塞内加尔达喀尔一家三级医院 2019 年至 2020 年期间分离出的耐多药肠道菌的流行率

Farma Thiam, Abdoulaye Diop, B. Ndiaye, Ndeye Maguette Bèye, Issa Ndiaye, Ousmane Sow, Magatte Ndiaye, T. Diallo, Abdoulaye Seck
{"title":"塞内加尔达喀尔一家三级医院 2019 年至 2020 年期间分离出的耐多药肠道菌的流行率","authors":"Farma Thiam, Abdoulaye Diop, B. Ndiaye, Ndeye Maguette Bèye, Issa Ndiaye, Ousmane Sow, Magatte Ndiaye, T. Diallo, Abdoulaye Seck","doi":"10.9734/mrji/2023/v33i101406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multi-resistant bacteria have emerged as a global threat to human health. In Africa, there are few data on AMR. The objective of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance profile of enterobacteria strains and prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated in a university hospital in the suburbs of Dakar. Methods: Enterobacterales were isolated from a wide range of clinical specimens (urine, pus, blood, catheter tip and bronchoalveolar fluid) from inpatients and outpatients at Medical Biology Laboratory of National University Hospital Center of Pikine from November 2019 to October 2020. Enterobacterales were identified using API 20E. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with ATB G-EU (08) (bio Mérieuxs®) on all enterobacterales in accordance with CA-SFM/EUCAST 2020 guidelines. Results: Of the 3422 different clinical specimens tested, 623 (17.1%) were culture positive. Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 57.6% (n=359) of the strains; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were predominant isolates with 53.5% and 20.6% respectively. Seventy-four(%) strains of enterobacterales were ESBL. Antibiotic resistance patterns showed a prevalence of multidrug resistant strains of 32.6%. The most active antibiotics on isolates were imipenem (25%), followed by amikacin (15%), fosfomycin (12%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (10%). Conclusion: High rates of ESBL and multidrug-resistant strains were found in both outpatients and inpatients. These results indicate need for an active surveillance system for antimicrobial resistance. Also, the application of good hospital hygiene practices and antibiotic therapy adapted to local data must be adopted.","PeriodicalId":18450,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology Research Journal International","volume":"434 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from 2019 to 2020 in a Tertiary Hospital in Dakar-Senegal\",\"authors\":\"Farma Thiam, Abdoulaye Diop, B. Ndiaye, Ndeye Maguette Bèye, Issa Ndiaye, Ousmane Sow, Magatte Ndiaye, T. Diallo, Abdoulaye Seck\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/mrji/2023/v33i101406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Multi-resistant bacteria have emerged as a global threat to human health. In Africa, there are few data on AMR. The objective of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance profile of enterobacteria strains and prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated in a university hospital in the suburbs of Dakar. Methods: Enterobacterales were isolated from a wide range of clinical specimens (urine, pus, blood, catheter tip and bronchoalveolar fluid) from inpatients and outpatients at Medical Biology Laboratory of National University Hospital Center of Pikine from November 2019 to October 2020. Enterobacterales were identified using API 20E. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with ATB G-EU (08) (bio Mérieuxs®) on all enterobacterales in accordance with CA-SFM/EUCAST 2020 guidelines. Results: Of the 3422 different clinical specimens tested, 623 (17.1%) were culture positive. Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 57.6% (n=359) of the strains; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were predominant isolates with 53.5% and 20.6% respectively. Seventy-four(%) strains of enterobacterales were ESBL. Antibiotic resistance patterns showed a prevalence of multidrug resistant strains of 32.6%. The most active antibiotics on isolates were imipenem (25%), followed by amikacin (15%), fosfomycin (12%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (10%). Conclusion: High rates of ESBL and multidrug-resistant strains were found in both outpatients and inpatients. These results indicate need for an active surveillance system for antimicrobial resistance. Also, the application of good hospital hygiene practices and antibiotic therapy adapted to local data must be adopted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology Research Journal International\",\"volume\":\"434 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology Research Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/mrji/2023/v33i101406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology Research Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/mrji/2023/v33i101406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多重耐药细菌已成为人类健康的全球性威胁。在非洲,有关 AMR 的数据很少。本研究旨在确定达喀尔郊区一所大学医院中分离出的肠杆菌菌株的抗生素耐药性概况和多重耐药菌的流行率。 研究方法:从2019年11月至2020年10月,在皮金国立大学医院中心医学生物学实验室从住院和门诊患者的各种临床标本(尿液、脓液、血液、导管尖端和支气管肺泡液)中分离出肠杆菌。使用 API 20E 鉴定肠杆菌。根据 CA-SFM/EUCAST 2020 指南,使用 ATB G-EU (08) (bio Mérieuxs®) 对所有肠杆菌进行抗菌药敏感性检测。 结果:在检测的 3422 份不同临床标本中,有 623 份(17.1%)培养呈阳性。肠杆菌科细菌占菌株总数的 57.6%(n=359);大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是主要分离菌株,分别占 53.5%和 20.6%。74%的肠杆菌属菌株具有 ESBL。抗生素耐药性模式显示,耐多药菌株的流行率为 32.6%。对分离菌株最有效的抗生素是亚胺培南(25%),其次是阿米卡星(15%)、磷霉素(12%)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(10%)。 结论在门诊和住院患者中均发现了高比例的ESBL和耐多药菌株。这些结果表明,有必要建立积极的抗菌药耐药性监测系统。此外,还必须根据当地数据采用良好的医院卫生规范和抗生素疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolated from 2019 to 2020 in a Tertiary Hospital in Dakar-Senegal
Background: Multi-resistant bacteria have emerged as a global threat to human health. In Africa, there are few data on AMR. The objective of this study was to determine antibiotic resistance profile of enterobacteria strains and prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated in a university hospital in the suburbs of Dakar. Methods: Enterobacterales were isolated from a wide range of clinical specimens (urine, pus, blood, catheter tip and bronchoalveolar fluid) from inpatients and outpatients at Medical Biology Laboratory of National University Hospital Center of Pikine from November 2019 to October 2020. Enterobacterales were identified using API 20E. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with ATB G-EU (08) (bio Mérieuxs®) on all enterobacterales in accordance with CA-SFM/EUCAST 2020 guidelines. Results: Of the 3422 different clinical specimens tested, 623 (17.1%) were culture positive. Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 57.6% (n=359) of the strains; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were predominant isolates with 53.5% and 20.6% respectively. Seventy-four(%) strains of enterobacterales were ESBL. Antibiotic resistance patterns showed a prevalence of multidrug resistant strains of 32.6%. The most active antibiotics on isolates were imipenem (25%), followed by amikacin (15%), fosfomycin (12%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (10%). Conclusion: High rates of ESBL and multidrug-resistant strains were found in both outpatients and inpatients. These results indicate need for an active surveillance system for antimicrobial resistance. Also, the application of good hospital hygiene practices and antibiotic therapy adapted to local data must be adopted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信