跟随领导者创新还是领导跟随者创新?台湾银行业分析

Jen-Ying Shih, Tsai-Hsiu Lin
{"title":"跟随领导者创新还是领导跟随者创新?台湾银行业分析","authors":"Jen-Ying Shih, Tsai-Hsiu Lin","doi":"10.3390/engproc2023055033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In response to the rapid development of the global economy and FinTech innovation, Taiwan’s government has continuously promoted digital transformation policies for the financial industry and encouraged the industry to strengthen infrastructure constructions and upgrade innovative financial services and patents. Novel ideas are proposed to create a new situation and make banks invincible but it is questionable if such innovations necessarily bring competitiveness or business performance. To answer this question, we analyzed market competition using the PR test and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to study the operational efficiency of banks. K-means were also used to segment banks into three groups, Leader, Chaser, and Laggard. The data included financial (business performance) and patent data (innovation) of Taiwan’s banks from 2013 to 2020. The research results revealed that the market competition in the Leader group was the most intense. Quasi-public banks were relatively inefficient in creating revenue, while private banks were more efficient. The Chaser group showed the most apparent changes in operational efficiency from 2013 to 2020. The banks in the Laggard group needed to strengthen the relative efficiency of revenue, and financial innovation needed to be individualized in this competitive market group.","PeriodicalId":504392,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Following the Leader’s Innovation or Leading Follower’s Innovation: Taiwan’s Banking Industry Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jen-Ying Shih, Tsai-Hsiu Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/engproc2023055033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In response to the rapid development of the global economy and FinTech innovation, Taiwan’s government has continuously promoted digital transformation policies for the financial industry and encouraged the industry to strengthen infrastructure constructions and upgrade innovative financial services and patents. Novel ideas are proposed to create a new situation and make banks invincible but it is questionable if such innovations necessarily bring competitiveness or business performance. To answer this question, we analyzed market competition using the PR test and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to study the operational efficiency of banks. K-means were also used to segment banks into three groups, Leader, Chaser, and Laggard. The data included financial (business performance) and patent data (innovation) of Taiwan’s banks from 2013 to 2020. The research results revealed that the market competition in the Leader group was the most intense. Quasi-public banks were relatively inefficient in creating revenue, while private banks were more efficient. The Chaser group showed the most apparent changes in operational efficiency from 2013 to 2020. The banks in the Laggard group needed to strengthen the relative efficiency of revenue, and financial innovation needed to be individualized in this competitive market group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:随着全球经济和金融科技创新的快速发展,台湾政府不断推动金融业数字化转型政策,鼓励金融业加强基础设施建设,提升创新金融服务和专利。新颖的想法被提出来,以开创一个新局面,使银行立于不败之地,但这些创新是否一定能带来竞争力或经营业绩,却令人怀疑。为了回答这个问题,我们使用 PR 测试和数据包络分析法(DEA)分析了市场竞争情况,研究了银行的运营效率。我们还使用 K 均值法将银行分为三组:领先者、追赶者和落后者。数据包括 2013 年至 2020 年台湾银行的财务数据(经营业绩)和专利数据(创新)。研究结果显示,领先者组的市场竞争最为激烈。准公共银行的创收能力相对较弱,而私营银行的创收能力较强。从 2013 年到 2020 年,追赶者组的运营效率变化最为明显。落后银行组的银行需要加强收入的相对效率,金融创新在这一市场竞争组中需要个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Following the Leader’s Innovation or Leading Follower’s Innovation: Taiwan’s Banking Industry Analysis
: In response to the rapid development of the global economy and FinTech innovation, Taiwan’s government has continuously promoted digital transformation policies for the financial industry and encouraged the industry to strengthen infrastructure constructions and upgrade innovative financial services and patents. Novel ideas are proposed to create a new situation and make banks invincible but it is questionable if such innovations necessarily bring competitiveness or business performance. To answer this question, we analyzed market competition using the PR test and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to study the operational efficiency of banks. K-means were also used to segment banks into three groups, Leader, Chaser, and Laggard. The data included financial (business performance) and patent data (innovation) of Taiwan’s banks from 2013 to 2020. The research results revealed that the market competition in the Leader group was the most intense. Quasi-public banks were relatively inefficient in creating revenue, while private banks were more efficient. The Chaser group showed the most apparent changes in operational efficiency from 2013 to 2020. The banks in the Laggard group needed to strengthen the relative efficiency of revenue, and financial innovation needed to be individualized in this competitive market group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信