2008-2017 年狂犬病控制计划的成本效益分析:系统回顾

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
I. Tunas, D. A. Laksemi, Luh Putu, R. Sundari, I. Putu, Eka Widyadharma
{"title":"2008-2017 年狂犬病控制计划的成本效益分析:系统回顾","authors":"I. Tunas, D. A. Laksemi, Luh Putu, R. Sundari, I. Putu, Eka Widyadharma","doi":"10.1177/09720634231216829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rabies is still a public health problem. It is a zoonotic disease caused by a viral infection of the central nervous system. Several efforts have been taken, and one of them is mass vaccination for dogs. This systematic review aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of controlling rabies disease. Three online databases used as the source of this review are PubMed, ProQuest and CINAHL (EBSCO), published between 2008 and 2017. Fourteen articles reviewed based on the eligibility criteria were related to the intervention in preventing and controlling rabies. The articles consist of three randomised controlled trials and six nonrandomised controlled trials, including a pre-test-post-test-controlled design. Moreover, there is a one-time series article, which is an intervention for only one group of samples. Eight articles are directed at the intervention of lifestyles involving increased physical activity, diet and nutrition, with the main purpose to prevent the increase of metabolic syndrome status. Cost-effectiveness estimation is based on the mass vaccination programme for dogs, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) administration for humans and the combination of both. The model and variables in cost-effectiveness analysis are widely varied and associated with demography, socio-economics and programmes conducted in the study area.","PeriodicalId":45421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rabies Control Program, 2008–2017: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"I. Tunas, D. A. Laksemi, Luh Putu, R. Sundari, I. Putu, Eka Widyadharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09720634231216829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rabies is still a public health problem. It is a zoonotic disease caused by a viral infection of the central nervous system. Several efforts have been taken, and one of them is mass vaccination for dogs. This systematic review aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of controlling rabies disease. Three online databases used as the source of this review are PubMed, ProQuest and CINAHL (EBSCO), published between 2008 and 2017. Fourteen articles reviewed based on the eligibility criteria were related to the intervention in preventing and controlling rabies. The articles consist of three randomised controlled trials and six nonrandomised controlled trials, including a pre-test-post-test-controlled design. Moreover, there is a one-time series article, which is an intervention for only one group of samples. Eight articles are directed at the intervention of lifestyles involving increased physical activity, diet and nutrition, with the main purpose to prevent the increase of metabolic syndrome status. Cost-effectiveness estimation is based on the mass vaccination programme for dogs, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) administration for humans and the combination of both. The model and variables in cost-effectiveness analysis are widely varied and associated with demography, socio-economics and programmes conducted in the study area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634231216829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634231216829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

狂犬病仍然是一个公共卫生问题。这是一种由中枢神经系统病毒感染引起的人畜共患疾病。目前已采取了多项措施,其中之一就是为狗接种大规模疫苗。本系统综述旨在评估控制狂犬病的成本效益。本综述使用的三个在线数据库是 PubMed、ProQuest 和 CINAHL (EBSCO),发表于 2008 年至 2017 年之间。根据资格标准审查的 14 篇文章与预防和控制狂犬病的干预措施有关。这些文章包括三项随机对照试验和六项非随机对照试验,其中包括前测-后测-对照设计。此外,还有一篇一次性系列文章,只对一组样本进行干预。有 8 篇文章针对增加体育锻炼、饮食和营养的生活方式进行干预,主要目的是防止代谢综合征病情加重。成本效益估算以狗的大规模疫苗接种计划、人类的暴露后预防(PEP)管理以及两者的结合为基础。成本效益分析的模型和变量多种多样,与研究地区的人口、社会经济和计划有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rabies Control Program, 2008–2017: A Systematic Review
Rabies is still a public health problem. It is a zoonotic disease caused by a viral infection of the central nervous system. Several efforts have been taken, and one of them is mass vaccination for dogs. This systematic review aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of controlling rabies disease. Three online databases used as the source of this review are PubMed, ProQuest and CINAHL (EBSCO), published between 2008 and 2017. Fourteen articles reviewed based on the eligibility criteria were related to the intervention in preventing and controlling rabies. The articles consist of three randomised controlled trials and six nonrandomised controlled trials, including a pre-test-post-test-controlled design. Moreover, there is a one-time series article, which is an intervention for only one group of samples. Eight articles are directed at the intervention of lifestyles involving increased physical activity, diet and nutrition, with the main purpose to prevent the increase of metabolic syndrome status. Cost-effectiveness estimation is based on the mass vaccination programme for dogs, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) administration for humans and the combination of both. The model and variables in cost-effectiveness analysis are widely varied and associated with demography, socio-economics and programmes conducted in the study area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Management
Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信