选择开发已勘探油气田的经济理由

I. Pistunov, Yelyzaveta Horobets
{"title":"选择开发已勘探油气田的经济理由","authors":"I. Pistunov, Yelyzaveta Horobets","doi":"10.37634/efp.2023.11.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a study that combines two methods: clustering of fields using machine learning algorithms and building a regression model for forecasting the cost and economic efficiency of an oil and gas field. In the course of this study, a neural network of direct propagation was developed, which is used to forecast the cost of developing wells in oil and gas fields, taking into account all technical parameters. The resulting neural network, formed on the basis of algorithms of input data, forms output signals when any set of input signals of the training set is applied to the input of the network. The resulting neural network expresses patterns that are present in the input data. This network turns out to be the functional equivalent of some model of dependencies between variables. Indicators of 15 wells were used to create the ANN model. The main task of the model is to determine the cluster of a new deposit. Conventional designations (x - for exogenous (explored factors and y - for actual calculated cost data). Input data (x) for neural network training were: The smallest thickness of oil-bearing formations; The largest thickness of oil-bearing formations; Gas factor; Reservoir temperature; Porosity; Permeability ; Oil and gas content in the formation; Occurrence depth; Water flow rate; Oil flow rate; Gas flow rate; Volume of extracted oil; Volume of extracted gas; Design depth of the well. After dividing the educational sample into classes, a model of the dependence of the following factors on the input was created for each cluster: Approximate cost of well construction without VAT (thousands of dollars); Estimated cost of well construction including VAT (thousands of dollars); Profit (thousands of dollars); Cost of well construction (thousands of dollars); The cost of 1 m of penetration without VAT (dollars); The cost of 1 m of penetration including VAT (dollars). Data, on the training sample for which these indicators were known, the accuracy of the forecast was checked. The error did not exceed 5%. Then, calculations were made for explored wells, but those where the economic indicators are unknown. Based on the calculated well development cost values, the efficiency factor was calculated as a fraction of the predicted development cost divided by the explored reserves. And it is recommended for development that explored field, which has the lowest indicator.","PeriodicalId":112155,"journal":{"name":"Economics. Finances. Law","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic justification of the choice of development of an explored oil and gas field\",\"authors\":\"I. Pistunov, Yelyzaveta Horobets\",\"doi\":\"10.37634/efp.2023.11.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents a study that combines two methods: clustering of fields using machine learning algorithms and building a regression model for forecasting the cost and economic efficiency of an oil and gas field. In the course of this study, a neural network of direct propagation was developed, which is used to forecast the cost of developing wells in oil and gas fields, taking into account all technical parameters. The resulting neural network, formed on the basis of algorithms of input data, forms output signals when any set of input signals of the training set is applied to the input of the network. The resulting neural network expresses patterns that are present in the input data. This network turns out to be the functional equivalent of some model of dependencies between variables. Indicators of 15 wells were used to create the ANN model. The main task of the model is to determine the cluster of a new deposit. Conventional designations (x - for exogenous (explored factors and y - for actual calculated cost data). Input data (x) for neural network training were: The smallest thickness of oil-bearing formations; The largest thickness of oil-bearing formations; Gas factor; Reservoir temperature; Porosity; Permeability ; Oil and gas content in the formation; Occurrence depth; Water flow rate; Oil flow rate; Gas flow rate; Volume of extracted oil; Volume of extracted gas; Design depth of the well. After dividing the educational sample into classes, a model of the dependence of the following factors on the input was created for each cluster: Approximate cost of well construction without VAT (thousands of dollars); Estimated cost of well construction including VAT (thousands of dollars); Profit (thousands of dollars); Cost of well construction (thousands of dollars); The cost of 1 m of penetration without VAT (dollars); The cost of 1 m of penetration including VAT (dollars). Data, on the training sample for which these indicators were known, the accuracy of the forecast was checked. The error did not exceed 5%. Then, calculations were made for explored wells, but those where the economic indicators are unknown. Based on the calculated well development cost values, the efficiency factor was calculated as a fraction of the predicted development cost divided by the explored reserves. And it is recommended for development that explored field, which has the lowest indicator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics. Finances. Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics. Finances. Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2023.11.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics. Finances. Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2023.11.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项结合两种方法的研究:使用机器学习算法对油气田进行聚类,以及建立预测油气田成本和经济效益的回归模型。在这项研究过程中,开发了一个直接传播神经网络,用于预测油气田开发油井的成本,同时考虑到所有技术参数。在输入数据算法的基础上形成的神经网络,在将任意一组训练集输入信号应用于网络输入时,都会形成输出信号。由此形成的神经网络可以表达输入数据中存在的模式。该网络在功能上等同于变量之间的某种依赖关系模型。ANN 模型使用了 15 口井的指标。该模型的主要任务是确定新矿床的群集。传统名称(x - 表示外生(已探明因素,y - 表示实际计算成本数据)。用于神经网络训练的输入数据 (x) 包括含油地层的最小厚度;含油地层的最大厚度;气体系数;储层温度;孔隙度;渗透率;地层中的油气含量;出现深度;水流量;油流量;气流量;采油量;采气量;油井设计深度。在将教育样本划分为不同等级后,为每个群组创建了以下因素对输入的依赖模型:不含增值税的建井成本估算(千美元);含增值税的建井成本估算(千美元);利润(千美元);建井成本(千美元);不含增值税的 1 米渗透成本(美元);含增值税的 1 米渗透成本(美元)。在已知这些指标的训练样本上,对预测的准确性进行了检查。误差不超过 5%。然后,对经济指标未知的已探井进行计算。根据计算出的油井开发成本值,计算出效率系数,即预测开发成本除以已探明储量的分数。建议开发指标最低的已探明油田。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic justification of the choice of development of an explored oil and gas field
The paper presents a study that combines two methods: clustering of fields using machine learning algorithms and building a regression model for forecasting the cost and economic efficiency of an oil and gas field. In the course of this study, a neural network of direct propagation was developed, which is used to forecast the cost of developing wells in oil and gas fields, taking into account all technical parameters. The resulting neural network, formed on the basis of algorithms of input data, forms output signals when any set of input signals of the training set is applied to the input of the network. The resulting neural network expresses patterns that are present in the input data. This network turns out to be the functional equivalent of some model of dependencies between variables. Indicators of 15 wells were used to create the ANN model. The main task of the model is to determine the cluster of a new deposit. Conventional designations (x - for exogenous (explored factors and y - for actual calculated cost data). Input data (x) for neural network training were: The smallest thickness of oil-bearing formations; The largest thickness of oil-bearing formations; Gas factor; Reservoir temperature; Porosity; Permeability ; Oil and gas content in the formation; Occurrence depth; Water flow rate; Oil flow rate; Gas flow rate; Volume of extracted oil; Volume of extracted gas; Design depth of the well. After dividing the educational sample into classes, a model of the dependence of the following factors on the input was created for each cluster: Approximate cost of well construction without VAT (thousands of dollars); Estimated cost of well construction including VAT (thousands of dollars); Profit (thousands of dollars); Cost of well construction (thousands of dollars); The cost of 1 m of penetration without VAT (dollars); The cost of 1 m of penetration including VAT (dollars). Data, on the training sample for which these indicators were known, the accuracy of the forecast was checked. The error did not exceed 5%. Then, calculations were made for explored wells, but those where the economic indicators are unknown. Based on the calculated well development cost values, the efficiency factor was calculated as a fraction of the predicted development cost divided by the explored reserves. And it is recommended for development that explored field, which has the lowest indicator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信