{"title":"CIP 领导理念、国内外研究分析及未来研究目标探讨","authors":"Han Yong Jung, Ki Seok Jeon","doi":"10.22243/tklq.2023.14.4.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the domestic research trends on the CIP leadership model, explain the concept, and to suggest future research directions. The starting point of the CIP leadership model is a study by Mumford & Van Doorn (2001) on the American historical leader, politician Benjamin Franklin. Mumford (2006) then compared the pathways to outstanding leadership on several important dimensions, and then classified them into three: ‘charismatic leaders’, ‘ideological leaders’, and ‘pragmatic leaders’. Mumford presented the results of classifying 120 historically prominent leaders into six types (20 each), such as [charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders] × [socialized and individualized orientation], using an historiometry method. After the CIP model was introduced to the academic field, research papers are continuously being published in famous overseas journals. However, there are only four papers related to the CIP leadership model in Korea so far, and none of the four papers deal with the CIP model in detail. We look at domestic research trends, introduce the CIP leadership model in detail, and suggest the limitations of the model and future research directions. Through this, it is hoped that the interest of Korea leadership researchers in the CIP leadership model can be enhanced and the leadership research method can be expanded.","PeriodicalId":312865,"journal":{"name":"Korean Academy Of Leadership","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CIP Leadership Concept, Analysis on Domestic and Overseas Research a nd E xploring F uture Research Objectives\",\"authors\":\"Han Yong Jung, Ki Seok Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.22243/tklq.2023.14.4.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to examine the domestic research trends on the CIP leadership model, explain the concept, and to suggest future research directions. The starting point of the CIP leadership model is a study by Mumford & Van Doorn (2001) on the American historical leader, politician Benjamin Franklin. Mumford (2006) then compared the pathways to outstanding leadership on several important dimensions, and then classified them into three: ‘charismatic leaders’, ‘ideological leaders’, and ‘pragmatic leaders’. Mumford presented the results of classifying 120 historically prominent leaders into six types (20 each), such as [charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders] × [socialized and individualized orientation], using an historiometry method. After the CIP model was introduced to the academic field, research papers are continuously being published in famous overseas journals. However, there are only four papers related to the CIP leadership model in Korea so far, and none of the four papers deal with the CIP model in detail. We look at domestic research trends, introduce the CIP leadership model in detail, and suggest the limitations of the model and future research directions. Through this, it is hoped that the interest of Korea leadership researchers in the CIP leadership model can be enhanced and the leadership research method can be expanded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Academy Of Leadership\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Academy Of Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22243/tklq.2023.14.4.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Academy Of Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22243/tklq.2023.14.4.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CIP Leadership Concept, Analysis on Domestic and Overseas Research a nd E xploring F uture Research Objectives
The purpose of this study is to examine the domestic research trends on the CIP leadership model, explain the concept, and to suggest future research directions. The starting point of the CIP leadership model is a study by Mumford & Van Doorn (2001) on the American historical leader, politician Benjamin Franklin. Mumford (2006) then compared the pathways to outstanding leadership on several important dimensions, and then classified them into three: ‘charismatic leaders’, ‘ideological leaders’, and ‘pragmatic leaders’. Mumford presented the results of classifying 120 historically prominent leaders into six types (20 each), such as [charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders] × [socialized and individualized orientation], using an historiometry method. After the CIP model was introduced to the academic field, research papers are continuously being published in famous overseas journals. However, there are only four papers related to the CIP leadership model in Korea so far, and none of the four papers deal with the CIP model in detail. We look at domestic research trends, introduce the CIP leadership model in detail, and suggest the limitations of the model and future research directions. Through this, it is hoped that the interest of Korea leadership researchers in the CIP leadership model can be enhanced and the leadership research method can be expanded.