培养积极性

Antonio Starnino
{"title":"培养积极性","authors":"Antonio Starnino","doi":"10.47061/jasc.v3i2.6146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will explore evolving thoughts on how the social field can be an effective lens to address relational tensions within activist groups. Gobby (2020) defines relational tensions as the ideological and social tensions that emerge in an activist group due to power inequalities, which are significant internal barriers for these groups to achieve their goals. I will draw on social movement literature and Scharmer’s (2018) concept of social fields to show how the source conditions of the various individuals that make up these groups affect the quality of how they relate to each other, which give birth to practices and results that either align with their values or create conflictual tensions that can hold these groups back. Through a personal case study, I intend to show how, by shifting an activist group's social field towards one that places relationality at the forefront, these groups can improve how they work together and ultimately avoid breaking apart.","PeriodicalId":243406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurturing Activism\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Starnino\",\"doi\":\"10.47061/jasc.v3i2.6146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will explore evolving thoughts on how the social field can be an effective lens to address relational tensions within activist groups. Gobby (2020) defines relational tensions as the ideological and social tensions that emerge in an activist group due to power inequalities, which are significant internal barriers for these groups to achieve their goals. I will draw on social movement literature and Scharmer’s (2018) concept of social fields to show how the source conditions of the various individuals that make up these groups affect the quality of how they relate to each other, which give birth to practices and results that either align with their values or create conflictual tensions that can hold these groups back. Through a personal case study, I intend to show how, by shifting an activist group's social field towards one that places relationality at the forefront, these groups can improve how they work together and ultimately avoid breaking apart.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v3i2.6146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v3i2.6146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将探讨关于社会领域如何成为解决激进团体内部关系紧张问题的有效视角的发展思路。高比(2020)将关系紧张定义为激进团体中因权力不平等而产生的意识形态和社会紧张关系,这是这些团体实现其目标的重要内部障碍。我将借鉴社会运动文献和沙默(Scharmer,2018 年)的社会领域概念,说明组成这些团体的不同个体的来源条件如何影响他们相互关系的质量,从而催生出与他们的价值观相一致或产生冲突性紧张关系的做法和结果,从而阻碍这些团体的发展。通过一项个人案例研究,我打算说明如何通过将激进团体的社会领域转向将关系性放在首位的社会领域,来改善这些团体的合作方式,并最终避免分崩离析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurturing Activism
This article will explore evolving thoughts on how the social field can be an effective lens to address relational tensions within activist groups. Gobby (2020) defines relational tensions as the ideological and social tensions that emerge in an activist group due to power inequalities, which are significant internal barriers for these groups to achieve their goals. I will draw on social movement literature and Scharmer’s (2018) concept of social fields to show how the source conditions of the various individuals that make up these groups affect the quality of how they relate to each other, which give birth to practices and results that either align with their values or create conflictual tensions that can hold these groups back. Through a personal case study, I intend to show how, by shifting an activist group's social field towards one that places relationality at the forefront, these groups can improve how they work together and ultimately avoid breaking apart.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信