{"title":"缺失的山脊之谜:图阿莫图高原共轭和秘鲁平板的新模型","authors":"Michael Fletcher, Derek Wyman","doi":"10.1130/ges02679.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a new tectonic plate reconstruction that suggests substantial revisions to events associated with development of the Peruvian flat slab and resolves several long-standing issues regarding the subduction of bathymetric highs in the region. The Tuamotu Plateau is widely considered to be the product of Easter Plume magmatism, and plate reconstructions suggest it formed following initial plume ascent at ca. 55 Ma. The Nazca Ridge is also linked to the Easter Plume and is an obvious candidate to be the spreading ridge conjugate to the Tuamotu Plateau. Models for the paired evolution of the two ridges, however, generally stop at ca. 33 Ma because of the inability of plate reconstructions to associate the two ridges across a spreading center prior to this time. In addition, seafloor magnetic data demonstrate that the Tuamotu Plateau developed at a complexly shaped and evolving mid-oceanic ridge that precluded development of a simple mirror image conjugate of the type commonly employed in Nazca Ridge reconstructions. Seafloor isochrons also suggest that a ridge jump separated the Tuamotu Plateau from its conjugate at ca. 42 Ma. Global plate models offer an alternative approach to assessing conjugate development, by showing how a hypothetical conjugate to the Tuamotu Plateau is built up over time. Using such a model, we found that the conjugate that developed during the main stage of Tuamotu growth (55 Ma to 42 Ma) cannot be the Nazca Ridge, which appears to have initiated at ca. 42 Ma, when the Easter Plume diverted volcanism southward. We named the newly recognized conjugate the Enigma Ridge. Importantly, subduction of this ridge starting from ca. 17 Ma on the north Peruvian trench can account for the missing slab buoyancy previously attributed to the hypothesized, but controversial, Inca Plateau. The Enigma Ridge must still be providing far more buoyancy over a much greater area than the Nazca Ridge, which only began to subduct rather recently.","PeriodicalId":507979,"journal":{"name":"Geosphere","volume":"395 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The missing ridge Enigma: A new model for the Tuamotu Plateau conjugate and Peruvian flat slab\",\"authors\":\"Michael Fletcher, Derek Wyman\",\"doi\":\"10.1130/ges02679.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a new tectonic plate reconstruction that suggests substantial revisions to events associated with development of the Peruvian flat slab and resolves several long-standing issues regarding the subduction of bathymetric highs in the region. The Tuamotu Plateau is widely considered to be the product of Easter Plume magmatism, and plate reconstructions suggest it formed following initial plume ascent at ca. 55 Ma. The Nazca Ridge is also linked to the Easter Plume and is an obvious candidate to be the spreading ridge conjugate to the Tuamotu Plateau. Models for the paired evolution of the two ridges, however, generally stop at ca. 33 Ma because of the inability of plate reconstructions to associate the two ridges across a spreading center prior to this time. In addition, seafloor magnetic data demonstrate that the Tuamotu Plateau developed at a complexly shaped and evolving mid-oceanic ridge that precluded development of a simple mirror image conjugate of the type commonly employed in Nazca Ridge reconstructions. Seafloor isochrons also suggest that a ridge jump separated the Tuamotu Plateau from its conjugate at ca. 42 Ma. Global plate models offer an alternative approach to assessing conjugate development, by showing how a hypothetical conjugate to the Tuamotu Plateau is built up over time. Using such a model, we found that the conjugate that developed during the main stage of Tuamotu growth (55 Ma to 42 Ma) cannot be the Nazca Ridge, which appears to have initiated at ca. 42 Ma, when the Easter Plume diverted volcanism southward. We named the newly recognized conjugate the Enigma Ridge. Importantly, subduction of this ridge starting from ca. 17 Ma on the north Peruvian trench can account for the missing slab buoyancy previously attributed to the hypothesized, but controversial, Inca Plateau. The Enigma Ridge must still be providing far more buoyancy over a much greater area than the Nazca Ridge, which only began to subduct rather recently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosphere\",\"volume\":\"395 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02679.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02679.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们提出了一个新的构造板块重建方案,该方案建议对与秘鲁平板发展相关的事件进行重大修正,并解决了有关该地区水深高地俯冲的几个长期存在的问题。人们普遍认为图阿莫图高原是复活节羽流岩浆作用的产物,板块重建表明它是在大约 55 Ma 的初始羽流上升之后形成的。55 Ma.纳斯卡海脊也与复活节羽流有关,显然是与图阿莫图高原共轭的扩张海脊。然而,这两个海脊成对演化的模型一般在约 33 Ma 时停止,因为板块无法在约 33 Ma 时形成。33 Ma,因为在此之前的板块重建无法将两个海脊与扩张中心联系起来。此外,海底磁场数据表明,图阿莫图高原是在一个形状复杂、不断演变的大洋中脊上发展起来的,这就排除了纳斯卡海脊重建中通常采用的简单镜像共轭类型的发展。海底等时线也表明,在大约 42 Ma 时,海脊跃升将图阿莫图高原与其共轭体分开。42 Ma。全球板块模型为评估共轭发展提供了另一种方法,它展示了图阿莫图高原的假定共轭是如何随着时间的推移而建立起来的。利用这种模型,我们发现在图阿莫图生长的主要阶段(55 Ma 到 42 Ma)发展起来的共轭体不可能是纳斯卡海脊,因为纳斯卡海脊似乎是在大约 42 Ma 时开始形成的,当时复活节海盆正在形成。纳斯卡海脊似乎是在大约 42 Ma 时开始形成的,当时复活节羽流使火山活动向南转移。我们将新发现的共轭脊命名为 "谜脊"。重要的是,该海脊从大约 17 Ma 开始在秘鲁北部海沟俯冲,这可以解释之前被认为是印加高原的假说但有争议的板块浮力的缺失。与纳斯卡海脊相比,英格玛海脊必须在更大的范围内提供更多的浮力,而纳斯卡海脊直到最近才开始俯冲。
The missing ridge Enigma: A new model for the Tuamotu Plateau conjugate and Peruvian flat slab
We present a new tectonic plate reconstruction that suggests substantial revisions to events associated with development of the Peruvian flat slab and resolves several long-standing issues regarding the subduction of bathymetric highs in the region. The Tuamotu Plateau is widely considered to be the product of Easter Plume magmatism, and plate reconstructions suggest it formed following initial plume ascent at ca. 55 Ma. The Nazca Ridge is also linked to the Easter Plume and is an obvious candidate to be the spreading ridge conjugate to the Tuamotu Plateau. Models for the paired evolution of the two ridges, however, generally stop at ca. 33 Ma because of the inability of plate reconstructions to associate the two ridges across a spreading center prior to this time. In addition, seafloor magnetic data demonstrate that the Tuamotu Plateau developed at a complexly shaped and evolving mid-oceanic ridge that precluded development of a simple mirror image conjugate of the type commonly employed in Nazca Ridge reconstructions. Seafloor isochrons also suggest that a ridge jump separated the Tuamotu Plateau from its conjugate at ca. 42 Ma. Global plate models offer an alternative approach to assessing conjugate development, by showing how a hypothetical conjugate to the Tuamotu Plateau is built up over time. Using such a model, we found that the conjugate that developed during the main stage of Tuamotu growth (55 Ma to 42 Ma) cannot be the Nazca Ridge, which appears to have initiated at ca. 42 Ma, when the Easter Plume diverted volcanism southward. We named the newly recognized conjugate the Enigma Ridge. Importantly, subduction of this ridge starting from ca. 17 Ma on the north Peruvian trench can account for the missing slab buoyancy previously attributed to the hypothesized, but controversial, Inca Plateau. The Enigma Ridge must still be providing far more buoyancy over a much greater area than the Nazca Ridge, which only began to subduct rather recently.