超越方法:定性和多种方法研究中三角测量的理论基础"

R. Vivek, Y. Nanthagopan, Sarmatha Piriyatharshan
{"title":"超越方法:定性和多种方法研究中三角测量的理论基础\"","authors":"R. Vivek, Y. Nanthagopan, Sarmatha Piriyatharshan","doi":"10.2478/seeur-2023-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the “triangulation approach” in social science research methods. Triangulation is an emerging method specifically in qualitative and multi-method studies. Researchers in the social sciences have increased their use of the triangulation approach recently due to the merits of this approach, especially to conduct in-depth studies through multiple inquiries. Simultaneously, this method has criticism and misconceptions among social researchers in terms of what it is, how it can be used, and the credibility of the findings when used. Therefore, this paper analyses in depth what triangulation is, the types of triangulations and how they can be applied in the social sciences. The study basically adopted systematic literature review and used 30 articles published in scientific journals. The paper critically reviewed journal articles related to triangulation, revealed how different types of triangulation methods have been applied in the social sciences and highlighted the merits and cautions of applying this method. The paper theoretically contributes to understanding the phenomenon of the triangulation approach and how it connects with qualitative and multi-method studies. In addition, it revealed that the following data collection techniques from multiple sources can be exploited: in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, literature, documents, and surveys on the triangulation method to improve the credibility and reliability of the research. Furthermore, the study empirically contributes to social science researchers applying this approach with proper understanding.","PeriodicalId":332987,"journal":{"name":"SEEU Review","volume":"23 7","pages":"105 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Methods: Theoretical Underpinnings of Triangulation in Qualitative and Multi-Method Studies”\",\"authors\":\"R. Vivek, Y. Nanthagopan, Sarmatha Piriyatharshan\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/seeur-2023-0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores the “triangulation approach” in social science research methods. Triangulation is an emerging method specifically in qualitative and multi-method studies. Researchers in the social sciences have increased their use of the triangulation approach recently due to the merits of this approach, especially to conduct in-depth studies through multiple inquiries. Simultaneously, this method has criticism and misconceptions among social researchers in terms of what it is, how it can be used, and the credibility of the findings when used. Therefore, this paper analyses in depth what triangulation is, the types of triangulations and how they can be applied in the social sciences. The study basically adopted systematic literature review and used 30 articles published in scientific journals. The paper critically reviewed journal articles related to triangulation, revealed how different types of triangulation methods have been applied in the social sciences and highlighted the merits and cautions of applying this method. The paper theoretically contributes to understanding the phenomenon of the triangulation approach and how it connects with qualitative and multi-method studies. In addition, it revealed that the following data collection techniques from multiple sources can be exploited: in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, literature, documents, and surveys on the triangulation method to improve the credibility and reliability of the research. Furthermore, the study empirically contributes to social science researchers applying this approach with proper understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEEU Review\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"105 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEEU Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2023-0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEEU Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2023-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本文探讨了社会科学研究方法中的 "三角测量法"。三角测量法是一种新兴的方法,尤其适用于定性研究和多方法研究。由于三角测量法的优点,特别是可以通过多重调查进行深入研究,社会科学研究人员近来越来越多地使用这种方法。与此同时,这种方法在社会研究人员中也存在一些批评和误解,如它是什么、如何使用以及使用后研究结果的可信度等。因此,本文将深入分析什么是三角测量法、三角测量法的类型以及如何在社会科学中应用三角测量法。本研究基本上采用了系统的文献综述,使用了 30 篇发表在科学期刊上的文章。论文对与三角测量相关的期刊论文进行了严格审查,揭示了不同类型的三角测量方法在社会科学中的应用,并强调了应用这种方法的优点和注意事项。论文在理论上有助于理解三角测量法的现象,以及它如何与定性研究和多方法研究相联系。此外,它还揭示了可以利用以下多种来源的数据收集技术:深度访谈、焦点小组讨论、文献、文件和关于三角测量法的调查,以提高研究的可信度和可靠性。此外,本研究还为社会科学研究人员正确理解这一方法做出了经验性贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Methods: Theoretical Underpinnings of Triangulation in Qualitative and Multi-Method Studies”
Abstract This paper explores the “triangulation approach” in social science research methods. Triangulation is an emerging method specifically in qualitative and multi-method studies. Researchers in the social sciences have increased their use of the triangulation approach recently due to the merits of this approach, especially to conduct in-depth studies through multiple inquiries. Simultaneously, this method has criticism and misconceptions among social researchers in terms of what it is, how it can be used, and the credibility of the findings when used. Therefore, this paper analyses in depth what triangulation is, the types of triangulations and how they can be applied in the social sciences. The study basically adopted systematic literature review and used 30 articles published in scientific journals. The paper critically reviewed journal articles related to triangulation, revealed how different types of triangulation methods have been applied in the social sciences and highlighted the merits and cautions of applying this method. The paper theoretically contributes to understanding the phenomenon of the triangulation approach and how it connects with qualitative and multi-method studies. In addition, it revealed that the following data collection techniques from multiple sources can be exploited: in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, literature, documents, and surveys on the triangulation method to improve the credibility and reliability of the research. Furthermore, the study empirically contributes to social science researchers applying this approach with proper understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信