安东-京特对泛神论的批判作为其启示哲学的导言

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Balázs M. Mezei
{"title":"安东-京特对泛神论的批判作为其启示哲学的导言","authors":"Balázs M. Mezei","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2023.2283915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ingenious thought of Anton Günther (1783 – 1863) is rarely mentioned in the annals of nineteenth-century philosophy. However, in the eyes of his contemporaries, Günther belonged to the key thinkers of his age on par with Kant, Fichte, Hegel, and Schelling. Günther was an original writer yet he left many of his insights undeveloped or ambiguously formulated. As a fl amboyant and popular debater, he attacked the most in fl uential philosophers of his time. His attacks were aimed especially at what he termed the unavoidable pantheism of these thinkers, a pantheism Günther often identi fi ed with monism. Monism, semi-monism, pantheism, and semi-pantheism are recurring charges of Günther against many in fl uential thinkers, including even Descartes, whose thought Günther considered otherwise epoch-making. Based on a reformed Cartesianism, Günther elaborated his antidote he termed dualism. Yet Güntherian dualism turns out to be a synthesis properly termed organicism. On such a basis, Günther carried out a heroic attempt to transcend the horizon of traditional views and open the vista of an I-centered philosophy built on the universal notion of revelation. By re-reading this Bohemia-born thinker, one can have a better understanding of the scope and in fl uence of what we term Austrian Philosophy.","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anton Günther’s critique of pantheism as introduction to his philosophy of revelation\",\"authors\":\"Balázs M. Mezei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17496977.2023.2283915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ingenious thought of Anton Günther (1783 – 1863) is rarely mentioned in the annals of nineteenth-century philosophy. However, in the eyes of his contemporaries, Günther belonged to the key thinkers of his age on par with Kant, Fichte, Hegel, and Schelling. Günther was an original writer yet he left many of his insights undeveloped or ambiguously formulated. As a fl amboyant and popular debater, he attacked the most in fl uential philosophers of his time. His attacks were aimed especially at what he termed the unavoidable pantheism of these thinkers, a pantheism Günther often identi fi ed with monism. Monism, semi-monism, pantheism, and semi-pantheism are recurring charges of Günther against many in fl uential thinkers, including even Descartes, whose thought Günther considered otherwise epoch-making. Based on a reformed Cartesianism, Günther elaborated his antidote he termed dualism. Yet Güntherian dualism turns out to be a synthesis properly termed organicism. On such a basis, Günther carried out a heroic attempt to transcend the horizon of traditional views and open the vista of an I-centered philosophy built on the universal notion of revelation. By re-reading this Bohemia-born thinker, one can have a better understanding of the scope and in fl uence of what we term Austrian Philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2023.2283915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2023.2283915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安东-冈特(1783-1863 年)的独创性思想在十九世纪哲学史上鲜有提及。然而,在同时代人的眼中,冈特是与康德、费希特、黑格尔和谢林齐名的重要思想家。冈特是一位具有独创性的作家,但他的许多见解尚未得到发展或表述含糊不清。他是一个有胆识、受欢迎的辩论家,他攻击了当时最有影响力的哲学家。他的攻击尤其针对他所称的这些思想家不可避免的泛神论,冈特经常将这种泛神论与一元论相提并论。一元论、半一元论、泛神论和半泛神论是冈特对许多重要思想家反复提出的指控,甚至包括笛卡尔。在经过改革的笛卡尔主义的基础上,冈特阐述了他的解毒剂,他称之为二元论。然而,冈特的二元论被证明是一种被称为有机论的综合。在此基础上,冈特进行了一次英勇的尝试,他超越了传统观点的视野,打开了建立在普遍启示概念之上的以我为中心的哲学的视野。通过重读这位出生于波希米亚的思想家,我们可以更好地理解我们所说的奥地利哲学的范围和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anton Günther’s critique of pantheism as introduction to his philosophy of revelation
The ingenious thought of Anton Günther (1783 – 1863) is rarely mentioned in the annals of nineteenth-century philosophy. However, in the eyes of his contemporaries, Günther belonged to the key thinkers of his age on par with Kant, Fichte, Hegel, and Schelling. Günther was an original writer yet he left many of his insights undeveloped or ambiguously formulated. As a fl amboyant and popular debater, he attacked the most in fl uential philosophers of his time. His attacks were aimed especially at what he termed the unavoidable pantheism of these thinkers, a pantheism Günther often identi fi ed with monism. Monism, semi-monism, pantheism, and semi-pantheism are recurring charges of Günther against many in fl uential thinkers, including even Descartes, whose thought Günther considered otherwise epoch-making. Based on a reformed Cartesianism, Günther elaborated his antidote he termed dualism. Yet Güntherian dualism turns out to be a synthesis properly termed organicism. On such a basis, Günther carried out a heroic attempt to transcend the horizon of traditional views and open the vista of an I-centered philosophy built on the universal notion of revelation. By re-reading this Bohemia-born thinker, one can have a better understanding of the scope and in fl uence of what we term Austrian Philosophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual History Review
Intellectual History Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信