 名患者中,125 人符合纳入标准。住院时间、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分、血管加压剂的使用以及布莱登评分在统计学上对 PI 风险的发生有显著的预测作用;组织灌注无显著影响:结论:重症监护病房患者的死亡率和病情严重程度都较高。结论:重症监护病房患者的死亡率和病情严重程度都较高,布莱登评分可为实施肺结核预防措施提供指导。组织灌注与 PI 发生之间的关系值得进一步研究。应考虑将 Braden 评分和 PI 发生的其他风险因素(如急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分以及血管加压药的使用)纳入更广泛的临床研究。
Tissue Perfusion and the Braden Scale as Predictors of Pressure Injury Risk in the Intensive Care Unit Patient
Purpose: The national rate of pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) 2016-2018 was 5.97%, while at one hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii it averaged 13%. The Braden scale is the gold standard PI risk assessment tool. Researchers have reported the Braden scale has limited value in the ICU setting and consider tissue perfusion to be the better indicator. The aim was to determine if tissue perfusion, as measured by noninvasive transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels, was a predictor of PI risk development.Methods: Electronic medical records of 161 patients admitted from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Bivariate associations with the development of PI were examined using Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the continuous variables. A multivariable logistic model was fitted for the development of PI with adjustments for potential confounders.Results: Of 161 patients, 125 met the inclusion criteria. Length of stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, use of vasopressors, and the Braden score were statistically significant predictors of PI risk development; tissue perfusion was not significant.Conclusion: ICU patients have a higher mortality and severity of illness. The Braden score guides implementation of PI preventative measures. The relationship between tissue perfusion and PI development may warrant further research. A broader clinical picture to incorporate the Braden scale and other risk factors in PI development such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and use of vasopressors should be considered.