非殖民化圣经?后殖民学院中的图像、想象力和想象力

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Prof. J. Punt
{"title":"非殖民化圣经?后殖民学院中的图像、想象力和想象力","authors":"Prof. J. Punt","doi":"10.38140/at.vi.6931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complicity of the Bible in the colonial endeavour is no longer seriously disputed. However, efforts to decolonise the Bible, biblical studies and their roles in colonising theology, that start with accounting for interpreters’ social locations, remain few and limited in scope. Ensconced in the image of ideologically secure and contented intellectual space, epistemological and hermeneutical approaches which explicitly involve the social location of interpreters and academic discourses are still viewed with concern if not suspicion. Antipathy towards cultural studies approaches such as postcolonial theory on the one hand is born from ideological preoccupation, intellectual comfort and turf-protection, but on the other hand deprives the biblical studies guild (and associated studies in theology and religion) from a broader spectrum of resources and reimagined engagements with biblical texts and their colonialist-infused legacies.","PeriodicalId":39489,"journal":{"name":"Acta Theologica","volume":"126 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonising Bibles? Image, imagination, and imagin(in)g in the postcolonial academy\",\"authors\":\"Prof. J. Punt\",\"doi\":\"10.38140/at.vi.6931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complicity of the Bible in the colonial endeavour is no longer seriously disputed. However, efforts to decolonise the Bible, biblical studies and their roles in colonising theology, that start with accounting for interpreters’ social locations, remain few and limited in scope. Ensconced in the image of ideologically secure and contented intellectual space, epistemological and hermeneutical approaches which explicitly involve the social location of interpreters and academic discourses are still viewed with concern if not suspicion. Antipathy towards cultural studies approaches such as postcolonial theory on the one hand is born from ideological preoccupation, intellectual comfort and turf-protection, but on the other hand deprives the biblical studies guild (and associated studies in theology and religion) from a broader spectrum of resources and reimagined engagements with biblical texts and their colonialist-infused legacies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Theologica\",\"volume\":\"126 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Theologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38140/at.vi.6931\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Theologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38140/at.vi.6931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圣经在殖民活动中的共谋作用已不再受到严重质疑。然而,从解释者的社会位置入手,对《圣经》、圣经研究及其在殖民神学中的作用进行非殖民化的努力仍然很少,而且范围有限。在意识形态安全和满足的知识空间中,那些明确涉及解释者和学术话语的社会位置的认识论和诠释学方法,即使不是受到怀疑,也仍然受到关注。对后殖民主义理论等文化研究方法的反感,一方面源于意识形态上的先入为主、知识上的安逸和地盘上的保护,另一方面却剥夺了圣经研究协会(以及神学和宗教方面的相关研究)更广泛的资源,以及对圣经文本及其被殖民主义灌输的遗产的重新认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decolonising Bibles? Image, imagination, and imagin(in)g in the postcolonial academy
The complicity of the Bible in the colonial endeavour is no longer seriously disputed. However, efforts to decolonise the Bible, biblical studies and their roles in colonising theology, that start with accounting for interpreters’ social locations, remain few and limited in scope. Ensconced in the image of ideologically secure and contented intellectual space, epistemological and hermeneutical approaches which explicitly involve the social location of interpreters and academic discourses are still viewed with concern if not suspicion. Antipathy towards cultural studies approaches such as postcolonial theory on the one hand is born from ideological preoccupation, intellectual comfort and turf-protection, but on the other hand deprives the biblical studies guild (and associated studies in theology and religion) from a broader spectrum of resources and reimagined engagements with biblical texts and their colonialist-infused legacies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Theologica
Acta Theologica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Theologica is the official and accredited theological journal of the Faculty of Theology of the University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信