{"title":"韩国第一篇关于集合建筑法理论的文章:Chong Kil Tsche 教授 1970 年 3 月的论文","authors":"Joon-Hyong Lee","doi":"10.55029/kabl.2023.48.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first Korean article on aggregate building law theory is Chong Kil Tsche’s paper published in Seoul Law Journal vol. 11 no. 2 in March 1970, under the title of “Rechtsvergleichende und rechtserkennende Studie über das Wohnungsrecht(in English: Comparative and survey-based study of aggregate housing law, hereafter ‘the Paper’).” Though Professor Tsche had left only this one paper on the theme before he passed away at the age of 42 in 1973, the Paper is awarded meaning much more than as the first Korean article in this area of law. To begin with, it is worth noting that despite being the first one, the Paper was mentioned in a widely cited German standard commentary, thereby introducing abroad the emerging field of law in Korea. Such an example is rare to find in other legal fields, which could be partly explained in the light of the author’s vivid international exchange activities. However, the true value of the Paper should be found in its significant academic worth in and of itself. Firstly, it analyzed how Stockwerkseigentum, once denied by Pandectists in the tradition of Roman law, was revived as sectional ownership form of modern housing in Germany, France, and Japan due to social demand, skillfully using a comparative legal method. The results of the analysis are extraordinarily accurate and suggestive even by today's standards, more than 50 years later. Secondly, the paper scrutinized the legal situations concerning multi-family housing, which just began to take root in our society in the late 1960s, based on the actual documents of contracts. It summarizes how the legal problems caused by the absence or lack of related laws were resolved on-site, concluding that the final and desirable resolution should be possible through the enactment of overall systematic legislation. Given our terribly deficient research resources in the late 1960s, the achievements of the Paper without any prior research is remarkably exceptional and admirable. To understand how all these were accomplished, each reference cited in the section on legal history in the Paper is meticulously searched for and compared with the original text. And it could be confirmed that the lack of European literature was supplemented with Japanese literature, and plausibly supposed that Professor Tsche might have at least partially consult the original directly. Inspired by the Paper, a series of papers addressing the legal issues regarding aggregate buildings were published not only in practice but also at universities from the mid-1970s to the early 1980s. And the Aggregate Building Act in 1984 was finally enacted in Korea with the full support of the Korean Civil Law Society and the courts. By the way, several key issues raised in the Paper - such as the relationship between shared ownership and exclusive ownership of common areas, as well as the time and conditions for the establishment of sectional ownership - are expected to continue to be discussed in the near future.","PeriodicalId":399431,"journal":{"name":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","volume":"396 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The First Korean Article on Aggregate Building Law Theory: Professor Chong Kil Tsche’s March 1970 Paper\",\"authors\":\"Joon-Hyong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.55029/kabl.2023.48.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first Korean article on aggregate building law theory is Chong Kil Tsche’s paper published in Seoul Law Journal vol. 11 no. 2 in March 1970, under the title of “Rechtsvergleichende und rechtserkennende Studie über das Wohnungsrecht(in English: Comparative and survey-based study of aggregate housing law, hereafter ‘the Paper’).” Though Professor Tsche had left only this one paper on the theme before he passed away at the age of 42 in 1973, the Paper is awarded meaning much more than as the first Korean article in this area of law. To begin with, it is worth noting that despite being the first one, the Paper was mentioned in a widely cited German standard commentary, thereby introducing abroad the emerging field of law in Korea. Such an example is rare to find in other legal fields, which could be partly explained in the light of the author’s vivid international exchange activities. However, the true value of the Paper should be found in its significant academic worth in and of itself. Firstly, it analyzed how Stockwerkseigentum, once denied by Pandectists in the tradition of Roman law, was revived as sectional ownership form of modern housing in Germany, France, and Japan due to social demand, skillfully using a comparative legal method. The results of the analysis are extraordinarily accurate and suggestive even by today's standards, more than 50 years later. Secondly, the paper scrutinized the legal situations concerning multi-family housing, which just began to take root in our society in the late 1960s, based on the actual documents of contracts. It summarizes how the legal problems caused by the absence or lack of related laws were resolved on-site, concluding that the final and desirable resolution should be possible through the enactment of overall systematic legislation. Given our terribly deficient research resources in the late 1960s, the achievements of the Paper without any prior research is remarkably exceptional and admirable. To understand how all these were accomplished, each reference cited in the section on legal history in the Paper is meticulously searched for and compared with the original text. And it could be confirmed that the lack of European literature was supplemented with Japanese literature, and plausibly supposed that Professor Tsche might have at least partially consult the original directly. Inspired by the Paper, a series of papers addressing the legal issues regarding aggregate buildings were published not only in practice but also at universities from the mid-1970s to the early 1980s. And the Aggregate Building Act in 1984 was finally enacted in Korea with the full support of the Korean Civil Law Society and the courts. By the way, several key issues raised in the Paper - such as the relationship between shared ownership and exclusive ownership of common areas, as well as the time and conditions for the establishment of sectional ownership - are expected to continue to be discussed in the near future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law\",\"volume\":\"396 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2023.48.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2023.48.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
韩国第一篇关于综合建筑法理论的文章是 Chong Kil Tsche 于 1970 年 3 月发表在《首尔法律杂志》第 11 卷第 2 期上的论文,标题为 "Rechtsvergleichende und rechtserkennende Studie über das Wohnungsrecht(英文:Rechtsvergleichende und rechtserkennende Studie über das Wohnungsrecht,以下简称'论文')":关于综合住房法的比较和调查研究,以下简称'论文')"。尽管在 1973 年 42 岁去世之前,Tsche 教授只留下了这一篇关于这一主题的论文,但《论文》的意义远不止是韩国在这一法律领域的第一篇文章。 首先,值得注意的是,尽管是第一篇论文,但该论文在一篇被广泛引用的德国标准评论中被提及,从而向国外介绍了韩国新兴的法律领域。这样的例子在其他法律领域并不多见,这在一定程度上可以从作者生动的国际交流活动中得到解释。 然而,该论文的真正价值应在于其本身的重要学术价值。首先,该文巧妙地运用比较法的方法,分析了曾被罗马法传统中的潘德克吞主义者所否定的Stockwerkseigentum是如何在德国、法国和日本因社会需求而作为现代住房的分段所有权形式得以复兴的。即使以 50 多年后的今天的标准来衡量,分析结果也是异常准确和具有启发性的。其次,论文根据实际的合同文件,仔细研究了 20 世纪 60 年代末刚刚开始在我国社会扎根的多户住宅的法律状况。论文总结了相关法律的缺失或空白所导致的法律问题是如何在现场解决的,并得出结论:通过制定整体的系统性立法,才有可能最终得到理想的解决。 在 20 世纪 60 年代末我们的研究资源极其匮乏的情况下,该文件在没有任何前期研究的情况下取得的成就是非常特殊和令人钦佩的。为了了解这些成就是如何取得的,我们对论文中法律史部分所引用的每一个参考文献都进行了细致的检索,并与原文进行了比较。可以确认的是,在缺乏欧洲文献的情况下,我们用日本文献进行了补充,并且似是而非地推测,Tsche 教授可能至少直接参考了部分原文。 受该论文的启发,从 20 世纪 70 年代中期到 80 年代初期,不仅在实践中,而且在大学里也发表了一系列探讨骨料建筑法律问题的论文。1984 年,在韩国民法协会和法院的全力支持下,韩国终于颁布了《集料建筑法》。顺便提一下,该文件中提出的几个关键问题--如共有产权和公用区域专有产权之间的关系,以及分段产权成立的时间和条件--预计在不久的将来还会继续讨论。
The First Korean Article on Aggregate Building Law Theory: Professor Chong Kil Tsche’s March 1970 Paper
The first Korean article on aggregate building law theory is Chong Kil Tsche’s paper published in Seoul Law Journal vol. 11 no. 2 in March 1970, under the title of “Rechtsvergleichende und rechtserkennende Studie über das Wohnungsrecht(in English: Comparative and survey-based study of aggregate housing law, hereafter ‘the Paper’).” Though Professor Tsche had left only this one paper on the theme before he passed away at the age of 42 in 1973, the Paper is awarded meaning much more than as the first Korean article in this area of law. To begin with, it is worth noting that despite being the first one, the Paper was mentioned in a widely cited German standard commentary, thereby introducing abroad the emerging field of law in Korea. Such an example is rare to find in other legal fields, which could be partly explained in the light of the author’s vivid international exchange activities. However, the true value of the Paper should be found in its significant academic worth in and of itself. Firstly, it analyzed how Stockwerkseigentum, once denied by Pandectists in the tradition of Roman law, was revived as sectional ownership form of modern housing in Germany, France, and Japan due to social demand, skillfully using a comparative legal method. The results of the analysis are extraordinarily accurate and suggestive even by today's standards, more than 50 years later. Secondly, the paper scrutinized the legal situations concerning multi-family housing, which just began to take root in our society in the late 1960s, based on the actual documents of contracts. It summarizes how the legal problems caused by the absence or lack of related laws were resolved on-site, concluding that the final and desirable resolution should be possible through the enactment of overall systematic legislation. Given our terribly deficient research resources in the late 1960s, the achievements of the Paper without any prior research is remarkably exceptional and admirable. To understand how all these were accomplished, each reference cited in the section on legal history in the Paper is meticulously searched for and compared with the original text. And it could be confirmed that the lack of European literature was supplemented with Japanese literature, and plausibly supposed that Professor Tsche might have at least partially consult the original directly. Inspired by the Paper, a series of papers addressing the legal issues regarding aggregate buildings were published not only in practice but also at universities from the mid-1970s to the early 1980s. And the Aggregate Building Act in 1984 was finally enacted in Korea with the full support of the Korean Civil Law Society and the courts. By the way, several key issues raised in the Paper - such as the relationship between shared ownership and exclusive ownership of common areas, as well as the time and conditions for the establishment of sectional ownership - are expected to continue to be discussed in the near future.