离婚时彩票捐款的财产分割:离婚时非婚姻财产的公平分割

Jonghee Seo
{"title":"离婚时彩票捐款的财产分割:离婚时非婚姻财产的公平分割","authors":"Jonghee Seo","doi":"10.31998/ksfl.2023.37.3.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. has a fair division of marital property (community property), while the U.K. has a basically equal division. In particular, the United Kingdom does not recognize the division of non-matrimonial property, but in exceptional cases, non-matrimonial property may be considered as marital property and divided, but the division is based on equity, not equal division. Thus, sharing and needs principles are considered together. Our jurisprudence generally does not consider non-matrimonial property to be subject to division, but recognizes it in special circumstances. In other words, our jurisprudence holds that special property is subject to division even if it belongs to one of the spouses, if the other party has actively cooperated in its maintenance, prevented its deterioration or contributed to its increase. While this may be a good choice for the specific justification of protecting the other spouse, it goes beyond the function of property division, and clearly our civil law is based on a separate property system, and the easy inclusion of personal property as property subject to division would undermine the separate property system. Put it in a nutshell, only in cases where the contribution to the formation of wealth is effectively wiped out, which can be assessed as significantly contrary to socially accepted equity, should non-matrimonial property be considered for division.","PeriodicalId":315796,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society Of Family Law","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property Division of Lottery Contributions in Divorce: Equitable Division of Non-matrimonial Property in Divorce\",\"authors\":\"Jonghee Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.31998/ksfl.2023.37.3.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The U.S. has a fair division of marital property (community property), while the U.K. has a basically equal division. In particular, the United Kingdom does not recognize the division of non-matrimonial property, but in exceptional cases, non-matrimonial property may be considered as marital property and divided, but the division is based on equity, not equal division. Thus, sharing and needs principles are considered together. Our jurisprudence generally does not consider non-matrimonial property to be subject to division, but recognizes it in special circumstances. In other words, our jurisprudence holds that special property is subject to division even if it belongs to one of the spouses, if the other party has actively cooperated in its maintenance, prevented its deterioration or contributed to its increase. While this may be a good choice for the specific justification of protecting the other spouse, it goes beyond the function of property division, and clearly our civil law is based on a separate property system, and the easy inclusion of personal property as property subject to division would undermine the separate property system. Put it in a nutshell, only in cases where the contribution to the formation of wealth is effectively wiped out, which can be assessed as significantly contrary to socially accepted equity, should non-matrimonial property be considered for division.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Society Of Family Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Society Of Family Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31998/ksfl.2023.37.3.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society Of Family Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31998/ksfl.2023.37.3.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国对婚姻财产(夫妻共同财产)进行公平分割,而英国则基本上是平等分割。特别是,英国不承认非婚姻财产的分割,但在特殊情况下,非婚姻财产可被视为婚姻财产并进行分割,但分割的基础是公平,而不是平均分割。因此,分享原则和需求原则要一并考虑。 我国法学界一般不认为非婚姻财产可以分割,但在特殊情况下予以承认。换句话说,我国法学界认为,如果另一方积极配合维护、防止其恶化或促成其增加,那么即使属于配偶一方的特殊财产也应进行分割。 从保护配偶另一方的特定理由来看,这或许是一个不错的选择,但它却超出了财产分割的功能,显然,我国民法是建立在单独财产制的基础上的,如果轻易将个人财产列为应分割的财产,就会破坏单独财产制。 一言以蔽之,只有在对财富形成的贡献实际上被抹杀,可以被评估为严重违背社会公认的公平原则的情况下,才应当考虑分割非婚姻财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Property Division of Lottery Contributions in Divorce: Equitable Division of Non-matrimonial Property in Divorce
The U.S. has a fair division of marital property (community property), while the U.K. has a basically equal division. In particular, the United Kingdom does not recognize the division of non-matrimonial property, but in exceptional cases, non-matrimonial property may be considered as marital property and divided, but the division is based on equity, not equal division. Thus, sharing and needs principles are considered together. Our jurisprudence generally does not consider non-matrimonial property to be subject to division, but recognizes it in special circumstances. In other words, our jurisprudence holds that special property is subject to division even if it belongs to one of the spouses, if the other party has actively cooperated in its maintenance, prevented its deterioration or contributed to its increase. While this may be a good choice for the specific justification of protecting the other spouse, it goes beyond the function of property division, and clearly our civil law is based on a separate property system, and the easy inclusion of personal property as property subject to division would undermine the separate property system. Put it in a nutshell, only in cases where the contribution to the formation of wealth is effectively wiped out, which can be assessed as significantly contrary to socially accepted equity, should non-matrimonial property be considered for division.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信